Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ex-Ireland players left disappointed after 'unsatisfactory' Autumn Nations series

Ireland celebrate as Gus McCarthy scores the match winning try during the Autumn Nations Series 2024 match between Ireland and Australia at the Aviva Stadium on November 30, 2024 in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Ireland’s 22-19 win over the Wallabies to end the November Autumn campaign has left an “unfulfilling” taste as expectactions for Andy Farrell’s side went unmet.

ADVERTISEMENT

They came into the Autumn Nations Series with the world number one ranking but will finish the year in second. After dropping the first test to New Zealand, Ireland beat Argentina, Fiji and Australia, but the manner of the wins over the two Rugby Championship teams were “unsatisfactory”.

Ex-Ireland international Shane Horgan said that the team had “concerns” after giving Australia too many chances to win the game. The Wallabies raced out to a 10-0 lead in the first 20 minutes.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“They look quite relieved to get the victory and positive element of this, but ultimately is an unsatisfactory performance,” Horgan told Virgin Media Sport. 

“It’s been an unsatisfactory autumn series. And you know, there’s definitely some concerns there.

“Australia looked tired, and in the end, they didn’t look capable of doing the 50 odd meters that they needed a few times to to win the game.

“Ireland gave them enough chances and they didn’t take it but the second half was certainly a marked improvement on the first.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former fullback Rob Kearney credited the bench with lifting the home side to victory after Australia held a 13-5 lead at half-time.

Ireland hit the front eight minutes from time with a rolling maul try to reserve hooker Gus McCarthy.

“The bench made a big difference, Casey came on, he brought a bit of zip and some good tempo to it,” Kearney said. 

“I thought Peter Mahoney did very well when he came on too. They brought a bit of energy and that’s what the team needed because we spoke about that first half, very poor, litter ridden, too many errors. They tightened things up a fair bit in the second half.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They had a huge amount of possession but never really looked like creating too many opportunities or too many try scoring opportunities.

“So the second half performance was definitely better, but not enough to not cause a little bit of concern about where exactly are this team at the moment.”

Irish TV pundit Matt Williams said that the quality of the Ireland 23 meant they had no excuses for coming so close to defeat.

We were saying that across the November series, yes, the southern hemisphere teams looked far better in the first week or so because the northern hemisphere teams haven’t played for so long, which is, which is a very valid argument,” Williams said. 

“But as November has gone along, we’ve seen the northern hemisphere teams click in, get a little bit more cohesion and move forward, all except Ireland, or you can say against Fiji.

If we pick the combined Ireland-Australian side, there’s very few Australians that make the 23 you know, there’d be all arguments about them.

“You could pick an Irish side. So Ireland should beat that side on talent by a considerable margin.”

 

 

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
J
JW 10 days ago

Much better performance from the Irish, credit to them, did well to push Australia all the way.


I hope it's a springboard for better things to come, seemed like they were trying to return to more of their link play and was a bit more timing and speed to it than over the last year. Also did well to play to Australia, where you have to hold onto the ball a step or two further.


Very unlucky for Aus not to have squeaked over or at least drew at the end, I'd be worried that Schmidt hasn't had the team find the same flair and panache as they did against England, repeatedly turned down chances to run and counter at the end. Really though they have to be stoked that the pressure now goes on to the B&I Lions to pick the right players and find cohesion, because generally it's much hard for that team to perform as the sum of their parts.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 41 minutes ago
'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players'

There are a couple of inadequacies in this articles points as well.


First

Robertson, in what he has said publicly, is building his argument for change as a means to close the gap that is increasing between the All Blacks and South Africa.

Based on recent performances, the All Blacks are better than the Springboks.


Second

Both games saw the All Blacks lead coming into the last 30 minutes, only for the momentum to shift dramatically once the two sides emptied their respective benches.

The failings of the second half were game plan related, they happened regardless of whether the bench had yet (play got worse very early in the half, even in the first half) been used or not.


And third

Robertson’s view is that because the Boks don’t lose access to their experienced players when they head offshore, it gives them an advantage

Didn't Razor have the most experienced team all year?


Also

“Sam Cane and Ardie Savea with Wallace Siti, what a balance that is.

This is part of Razor's problem. That's a terrible balance. You instead want something like Sam Cane, Hoskins Sotutu, Wallace Sititi. Or Ardie Savea, Sititi, Scott Barrett. Dalton Papaili'i, Savea, Finau. That is balance, not two old struggling to keep up players and an absolute rookie.

It has changed. Not many go north, more go to Japan, so how do we get the balance right to ensure that players who have given loyalty, longevity and who are still playing well

Experience is a priceless commodity in international rugby and New Zealand has a system where it throws away players precisely when they are at their most valuable.

You mean how do we take advantage of this new environment, because nothing has effectively changed has it. It's simply Japan now instead of Europe. What's it going to be like in the future, how is the new American league going to change things?


Mo'unga is the only real valid reason for debating change, but what's far more important is the wide discussion happening that's taking the whole game into account. The current modem throws players away because they decided to go with a 5 team model rather than a 12 or 14 team model. Players have to be asked to leave at the point were we know they aren't going to be All Blacks, when they are playing their best rugby, reached their peak. In order to reset, and see if the next guy coming through can improve on the 'peak' of the last guy. Of course it's going to take years before they even reach the departing players standards, let alone see if they can pass them.


What if there can be a change that enables New Zealand to have a model were players like Jamison Gibson-Park, James Lowe, Bundee Aki, Chandler Cunningham-South, Ethan Roots, Warner Dearns are All Blacks that make their experienced and youth developemnt the envy of the World. That is the discussion that really needs to be had, not how easy it is to allow Mo'unga to play again. That's how the All Blacks end up winning 3 World Cups in a row.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Easterby takes the reins as cracks appear in Ireland's masterplan Easterby takes the reins as cracks appear in Ireland's masterplan
Search