Tactical trends already clear in the curtailed rugby season
Although the rugby season looks to be on hold indefinitely around the world, it’s been a fascinating one so far with plenty to look back at. A seismic world cup, a raft of new international coaches, a drama-filled European domestic season, and some interesting events in Super Rugby make for plenty of tactical trends to analyse while we wait for rugby to return.
RugbyPass takes a look at a few standout trends from the season so far and considers whether we might see more of them.
Forwards, forwards, forwards
One of the clearest tactical trends this year stemmed from South Africa’s world cup success and their then forwards coach, Matt Proudfoot, who is now with England.
6/2 bench splits? Check. In-field mauls? Check. Dominant scrum? Check.
Continue reading below…
South Africa set the standard of a back-to-basics approach, showing that it doesn’t matter how talented your backs are, they will always struggle without a platform from the forwards. England followed suit in the Six Nations, after their humbling defeat in the RWC final, with increasing success.
They weren’t the only ones on the international scene, however. Scotland have also been developing a game plan that relies more on grunt work from their forwards than the high-risk approach they had been known for under Gregor Townsend so far (although they haven’t gone full South Africa yet and seem unlikely to, given their personnel.
It’s not subtle and it’s not pretty but it is effective if you have the manpower to do it. Versatility is required in the backs — not everyone has Frans Steyn or Henry Slade to cover most of the backline in a pinch.
How much this trend influences or impacts countries where more aesthetically pleasing football skills have long been the preferred approach will be interesting in the future. South Africa vs New Zealand has once more become a humdinger of a game, might England vs Australia follow suit? England vs Wales in the Six Nations was certainly one for the neutral.
Playmaker 15s
The use of forwards and a 6/2 bench split isn’t the only tactical trend we can see demonstrated in the England national team. The idea of a playmaker 15 was a little controversial during the Rugby World Cup, partly because of the two most high-profile examples (which we’ll come to), but it can be seen around the rugby world.
Continue reading below…
Of course, playmaker full-backs are not exactly new but they have tended to be the outstanding option in their position in recent years, such as Stuart Hogg for Scotland. What has been interesting this season is the way teams have opted for a playmaker at 15 despite a) excellent alternatives and b) either noticeable cons to the selection or other reasons for the choice.
Both England and New Zealand, for example, dropped established, traditional fullbacks. Beauden Barrett, of course, started his test career mostly at 15 and New Zealand had been experimenting with Damien Mackenzie in the same role before his injury to give them more flexibility in attack.
But it also seemed that moving Barrett, who had been the best fly half in the world since the last RWC, to the 15 jersey and dropping the outstanding Ben Smith was about getting a more reliable kicker into the side after close games against the Lions and South Africa.
England had already moved away from Mike Brown and his reliable work in defence and under the high ball in favour of Elliot Daly, an outside centre by trade. Questions were repeatedly asked of Daly’s ability under the high ball, on and off the field, but Eddie Jones valued his vision and kicking in attack more than the potential risk in defence.
Continue reading below…
Elsewhere, Australia often prioritised carrying in the centres to add to their lighter pack but asked Kurtley Beale to bring his playmaking to the full back role. Even South Africa, the forward-heavy arch-pragmatists, used Willie leRoux as a playmaker at times.
The compromise that this selection sometimes demands is particularly interesting because it touches on the broader role of attack and defence in a team’s approach and tactical shifts there.
Attack vs defence
Three of the four RWC semi-finalists had games based on defence and they all suffocated their more attacking quarter-final opponents (England, South Africa, Wales). In this Six Nations, although England continued to use their defence, Wales and France, as well as Ireland and Scotland, seemed to swap approaches.
The work of France’s new defence coach, Shaun Edwards, was evident in both their phase and scramble defence as well as in their more structured approach to games whereas Wales abandoned the defensive platform that served them so well under Warren Gatland and went all out in attack, albeit with rather less immediate success. Elsewhere, Ireland switched to placing a little more emphasis on attack and Scotland certainly worked on their defence.
How this might play out elsewhere is interesting. New Zealand have long had a reliable defence but it was their attack that has stood out. Will they shift their approach going forward to combat South Africa or will they double down on attack as a means of winning games?
Continue reading below…
Australia were determined to run the ball wherever possible rather than kick, to their eventual detriment, in Japan. Will Dave Rennie alter their mentality or will he see going down in flames of glory as more important to fans?
Tactical decisions around attack and defence are not just based on the players available. Wales had excellent attacking options under Gatland but chose to focus on defence, just as Scotland are currently, for example. It’s about risk vs reward and the higher the level of play, the finer the margins are.
At domestic level, for instance, Toulouse have reverted to their thrilling attacking approach. Northampton Saints and Bristol Bears have also been entertaining Gallagher Premiership fans with their attack-minded games. How much teams like those would have prospered in the knockout stages against more defence-minded teams would have been fascinating to see — and hopefully something we will still get an answer to.
Double opensides
With the breakdown increasingly significant in attack and defence, the proliferation of jackalers in teams is no surprise. Australia’s “Pooper” duo, which took them all the way to the 2015 final, and Wales’ stellar use of Sam Warburton and Justin Tipuric in 2013 to surprise England and claim the Six Nations title, were both high profile twin openside pairings but this policy went to a whole new level in Japan 2019.
Australia again opted for Michael Hooper and David Pocock but, with less ball-carrying in the tight five, Pocock had to play No6 rather than at No8, where he had featured in 2015, reducing his effectiveness as he found himself having to perform a lot of the dirty work of a blindside at the breakdown (previously handled by Scott Fardy) rather than capitalising on it.
England, who had long resorted to a twin blindside approach in the absence of traditional options for the No 7 jersey, suddenly found themselves with two impressive young options at the same time and, with both fit, went for it. Their success was based on asking Tom Curry to develop the attributes of a blindside in the lineout to maintain the balance across the back row that Australia lacked.
Continue reading below…
Since then, England have moved Curry to the No8 jersey, maintaining balance by asking Courtney Lawes to play on the blindside but keeping a twin jackal threat. This approach was prompted by the absence of Billy Vunipola and, interestingly, reflects the solution Wales took when they lost their own world-class No 8 before the RWC, Taulupe Faletau: asking their versatile back rower, Josh Navidi, to play at the back of the scrum.
New Zealand, already in possession of some of the best lineout operators in world rugby, played Sam Cane and Ardie Savea as twin opensides in Japan, asking Kieran Read to use his vast experience to adjust his game and thereby enable the system to work.
This was partly necessitated by the absence of a traditional blindside but it was interesting that their worst performance was against England, when they instead opted for a third lock in the No6 position, rather than a second openside. It may be some time before we see it, in the current circumstances but, with Read retired, it seems likely that Savea would have played at No8 for New Zealand this season, alongside Cane on the openside.
Of course, versatility across the back row is fairly common at domestic level (teams like Cardiff Blues and Sale frequently play with three opensides, for instance) but the finer margins at international level means the benefits of two opensides must be balanced against the cost elsewhere to the pack.
Watch: Andy Goode and Jim Hamilton on THAT Joe Marler incident
Comments on RugbyPass
Not good to hear Ulster described as “financially troubled”. Did not think it was getting to that level. I would hope the Irish system of spreading players of talent away from Leinster would kick in now. Better to have a Leinster fringe player with Ulster or Connacht, then getting only a few games a season in Dublin. 10, for example, would seem to be a case for spreading the talent. I would not be at all adverse to a SA man coming in as head coach/DR. Ludeke is worth trying. Certainly got a long and impressive coaching career at this level…..149 games in SR, then Japan, 30 years experience. And Ulster’s ledger of successful SA coaches and players is on the positive side. Is talk of Ruan Pienaar interested in coming back as a coach…..could be a good combination with Ludeke. And Pienaar and family would have no settling in to do, one would judge. He loved life in Ulster when there, by all reports.
1 Go to commentsSome thoughts to consider here, Sam. Thanks
2 Go to commentsI think he is right, SBW is respected in RSA. The guy who never stood up is a worm. Sseems lots of NZ SBW hate, you do the crime do the time.
11 Go to commentsAfter missing the curfew, the player was simply too “Shagged” to stand up.
11 Go to commentsVernier is probably the best 12 in the world though she has some English competition these days . I am nervous for England because it is unpredictable France and who knows which team will turn up, but they have not yet shown anything that should worry England, Saturday could be a different day. I would be more confident against the BFs.
1 Go to commentsWhat a difference Rodda and Carter made. Rodda has been out for ages but he is really the only world class lock in Australian rugby. Him, Carter and Beale made a huge difference on the weekend. If only they had a few decent props they’d be a much more dangerous team. Hamish Stewart was excellent last week as well. His carrying has improved significantly and has to be next in line after Paisami at 12 for the Wallabies. He’ll benefit hugely with Beale at fullback, there’s just no better communicator in Australian rugby than him and his experience will make a huge difference for the Force. No one sees space like Beale and he’s still sharp. I can see Force making a late charge into the top 8 if they can get some consistency.
2 Go to commentsRodda will be a walk up starter at lock. Frost if you analyse his dominance has little impact and he’s a long way from being physical enough, especially when you compare to Rodda and the work he does. He was quite poor at the World Cup in his lack of physicality. Between Rodda and Skelton we would have locks who can dominate the breakdown and in contact. Frost is maybe next but Schmidt might go for a more physical lock who does their core work better like Ryan or LSL. Swain is no chance unless there’s a load of injuries. Pollard hasn’t got the scrum ability yet to be considered. Nasser dominated him when they went toe to toe and really showed him up. Picking Skelton effects who can play 6 and 8. Ideally Valetini would play 6 as that’s his best position and Wilson at 8 but that’s not ideal for lineout success. Cale isn’t physical enough yet in contact and defence but is the best backrow lineout jumper followed by Wright, Hanigan and Swinton so unfortunately Valetini probably will start at 8 with Wright or Hanigan at 6. Wilson on the bench, he’s got too much quality not to be in the squad. Paisami is leading the way at 12 but Hamish Stewart is playing extremely well also and his ball carrying has improved significantly. Beale is also another option based on the weekend. Beale is class but he’s also the best communicator of any Australian backline player and that can’t be underestimated, he’ll be in the mix.
8 Go to commentsWhy do people keep on picking Ardie at 7 when he's a ball in hand 8? A modern 7 is the lead tackler and ruck clearer which isn't his strength.
14 Go to commentsSly dig there at Ireland’s propensity to back a non-Irish coach. Must really want it. I’m not sure I like ROG very much. Comes off as unpleasant. But he’d gain my respect if he took a number 7 ranked team and turned them into WC winners. Not even back-to-back. Argentina? Scotland? Or how about Wales? France would be too easy, no?
1 Go to commentsA bit of sensationalism, but surprised by the comments about SBW. I’ve always thought of him as a pretty authentic person. There is nothing worse than working with a colleague you’ve seen straight through.
11 Go to comments100% agree with your comment about Touch. I’ve been playing it competitively since Covid. It’s on a Wednesday night after work. It means the weekend is free for time with my family.
2 Go to commentsRodda back is massively important for the Wallabies. Kaitu at hooker important too coz he was very good a few years ago.
2 Go to commentsThe pink cabous might be eligible this year and the Boks don’t need him
8 Go to commentsNasser and kaitu are options for hooker. Especially Nasser. You forgot Rodda who touch wood will be fit at test time and if fit he’s number one. Great partner for the great Skelton and Oz best lineout caller. Third best lock is LSL whom I’d be inclined to sub on for Skelton around 60 minutes. Probably start valetini at 8 because I like a big body back there. Cale should play 6 at the brumbies. For Wallabies definitely cale in the squad but as an apprentice. Dunno who starts at 6 seru wright Swinton hanigan with Will Harris and Harry Wilson not far away. Seru and Swinton my front runners but Swinton is going. Still if we don’t cap seru then Fiji must coz they need his lineout skills and easily compensate for his lack of weight
8 Go to commentsYeah but who was it?
11 Go to commentsThink you might have written this just before the Brumbies got thrashed last weekend
8 Go to commentsI really do believe that Billy Proctor should be selected at least in the larger squad but also it would be my choice at 13, much more a center than Ioane who can still play at wing. Roigard if fit should play, otherwise it should be Perenara or Christie. Also, Iose could deserve a spot at blindside. Of course, being a Canes supporter I’m biased but I really believe that at least Billy P is deserving a chance and being Holland one of the Selectors, I’m having a little hope he could grab it.
14 Go to commentsI would not play Swinton I’d pick Wright or Hanigan. The rest are decent starters, but can’t agree on any subs except Tupou. My take on the subs: Gibbon, Ueslese, Tupou, LSL, Wilson, White, Will Harrison, and Petaia.
8 Go to commentsSBW the biggest moron to pull on a black jersey a park footy player at best
11 Go to commentsSBW is fast becoming a laughing stock, his misplaced comments & lack of insight Is actually pretty sad.
11 Go to comments