Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Why an unchanged starting line-up will bring the best out of the All Blacks

By Tom Vinicombe
David Havili and Will Jordan. (Photo by Steve McArthur/Photosport)

The All Blacks will run out against Los Pumas this Saturday with an unchanged starting line-up from the side that bested the Springboks in Ellis Park two weekends ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

There’s just one change to the match-day 23 with a neck injury ruling out impact sub Beauden Barrett, paving the way for Stephen Perofeta to join the bench for what will be his debut Test appearance.

“I’m really pleased with the work of the whole squad and there’s a number of guys we know are really pushing hard to get some time but thought that group did a great job and learnt some good lessons and it’s a great opportunity for them to go out again,” said head coach Ian Foster after naming his squad for the upcoming match.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The performance of the 23 that bounced back to beat South Africa 35-23 at Ellis Park effectively saved Foster’s position following five losses from the prior six matches and running out for a second fixture on the trot is just rewards but it will also give the players further opportunities to bed in some flourishing combinations.

In the forward pack, the young trio of Ethan de Groot, Samisoni Taukei’aho and Tyrel Lomax will run out as a front-row unit for just the second time while the more experienced Shannon Frizell, Sam Cane and Ardie Savea also get the opportunity to build on their work in the loose forwards.

In the locks, Sam Whitelock and Scott Barrett are already well aware of the benefits that can come from regular time in the saddle together, having notched up countless appearances alongside one another for both the Crusaders and All Blacks.

“It’s nice to be out there with some people you’ve played with before,” Whitelock said on Thursday. “Obviously, Scott and I have played together a heap of times – not sure on the number. It’s great when you’re starting to get that combination going. It’s something that it’s easy to slip back into, how people play.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Just thinking around Scott and I, I kind of pick up on some of his body language so I know he’s going to do this before the call’s even come in. Which is good and that’s something that definitely does help you play better when you have that combination of people alongside you.”

There’s also a number of Crusaders named in the backline, with Richie Mo’unga, David Havili and Will Jordan all suiting up at their home ground of Orangetheory Stadium.

While the All Blacks underwent a rough start to the season, Jordan believes the team is now coming right after having more time to build on their combinations throughout the opening fixtures of their international campaign.

Related

“I think we’re five or six games into the season now so combinations are starting to grow from where we were in the Irish series,” he said. “It’s nice to be able – with the unchanged team this week – roll through that same stuff again and it certainly helps to be able to keep building on those combinations.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Perhaps one of the less functional partnerships remains the midfield, where Havili and Rieko Ioane are slowly starting to learn one another’s games. While the cohesiveness perhaps wasn’t where it needed to be against the Springboks, Havili believes he and Ioane are moving in the right direction.

“Definitely, I think we can take a lot of confidence from that [game],” he said. “We went to a pretty high stake game, a lot of pressure there, so we can take a lot of confidence into the next couple of games.

“It’s been an absolute pleasure to play with Rieks. You just see what he can do on the field if you give him a wee bit of time and space. He’s a world-class athlete so it’s pretty exciting.”

Saturday’s match is set to kick off at the later time of 7:45pm NZT from Orangetheory Stadium in Christchurch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search