Why the Chiefs have reason to feel aggrieved with referee Paul Williams
While the Chiefs were undoubtedly their own worst enemies on Saturday night, failing to take advantage of three yellow cards dished out to the Blues throughout their clash at Waikato Stadium, they also have reason to be aggrieved with the officiating in the final quarter of the match.
Blues lock Luke Romano, halfback Sam Nock and replacement prop Marcel Renata were all forced to spend 10 minutes on the sidelines during the game and if the Chiefs had a bit more patience on attack either side of halftime, they may have been able to eke some more offences out of their opposition and referee Paul Williams would have had no choice but to go to the pocket for the persistent indiscretions from the Blues.
The Chiefs chanced their arm on attack, however, and still weren’t able to come out trumps. Come Renata’s yellow card in the 63rd minute, they’d scored zero points, despite their wealth of possession and territory, coupled with their man-advantages.
When Renata was ordered to the sidelines, his position on the field was filled by starter Ofa Tuungafasi, who had been benched only minutes earlier to ensure the Blues had two props on the field for scrums. That change meant loose forward Tom Robinson also had to leave the pitch so that the Chiefs still had their one-man advantage.
Not long after Tuungafasi had returned to the field, however, did the All Blacks prop have to again take a leave of absence after blood began gushing out of his head following some big hits on defence.
With Tuungafasi off the pitch, Robinson was originally shoulder-tapped to return to the field before the Blues were forced to put hooker Kurt Eklund back on the pitch. As stipulated by Law 3.18, ‘only when no replacement front-row player is available is any other player permitted to play in the front row’.
Had Tuungafasi been forced off the field due to a regular knock, as opposed to a blood bin or HIA, the Blues would have been forced to play with 13 men (as was the case during Italy’s Six Nations clash with Ireland earlier this year) but the blood trickling down Tuungafasi’s head saved their blushes in this instance.
Renata’s yellow card combined with Tuungafasi’s blood-binning meant that the Blues had no suitable tightheads available and uncontested scrums were appropriately ruled necessary by referee Williams. Where the referee made an error, however, was at the two subsequent scrums that occurred during Renata’s time in the sinbin.
Under Law 3.15, uncontested scrums must have eight players pack down from either side – even if one team only has seven forwards on the park. This ensures that a team who has received a yellow card is still penalised at scrum-time, even if the team with a full forward pack can’t push them off the ball, because it forces them to effectively play with one less man in the backline.
In the 68th and 69th minutes of the match, the Blues operated with just seven men in their scrum – but the uncontested nature of the contest meant the Chiefs weren’t given any advantage at the set-piece.
Williams should have required one of the Blues back to pack down, which would have given the Chiefs a one-man advantage in the backline.
At this stage of the game, the Chiefs were already down by 20 points and were all but out of the running – but it was still a major error on Williams’ behalf regardless, and the Chiefs may well have found a way to at least notch up some points in the contest. Similarly, Chiefs captain Sam Cane should have raised the issue with the referee.
The Chiefs have no one to blame but themselves for their shortcomings on Saturday night but their inability to convert opportunities into points doesn’t excuse referee Paul Willims from failing to officiate the scrums correctly late in the match.
Comments on RugbyPass
Very unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
2 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
3 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to commentsGreat read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.
2 Go to commentsThe current AB coaching team is basically the Crusaders so it smacks of wanting their familiar leaders around. This is not a good look for the future of the ABs or the younger players in Super working their way up the player ladder. Razor is touted as innovative, forward looking but his early moves look like insecurity and insular, provincial thinking. He is the AB's coach not the Golden Oldies.
10 Go to commentsSimple reason for wanting him back. Robertson wants him as captain. Otherwise he wouldn’t be bothering chasing him. Not enough reason to come back just to mentor.
10 Go to commentsI had not considered this topic like this at all, brilliant read. I had been looking at his record at the Waratahs and thought it odd the Crusaders appointed him, then couple that with all that experience and talent departing and boom. They’ve got some great talent developing though, and in all honesty I don’t think anyone would be over confident taking them on in a playoff match, no matter how poor the first half of their season was. I think they can pull a game out of their ass when it counts.
2 Go to commentsNot a bad list but not Porecki and not Donaldson. Not because they are Tahs, or Ex Tahs, they are just not good enough. Edmed should be ahead. Far more potential. Wilson should be 8 and Valentini 6. Wilson needs to be told by his father and his coach, stop bloody running in to brick wall defence. You’re not playing under the genius Thorn any more. He’s a fantastic angle runner. The young new 8 from the Brumbies looks really good too. The Lonegrans are just too small for international rugby as is Paisami, as is Hamish Stewart at 12. Both great at Super Rugby level. Stewart could have been a great 10 if not for Brad Thorn. Uru should be there and so should Tupou. Tupou just needs good Australian coaching which he hasn’t been getting. I don’t think Schmidt will excite him.
3 Go to commentsIf he wants to come back then he should. He will be a major asset to the younger locks and could easily be played as an impact player off the bench coming on in the last 30. He is fit, strong and capable and has all the experience to make up for any loss in physical prowess. He could also be brought back with a view to coaching within the structures one day. Duane Vermeulen played until he was 37 or 38. He is now a roaming coach within the South African coaching structures. He was valuable in the last world cup and has been a major influence on Jasper Wiese and other young players which has helped and accelerated their development and growth. Whitelock could do the exact same thing for NZ
10 Go to commentsBrett Excellent words… finally someone (other than DC) has noted that Hanigan is very hard and very good at doing what Backrow should do… his performance via the Drua sauna was quite daunting for those on the other side… very high tackle count… carries with good end result… constant threat to make a good 20-25 meters with those long legs… providing his mass effectively to crunching the Drua pack… Finally he is returning to quality form… way to much injury time over the last 2 years… smart-strong-competent in his skills… caught every lineout throw aimed at him and delivered clean pass to whoever was down below… and he worked hard for the whole 80 minutes… Ned has to be in the top 5 for backrow honors… He knows what is required as he has been there before…
20 Go to commentsI think Sam Whitelock should not touch a return with a bargepole. He went out on a high, playing in the RWC Final. He would be coming back into a team that will be weaker than last years, and might even be struggling to win games, especially against the Boks. Stay in France, enjoy another year with Pau, playing alongside his brother.
10 Go to commentsRyan Coxon has been very impressive considering he was signed by WF as injury cover whilst Uru has been a standout for QR, surprised neither of those mentioned
3 Go to commentsIt’s the massive value he brings with regard team culture/values, preparation, etc. Can’t buy that. I’m hoping to see the young locks get their chance in the big games though.
10 Go to commentsAll good, Gregor, except that you neglected to mention Sam Darry amongst that talented pool of locks. In fact, given Hannah’s inexperience and the fact that Holland won’t be eligible until next year, Lord and Darry might be the frontrunners this year, to join Barrett, Tuipoluto, Va’ii and possibly Whitelock. In fact there might be room for all of them if Barrett played 6 (like Ollie Chessum).
10 Go to comments