Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Have the Highlanders lost the plot?

By Ben Smith
(Photos by Joe Allison/Getty Images)

New Zealand Rugby faces an upcoming challenge with their first five stocks after the 2023 Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Incumbent starter Richie Mo’unga is heading to Japan on a three-year deal and two-time World Rugby Player of the Year Beauden Barrett is likely to jet off into the sunset after a remarkable All Black career, despite reports of attempts to coax him out of an international retirement.

The All Blacks top two No 10s will be gone next year, presenting a major drop-off in available talent for whoever becomes the next head coach.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Returning Chiefs first five-eighth Damian McKenzie, who played in the Japan league last year, has 40 Tests behind him and remains the best option to become the next long-term All Black No 10.

At 27 years old, McKenzie has plenty to offer Test rugby post-2023.

But if McKenzie ups and leaves too, the All Blacks will be desperate to find a capable first five. The Chiefs playmaker has only committed for one season and is not locked down past 2023.

Which is why the signing of ex-England international Freddie Burns by the Highlanders is all the more baffling. Nothing against Burns, but he cannot pull on the black jersey and never will.

When the All Blacks are in desperate need of developing the next batch of 10s, one of their five franchises should not be off signing non-eligible players. Each season of Super Rugby experience is valuable for a prospect’s development arc that will be wasted on Burns.

ADVERTISEMENT

New Zealand Rugby’s franchises don’t need ‘experience’ from veterans, they need to developing the next crop of potential All Blacks because no one else is going to.

The Highlanders list of first fives include 27-year-old Mitch Hunt, who has 84 Super caps but has not been on the All Black radar as of yet, 33-year-old Marty Banks, who is never going to be, an ex-England international in Burns and 19-year-old Cam Millar.

Unless Hunt is usurped by a younger prospect like Millar there is no reason why he can’t keep the job, but having Banks and Burns on the roster is of absolutely no help to NZR.

There are only three No 10s on New Zealand Super Rugby squads over the age of 30, two of them are on the Highlanders and the other is Beauden Barrett.

ADVERTISEMENT

To give the Highlanders credit, they signed former New Zealand age grade rep Ajay Faleafaga in 2021 as an academy prospect but he is not listed in their 2023 squad, despite promising displays for New Zealand U19 last year.

Former Blues pivot Otere Black is currently playing in division two of the Japan league after 62 Super Rugby caps, so is former Chiefs prospect Kaleb Trask at 23-years-old.

Bringing either option home would be of more benefit to the national selectors.

Of the first fives sitting on other Super Rugby rosters, Harry Plummer at the Blues is sitting in the stands most weeks behind Beauden Barrett and Stephen Perofeta.

The 24-year-old needs game time to get anywhere. Luring him away from the Blues may give him an opportunity to do so.

Related

The Crusaders, Chiefs, Blues and Hurricanes all have made moves to benefit New Zealand Rugby as a whole.

The Crusaders have invested in Fergus Burke’s development since 2018 and this season have taken a chance on bringing 19 year old Taha Kemara down from Waikato to begin his.

The Hurricanes invested in two quality prospects in Aidan Morgan and Ruben Love back in 2020 who are both into their third seasons with the club, whilst bringing back 26 year old and one-time All Black Brett Cameron for another crack.

The Chiefs have brought back Damian McKenzie, kept Bryn Gatland and Josh Ioane, while Northland’s Rivez Reihana is their development prospect. The Blues have Barrett, Perofeta, Plummer and Zarn Sullivan.

If the Highlanders do not fancy Otere Black, Kaleb Trask or Harry Plummer, there are no shortage of options of untapped potential in provincial rugby.

Canterbury’s third choice first five Alex Harford ripped apart Auckland last season in an NPC fixture, showing a prodigious leg and accurate wide passing to set up two Canterbury tries.

That showing alone is enough to warrant interest in the 23-year-old with talent there to be honed and developed further.

Jock McKenzie, a member of the Blues squad last season who made three appearances, is another age grade prospect without a Super team this season.

If you need to go even younger, Byron Smith’s form on the New Zealand under-19 tour to South Africa last year should have all the Super Rugby teams calling to put him in a feeder provincial team.

The question that New Zealand Rugby should be asking is, what the hell are the Highlanders doing? The talent is here, ready for investment and ready for a chance.

The bottom line is any eligible New Zealand player under the age of 25 and over 18 is a better option than Burns, by virtue of having a chance to represent the All Blacks in the future.

And more importantly, the need for New Zealand to do so is as great as ever with the All Blacks about to lose two, possibly three, international quality first fives next year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
Adrian 23 minutes ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

6 Go to comments
T
Trevor 3 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 7 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING England No8 Sarah Beckett banned after leg-breaking croc roll tackle England No8 Sarah Beckett banned after leg-breaking croc roll tackle
Search