Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Jamie George looks dejected following England's loss to South Africa (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

November finally ended in a smile for England last Sunday, Japan getting put to the sword following an exasperating run of Saturday matches where New Zealand, Australia and South Africa all skipped away from Allianz Stadium beaming with the victories secured by their greater prowess down the finishing straight.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steve Borthwick and co were left with plenty to chew. The kicking calamity against the All Blacks, the damned leaky blitz defence versus the Wallabies and then a general lack of oomph when it most mattered when taking on the Springboks. Routing the Japanese couldn’t – and didn’t – make up for any of this misfortune.

We’re now 28 games deep into the Borthwick era and his record is a breakeven 14 wins and 14 losses. That will needle.

Video Spacer

World Rugby Dream Team

Video Spacer

World Rugby Dream Team

Having awarded 17 players enhanced elite player squad contracts for the season that are worth a small fortune, this Autumn Nations Series was optimistically approached and the in-camp expectation was for a minimum three-wins-from-four return. It didn’t materialise.

Forty players – 22 forwards and 18 backs – were in camp over the four match weeks, 19 appearing as starters, 12 as replacements and nine more not making a single match day 23.

There were six ever-present forward starters and four ever-present backs and three of these 10 players who started all four matches – Maro Itoje, Ben Earl and Tommy Freeman – played every one of the 320 minutes available. Next up is the February 1 Six Nations trip to Ireland. In the meantime, here are the RugbyPass Autumn Nations Series England player ratings:

FULL-BACK (2)
George Furbank – 4.5/10
3 starts, 197 mins (1 try): Bang average series where he failed to kick on from last spring’s Six Nations promise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Freddie Steward – 3/10
1 start, 80 mins: Given his chance versus the Springboks, he was left grasping at air by fleet-footed opponents.

WING (6)
Tommy Freeman – 5
4 starts, 320 mins: Fared better on the right wing in the latter two matches compared to left wing isolation, but still not very satisfying apart from an outrageous assist for Furbank. Outside centre role in 2025, anyone?

Ollie Sleightholme – 7.5
2 starts + 1 run as sub, 205 mins (4 tries): Injury opened the selection door and he galloped through. Some tackling errors in the system but exceptional attack. Has to be a Six Nations starter.

Immanuel Feyi-Waboso – 6
2 starts, 120 mins (1 try): A shame that concussion against the Wallabies prematurely ended his series. Experienced the memory of a lifetime with his stadium-exploding try versus the All Blacks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tom Roebuck – 5.5
2 runs as sub, 29 mins (1 try): A pair of short-lived cameos but was decent.

Elliot Daly – No rating
0 mins: Trained the first three match weeks, then stepped out due to an unspecified injury.

Cadan Murley – No rating
0 mins: Replaced Daly for the Japan match week but didn’t make the 23.    

MIDFIELD (4)
Ollie Lawrence – 6.5
4 starts, 313 mins: Rated as satisfying to good across the series, but the infuriating part was not give him more ball more against New Zealand.

Henry Slade – 3
4 starts, 291 mins: Wasn’t battle hardened enough for Test rugby having had just a single club appearance. His blitz was woundingly all over the shop.

Alex Lozowski – No rating
0 mins: Was seeking a first cap since 2018 but it didn’t materialise despite training all four match weeks.

Luke Northmore – No rating
0 mins: Trained all four match weeks but still uncapped.

OUT-HALF (3)
Marcus Smith – 7.5
4 starts, 303 mins (9 penalties, 13 conversions): Ended series with Borthwick realising he has to trust him, not whip him off as criminally happened against New Zealand. Excellent in attack but will rue defence which cost crucial tries against Australia (bit in instead of drifting) and South Africa (charged down kick).

George Ford – 2
2 runs as sub, 35 mins + 1 unused sub: Quite the fall in grace for one of England’s best in Six Nations 2024. Paid heavy price for lack of club action. Both appearances were error-strewn, leaving him subjected to some fan booing and an unused sub ordeal versus South Africa.

Fin Smith – 5.5
1 run as sub, 25 mins: Decent against Japan apart from one penalty clearance not finding touch, but his cameo mustn’t be over-rated given the low standard of opposition. Needed to play in one of the bigger Tests but Borthwick sadly didn’t fancy him.

SCRUM-HALF (3)
Ben Spencer – 5.5
2 starts, 125 mins: One of the month’s heart-warming stories as he made a first Test start at the age of 32 and didn’t disappoint facing the All Blacks. Unfairly punished for the in-game momentum loss versus the Aussies.   

Jack van Poortvliet – 4.5
2 starts, 109 mins: In from out of the blue for a first cap in 15 months, but the nuisance Springboks had his number and he wasn’t an upgrade on Spencer. A missed opportunity with England without the injured Alex Mitchell.

Harry Randall – 4.5
4 runs as sub, 86 mins: Not considered a starter, his role was to add energy from the bench but the way England finished their big opening three games didn’t reflect well on what he did.     

LOOSEHEAD (3)
Ellis Genge – 5
4 starts, 232 mins: His scrummaging was on mostly on the money but aspects of his wider game, such as his usually reliable tackling, left him down.  

Fin Baxter – 4.5
4 runs as sub, 88 mins: Similar to Randall, his brief as a sub in all four games was to add impetus from the bench, but New Zealand was the only fixture where he delivered.    

Joe Marler – No Rating
0 mins: Left camp on the Monday night of the All Blacks match week. Then ignited a social media row with his haka comments and finished the week by confirming his Test rugby retirement.

HOOKER (3)
Jamie George – 4.5
4 starts, 210 mins (2 tries): His engine wasn’t what it was and his repeat early exits sparked questions about the validity of his captaincy. Did better in the latter two appearances. Lineout accuracy was generally on point.     

Theo Dan – 3
1 run as sub, 27 mins: Chosen last month as an enhanced EPS player, he made just a single appearance against the All Blacks and then disappeared from consideration.  

Luke Cowan-Dickie – 4.5
3 runs as sub, 92 mins (2 tries): Impressed against Japan but lacked accuracy and precision to make a real difference against the Wallabies and the Springboks.  

TIGHTHEAD (4)
Will Stuart – 6.5
4 starts, 236 mins: Huge step forward in his credibility, especially with his consistent scrummaging. England’s set-piece lost momentum in the big games after he went off.

Dan Cole – 4
3 runs as sub, 59 mins: A series where time seemed to catch up with the much-celebrated 37-year-old. The South African appearance could well be his final Test career appearance.  

Asher Opoku-Fordjour – 6
1 run as sub, 25 mins: What a story, the 20-year-old making a Test debut just 18 weeks after helping England to win the World Rugby U20 Championship in Cape Town. It was only a cameo versus Japan but it was satisfying to see youth given exposure.    

Trevor Davison – No rating
0 mins: One of four players who trained every match week (Alex Coles, Lozowski and Northmore were the other three) without seeing action.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by England Rugby (@englandrugby)

SECOND ROW (5)
Maro Itoje – 7
4 starts, 320 mins (1 try): Played every minute with good reason as his grittiness was important in making England competitive at breakdown and set-piece. The bigger the player, though, the more high profile the mistakes. His horrors were the knock-on of the restart after he gave his team the lead against Australia with a converted try and the following Saturday’s try-cancelling neck roll on Malcolm Marx.

George Martin – 5.5
4 starts, 283 mins: This was his most inconsistent run in the Test shirt. Normally a glue player who does the basics exceptionally well, there were uncharacteristic missed tackles and a level of inaccuracy not usually associated with him.

Nick Isiekwe – 4
4 runs as sub, 50 mins: The third player who played off the bench in all four games along with Randall and Baxter, the impression was that Borthwick isn’t a massive fan. Three minutes against New Zealand and four versus the Springboks was way too short a time to contribute.   

Alex Coles – No rating
0 mins: Trained the whole way through but only deemed good enough to help out on match day with the pre-game warm-up.

Charlie Ewels – No rating
0 mins: Trained matches weeks two and three but got not further.

FLANKER (6)
Chandler Cunningham-South – 7
3 starts +1 run as sub, 291 mins (2 tries): The 21-year-old is now very much an integral part of the English back row with his level of physicality. Showed he can play a bit of ball too with his scores against Australia.

Tom Curry – 5.5
3 starts, 163 mins: Heartening to see him safely get through 80 minutes against the Japanese after tackle tech left him knocked out 15 days earlier. He was missed in the defence when he wasn’t on the field.

Alex Dombrandt – 4
3 runs as sub, 84 mins: Provided further evidence that he is struggling to take his game up a few notches and show that he definitely belongs at Test level.   

Ben Curry – 4
1 run as sub, 20 mins: Was the additional forward on the six/two bench against New Zealand, he didn’t do enough in that appearance to demand further selection.

Sam Underhill – 7.5
2 starts, 82 mins (2 tries): We didn’t see a whole lot of him as he got injured against Japan, but he was exceptional versus the Springboks, reminding everyone of his class ability when fully fit and firing.

Ted Hill – No rating
0 mins: Trained three match weeks (missed Australia) but was another overlooked for the games.  

No8 (1)
Ben Earl – 6.5
4 starts, 320 mins (1 try): England’s main ball carrier with 54 carries over the series, there was a satisfyingly good consistency to his game. Similar to Itoje, though, his few errors were high profile, namely the penalised no-arms tackle that revved up New Zealand and then the missed tackle on South Africa’s Damian de Allende for a Cheslin Kolbe try.

  • Ratings index: 10/10 – Perfect, 9. Exceptional, 8. Very good, 7. Good, 6. Satisfying, 5. Average, 4. Insufficient, 3. Bad, 2. Very bad, 1. Terrible, 0. Unacceptable.

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

16 Comments
O
Oh no, not him again? 1 day ago

While most the English media and BBC armchair warriors screamed for Borthwick's head. I was critical of the Player's lack of accuracy and poor basic skills. So I can't and wouldn't argue with these below average ratings. If you sack Borthwick the you are still left with Player's who are along way away from their best.

P
PL 12 days ago

Can't wait fot the next 6 Nations, England is definitely back and it promises some epic battles. Coming from a froggy fan

M
Mark 13 days ago

I think the ratings were mostly fair tbh, the simple fact is that Borthwick is being far to loyal to some players who are clearly well past their sell by date, this coupled with the fact that England currently don't have any truly world class operators and we are where we are.

I also think that poor decisions were made in selection in regard to Henry Slade and George martin, neither of whom appeared fully fit after lengthy lay offs pre series.

The decision to pick Tom curry given his concussion issues also showed a lack of judgement.

Borthwick and his coaching team are very callow in international coaching terms, and it's shows!!

B
Bull Shark 13 days ago

Ratings. Generous.

M
Mike 13 days ago

I know the article is about player ratings, but as I read it, especially the number of players who were in camp but didn't get into a match day XXIII, never mind the run on XV, I interpret it as "coaching ratings", and I am sorry but Steve Borthwick and his team do not score very highly in that regard. Picking George Ford against NZ after a month off due to a quad injury was downright incoherent, and whilst the RP rating reflects how he performed, the blame must go on the coaching staff not the player.


At the risk of being accused of being an arrogant Englishman, I think the England head coach job, should it become vacant, would attract a number of proven international coaches. Another option could be to put someone in above SB as "Director of Rugby" or similar, to mentor an inexperienced coaching group that should not have been allowed to assemble in the first place, in my view.


Short version: England must finish in the top 3 in the 6N, or else change should be mandatory.

f
fl 13 days ago

you're absolutely right that England need to finish in the top 3, but I really think they will. I think the top 3 could be an absolute dog fight, and I don't expect there to be a big gulf between England and whoever wins.

B
Bob Salad II 13 days ago

Can’t really complain about those scores. Individually, too many were off their best and went missing in big, match defining moments. Collectively, the team often looked muddled and lacked cool-headed, leadership especially in the final quarter of games. This was further compounded by a quality drop-off from the bench.


Calls for Borthwick’s dismissal have grown increasingly louder with each passing game as he has been shown to be tactically and selectively subpar. His position is now in the balance and I don’t believe he’ll be kept on unless England fix their defensive issues and beat at least one of Ireland, France or Scotland in the 6Ns, which on the latest showing looks increasingly unlikely.


Couple of returning players in Chessum and Mitchell coupled with a stronger bench, might give England fans a few reasons to remain optimistic.

L
LE 13 days ago

Team i would like to see

Furbank, Feyi-Weboso, Freeman, Lawrence, Sleightholme, F.Smith, Mitchell, Baxter, George, Stuart, Itoje, Martin, CCS, Underhill, Earl

Dan, Genge, AOF, Isikwe, T.Curry, Spencer, M.Smith, Lozowski

f
fl 13 days ago

decent lineup. I'm not conviced by Lozowski though. Slade is in better premiership form, and there's no reason to think Lozowski would be an improvement on Slade's internaitonal form.

T
Tom 13 days ago

Team i would like to see

Stuart Lancaster, Shaun Edwards, Mike Catt, Graham Rowntree

L
LE 13 days ago

A refreshingly accurate player rating article, would have had Baxter a bit higher but otherwise seems about right given the amount of game time and impact each player had.

Sad thing is come the six nations we will still see Slade and Ford eating up minutes regardless of club form as Borthwick has proved he has a devil you know attitude and is unwilling to take risks

T
Tom 13 days ago

The only game Underhill really played was against the best team in the world where you've said he was exceptional and rated him 7.5?


Smith deserved higher. His defensive errors you've highlighted were part of a failing defensive system and trying to clear up JVPs charged down kick. Both very forgivable. Yet in attack he created most of our tries single handedly and both his kicking from hand and tee were great.


Will Stuart was also better than 6.5.


A lot of these ratings are pretty harsh, I think individually most players were pretty solid. It's the cohesion in attack and defence which was lacking. I'd rate the players higher and give a 1 to Wiggles and JEA.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 32 minutes ago
'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress'

Razor is compensating, and not just for the Foster era.


Thanks again for doing the ground work on some revealing data Nick.


This article misses some key points points that are essential to this debate though;


Razor is under far more pressure than Rassie to win

Rassie is a bolder selector than Razor, and far more likely to embrace risk under pressure than his counterpart from New Zealand.

It doesn't realise the difficulties of a country like South Africa, with no rugby season to speak of at the moment, to get full use out of overseas internationals

Neither world player of the year Pieter-Steph du Toit nor all-world second row Eben Etzebeth were automatic selections despite the undue influence they exert on games in which they play.

The last is that one coach is 7 years into his era, where the other is in his first, and is starting with a far worse blank slate than where upon South Africa's canvas could be layered onto after 2017.

The spread at the bottom end is nothing short of spectacular. Seventeen more South Africans than New Zealanders started between one and five games in 2024.

That said, I think the balance needs to be at least somewhere in the middle. I don't know how much that is going to be down to Razor's courage, and New Zealands appetite however.


Sadly I think it is going to continue and the problem is going to be masked by much better results next year, even forgotten with an undefeated season. Because even this article appears to misconstruing the..

known quantities

as being TJP and Sam Cane. In the context of what would need to change for the numbers above to be similar, it's players like Jordie Barrett, Beauden Barrett, Rieko Ioane, Sevu Reece, Ethan Blackadder, Codie Taylor, where the reality needs to be meet face on.


On Jordie Barrett at Lienster, I really hope he can be taught how to tackle with a hard shoulder like Henshaw and Ringrose have. You can see in these highlights he doesn't have the physical presence of those two, or even the ones behind him in NZ like ALB and AJ Lam. I can't really seem him making leaps in other facets if he's already making headlines now.

6 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
The All Blacks don't need overseas-based players

I'm not sure you realise how extreme it is, previously over half of SR players ended up overseas. These days just over half finish their career at home (some of those might carry on in lower leagues around the world).


1. Look at a player like Mo'unga who took time to become comfortable at his max level, thrust a player like that in well above his level, something Farrell is possibly doing now with Pendergrast, and you fail to maximise your player base as a whole. I don't think you realise the balance in NZ, without controlling who can leave there is indeed right now an immediate risk from any further pressure on the balance. We are not as flush as a country like South Africa I can't imagine (look at senior mens numbers).


2. Your idea excludes foreign fans, not the current status, their global 1.8mil base (find a recent article about it) will dwindle. Our clubs don't compete against each other, it's a central model were all players have a flat max 200k contribution. NZR decides who is worth keeping for the ABs in a very delicate balance of who to let go and who not. Might explain why our Wellington game wasn't a sellout.


3. Players aren't going to play for their country for nothing while other players are getting a million dollars. How much does SARU pay or reimburse their players?


4. I don't believe that at all. Everything so far has pointed to becoming an AB as the 'profile' winner. Comms love telling their fans some 'lucky' 1 cap guy is an "All Black" and the audience goes woooh!

The reality is much more likely to be more underwhelming

But the repercussions are end game, so why is it worth the risk?

Hardly be poaching uni or school boys.

This comment is so out of touch with rugby in NZ.

European comps aren't exactly known for poaching unproven talent ie SR or up not down to NPC.

So, so out of touch. Never heard of Jamison Gibson-Park, or Bundee Aki, or Chandler Cunningham-South, what about Uino Atonio? Numerous kiwi kids, like Warner Dearns, are playing in Japan having left after some stardom in school rugby here. Over a third of the NRL (so basically a third of the URC) are Kiwis who likely been scouted playing rugby at school. France have recently started in that path with Patrick Tuifua, and you hear loosely about good kids taking up offers to go overseas for basic things like school/uni (avg age 20+), similar to what attracts island kids to NZ.


But that's getting off track, it's too far in the future for you to conceptualize in this discussion. Where here because you think you know what it's like to need to select overseas based players, because of similarities like NZ and SA both having systems that funnel players into as few teams as possible in order to make them close to international quality, while also having a semi pro domestic league that produces an abundance of that talent, all the while facing similar financial predicaments. I'm not using extremes like some do, to scare monger away from making any changes. I am highlighting where the advantages don't cross over to the NZ game like the do for South Africa.


So while you are right in a lot of respects, some things that the can be taken for granted, is that if not more players leave, higher calibre players definitely will, and that is going to weaken the domestic competitions global reach, which will make it much hard to keep up or overtake the rest of the world. To put it simply, the domestic game is the future. International rugby is maxed out already, and the game here somehow needs to double it's revenue.


This is what you need to align your pitch with. Not being able to select players from overseas, because there are only ever one or two of those players. Sometimes even no one who'd be playing overseas and good enough for the ABs. You might be envisioning the effects of extremes, because it's hard to know just how things change slightly, but you know it's not going to be good.

94 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will overseas selection make the difference for British and Irish Lions? Will overseas selection make the difference for British and Irish Lions?
Search