1
Claims Kurt-Lee Arendse's try was illegal on two counts
A significant amount of England fans are complaining that Kurt-Lee Arendse’s remarkable 33rd-minute try at Twickenham was illegal following South Africa’s rout of England.
ADVERTISEMENT
Eddie Jones’ side suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the Springboks as they lost a repeat of the 2019 World Cup final 27-13.
Jones’ men delivered the worst performance of an autumn campaign consisting of a solitary victory over Japan as the 14-man Springboks, inspired by half-backs Faf de Klerk and Damian Willemse, dominated.
By the end of Saturday’s first half, England had spent only six seconds in the opposition 22 and their backline had been reduced to virtual bystanders by a vast error count and the familiar disciplinary issues.
The most brainless moment arrived shortly after the break when Jonny Hill flung De Klerk out of a ruck, prompting referee Angus Gardner to reverse a penalty. Seconds later, Eben Etzebeth was over to extend the lead to 24-6.
Faf De Klerk is every lock's worst nightmare ? #ENGvRSA pic.twitter.com/RPYTgmpR4U
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) November 26, 2022
Unlike their mesmerising comeback to force a draw against New Zealand a week earlier, there were no late heroics this time, even after replacement prop Thomas du Toit had been sent off in the 60th minute for a dangerous challenge on Luke Cowan-Dickie.
Henry Slade dashed over in the 72nd minute but pedestrian England had rarely threatened amid a lack of ideas or tempo in attack.
ADVERTISEMENT
In contrast, the Springboks lit up Twickenham on an otherwise drab evening by running in a sensational try through Kurt-Lee Arendse, prompted by Willemse’s brilliance.
Arendse backed up his four-try salvo against Italy last weekend with the opener at Twickenham in the 33rd minute. Willemse and Willie le Roux combined on the right to set Arendse away and the Springboks wing raced past Marcus Smith before he crossed over in the corner.
2019 flashbacks for England fans ?#ENGvRSA #autumnnationseries pic.twitter.com/njCbD1KyYm
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) November 26, 2022
Many England fans feel the try should have been allowed on two grounds: A block by Arendse on England fullback Freddie Steward and an apparent forward pass to the same player moments later.
“Someone explain to me how the winger hasn’t blocked Steward and taken an intentional step to block the catcher?,” said one fan. “Standard officiating.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Someone explain to me how the winger hasn't blocked Steward and taken an intentional step to block the catcher? Standard officiating #ENGvRSA
— Keysie (@Keysie7) November 26, 2022
“‘Try of the Year’ ?” wrote another… “except for the obvious deliberate block on Steward and the clear forward pass to Arendse. What is the TMO watching?”
‘Try of the Year’ ? ….. except for the obvious deliberate block on Steward and the clear forward pass to Arendse. What is the TMO watching ? #ENGvRSA https://t.co/maKSfLLf9z
— Les B (@MeetTheCritics) November 26, 2022
Erm. Blocking and 2 forward passes? #ENGvRSA
— Joseph Wood (@JosephWood90) November 26, 2022
Blocking and forward pass for that try same old south Africa #ENGvRSA
— Sam Johnson (@1325samjohnson) November 26, 2022
Even seasoned journalists suggested things seemed a little fishy.
“That is such a clever, clinical counter-attack from SA,” wrote Will Kelleher. “Arendse the cute block on Steward, then rinses Smith on the outside to finish it.”
That is such a clever, clinical counter-attack from SA.
Arendse the cute block on Steward, then rinses Smith on the outside to finish it. #ENGvRSA
— Will Kelleher (@willgkelleher) November 26, 2022
“Gently surprised Arendse’s block on Steward not looked at,” wrote Nick Heath. “Fell squarely in the “he knows what he’s doing” category for me, Jim.”
Gently surprised Arendse’s block on Steward not looked at. Fell squarely in the “he knows what he’s doing” category for me, Jim.
— Nick Heath (@nickheathsport) November 26, 2022
In the end it mattered little, with a sizeable gulf between the sides only slightly narrowed thanks to a late try for Henry Slade.
AAP and PA, additional reporting RugbyPass
...you did mean 'a significant number', right? Okay...now that we've sorted that, I'm waiting for the Rassie video and comment. Just saying. I'm sure it will come. Rassie's all about improving reffing.
Boohoo. Get you some cheese with that whine?
There was no inference and no forward pass. Arendse was shoved and he then stepped to his left. As for forward passes, as long as the ball is passed backwards from the hands, it can drift forward. Suck it up.
Sour English folk.
- Arendse didn't block anyone but chased back to ball. The moment Willemse catched the ball stepped out of the way. If the english player slacked down a bit he could've made the tackle. We know it is very easy to step a player if he is at full speed.
- No forward passes. If you pause the video at each moment the passes happen you clearly see the receiver is behind the ball.
Brilliant try and sour English folk.All the Rassie hatters sound a awful lot like him. A week ago there was nothing wrong with the officiating and the British fans made a point of saying there are always 50-50 calls in a game and he should just get over it
He held his line and didn't interfere with the approaching player as per the rules....only a forward pass on the last replay after several times of being shown.
Great try from an All Black Man.
Tit for tat article?
Is it ok to complain and virtue signal about Rassie tweets and then be so "unsupportive of the referees" with an article like this? There were about 15 errors in that game for both sides that slow mo hindsight will show.. or is this just to get click bait maybe?
You can't criticize something you're not committed to, right?
Rassie's on it! No...wait....
Arendse was running toward the ball/catcher, nothing wrong with that, but he did appear to change lanes twice (without looking over his shoulder).
surely the same people who believe Marc Cueto's scored in the 07 RWC final