Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

It's off - Dan Carter's return to Racing 92 has been stopped

(Photo by Getty Images/Aurelien Meunier)

Dan Carter’s trumpeted return to Top 14 side until the end of the season is off after the player failed a medical, it has been revealed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Carter signed for his former club on a medical joker deal in mid-February as a replacement for Pat Lambie, who had been forced to retire on medical grounds following a series of concussions. According to reports in France, the short-term contract was set to make him between €25,000 and €35,000 a month.

But, following Racing’s seven-try 50-14 Top 14 win over La Rochelle on Saturday, the club issued a short statement confirming that the two-time World Cup champion would not be joining them after all following his recent stint in the Japan league.

“As part of routine medical checks prior to the approval of players’ licences, Racing 92 forwarded certain medical information to experts appointed by the Ligue Nationale de Rugby (LNR). Their opinion was unanimous: Dan Carter will not be able to play rugby in France,” the terse statement said.

Video Spacer

The decision means that Carter will miss out on one final chance to claim a European title. Earlier reports on Saturday had suggested that he was expected to arrive at Racing 92’s Plessis-Robinson training ground around March 10. That arrival date would have meant he was available for the club’s home Champions Cup quarter-final against French rivals Toulouse at the end of the month.

Carter had initially joined Racing after helping New Zealand to the 2015 World Cup, and in 2016 guided the club to their first Top 14 title in 26 years at the first time of asking. That same season, he had missed out on playing in the Champions Cup final against Saracens through injury.

Another injury meant he missed out on Racing’s second Champions Cup final in three years, when he was forced to withdraw from their squad ahead of the final against Leinster in Bilbao in 2018.

ADVERTISEMENT
Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

SVNS - Singapore Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA on back of Springboks snub Hacjivah Dayimani exits SA following Springbok snub
Search