1
Wales player ratings: Wales against England is always a tough watch for the Welsh supporter. ‘The old enemy’ is the most painful team to lose against and will lead to more scrutiny than any other defeat. Wales went into this game with one win and one loss. A tough visit to Twickenham could make or break Wales’ campaign.
ADVERTISEMENT
The first half was gloomy, but the second was more positive for Wayne Pivac’s men. Sadly for Welsh fans, they fell short at the final hurdle.
15. Liam Williams – 5.5
Picked up a deserved yellow card for handling the ball in a silly position. Took some difficult high balls and was typically unpredictable, for better or worse.
14. Alex Cuthbert – 8
Cuthbert’s early break sadly led to nothing, but was a good confidence booster for the winger. The Osprey had a lot of opportunities to run against his old Exeter team-mate Jack Nowell, and generally did very well.
13. Owen Watkin – 5
Didn’t get many opportunities with ball in hand, but didn’t really make any errors before his substitution.
12. Nick Tompkins – 7.5
Put in a great kick to nearly set up Watkin early on and made a handful of dominant tackles. Scored Wales’ second try and slotted into a new distribution role seamlessly.
11. Josh Adams – 7.5
Safe to say it was a smart idea for Pivac to pick Adams in his actual position. Took his try in characteristic fashion. Hopefully this is a return to form for Adams.
ADVERTISEMENT
10. Dan Biggar – 6
The fly-half got stuck in on defence, including a big shot on his Northampton teammate Courtney Lawes. His kicking was good, but not to the same heights of his 2015 heroics. Biggar led his team well once again.
9. Tomos Williams – 8.5
Williams kicked well, made a break and gave a fun overhead pass to set up a Cuthbert break, which is worth something. His pass to Adams for Wales’ opening score was exquisite.
1. Wyn Jones – 5
Somehow managed to eek a penalty out of Kyle Sinckler during Wales’ sin-bin period, wasting valuable seconds. Didn’t do anything special, but had an alright game before going off early in the second half.
2. Ryan Elias – 3.5
Elias didn’t get much chance to shine this week. Will take a lot of unfair flak for two dodgy throws, but his jumpers certainly didn’t help him. His performance picked up around the 55 minute mark, before getting substituted 12 minutes later.
ADVERTISEMENT
3. Tom Francis – 4
After a strong performance against Scotland, Francis hit a multitude of rucks once again. Was alright around the park, if unflashy.
4. Will Rowlands – 8
Stole multiple promising England lineouts and tackled well. Coupled with some great carries, Rowlands worked hard around the park. One of his best games in a Welsh shirt so far.
5. Adam Beard – 4.5
Wales’ lineout caller Beard made a really poor call to not jump on a promising lineout on the English 5m line, and seemingly repeated this error on his own line for the Dombrandt try. Beard wasn’t bad, but wasn’t quite at his high standards.
6. Ross Moriarty – 5.5
The word to describe Moriarty is usually “hungry”. There’s something telling about him capping off a flashy line break by running directly into Marcus Smith. A decent performance from Moriarty.
7. Taine Basham – 3
Basham is physically tremendous, but still learning the ropes of decision making at Test level. Was substituted at the right time.
8. Taulupe Faletau – 8
Spent the first half refinding his mojo after injury, but came up with plenty of “thank goodness for Taulupe” moments. Always goes forward and doesn’t miss many tackles. A vital cog in Wales’ machine, and a sumptuous athlete.
REPLACEMENTS
16. Dewi Lake – 5
Solid at set-piece and came up with a fantastic jackal turnover at the end. Sadly threw one poor line-out.
17. Gareth Thomas – 5.5
Made a solid impact – carried well and played to Wales’ system.
18. Leon Brown – 5.5
Brown’s cameo during Francis’ HIA went okay – he survived a 5m scrum, which is a daunting prospect from the bench.
19. Seb Davies – 5
Davies is a good impact player – athletic, good carrier and good offloader. Generally stayed on script and played well.
20. Jac Morgan – 6.5
Morgan made a good impact – carried very well and made a half-break at the end.
21. Kieran Hardy – 7.5
Repeated his heroics of last year with a try from a quick tap in the 79th minute. It was bold to put him on, but he provided Wales with some tempo.
22. Gareth Anscombe – 6
A smart substitution – Wales had to play loosely if they were to snatch a win late on, and Anscombe operated nicely as a second distributor.
23. Jonathan Davies – 5.5
Tackled well in typical Jonathan Davies fashion. Didn’t have the same effect as he did against Scotland, but played well overall.
Comments on RugbyPass
Exciting place to be for the young fella. I expected he was French Polynesian when I saw him included in the France 6N squad (after seeing him in NZs), and therefor be strong grounds we might loose him to rugby down here. Good, in that he is good enough to warrant such a profile, and from a journalism’s fan interaction aspect, to finally get a back ground story on the fella. Hope he has settled into NZ OK and that at least one rugby country will fit with him to help his development, which, if so, he should surely continue for a few years, and then that he can experience France to it’s fullest with a bit more maturity and less reliance on family than you would have at his current age. A good 3 or 4 years before he would be ready for International duty if he wanted to wait. Of course he already sounds good enough to accept a call up, and to cap himself, in the more immediate future (he’d have to be very very good in the case of the ABs), and he’ll get a great taste of that being with the Canes who have a bunch who are just a few years further into their career and looking likely Internationals themselves.
11 Go to commentsI remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.
3 Go to commentsOh wow… “But as La Rochelle proved in winning in Cape Town this season, a cross-continental away assignment need not spell the end of days.” La Rochelle actually proved quite the opposite. After traveling to Cape town and back they (back-to-back and current champs) got mercilessly thumped the next week. If travel is not the reason, why else would a full-strength powerhouse like La Rochelle get dumped on their @r$e$ one week later?
26 Go to commentsYou know he can land a winning conversion after the full time siren is up. (Even if it takes two attempts.)
5 Go to commentsA very insightful article from Jake. I would love to know how South African’s feel about their move to Europe. Do you prefer playing in Europe or want to go back to Super Rugby?
3 Go to commentspure fire
1 Go to commentsA very well thought out summary of all the relevant complications…agree with your ”refer the Cricket Test versus 20/20 comparison”. More also definitely doesn't necessarily mean better!
3 Go to commentsMust be something when you are only 19 y.o and both NZ and France want you. Btw he wasn’t the only new caledonian in french U20 as Robin Couly also lived in Noumea until 17. Hope he’s successful wherever he chooses to play.
11 Go to comments“Several key players in the Stade Rochelais squad are in their thirties” South Africans are going to hate the implications of that comment!
5 Go to commentsI know Leinster did a job on La Roche but shortly after HT Leinster were 30-13 ahead of them and at a similar time Toulouse were trailing Exeter. At 60 mins Leinster were 27 ahead but after 67 mins Toulouse were only 19 ahead before Exeter collapsed. That’s heavier scoring by Leinster against the Champions. I think people are looking at Toulouses total a little too much. I also think Northhampton are in with a real chance, albeit I’d put Leinster as favourites. If Leinster make the final I expect them to win by more than ten and with control.
5 Go to commentsHey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂
5 Go to commentsNot sure exactly what went wrong for him at Glasgow but it’s pretty clear he ain’t Franco’s cup of tea. Suspect he would have been better served heading out of Scotland around the same time as Finn, Hoggy and Jonny!
1 Go to commentsBulls disrespected the Northampton supporters and the competition. Decide quickly, fully in or out.
26 Go to commentsI wonder if Parling was ever on England’s radar as a coach? Obviously Borthwick is a great lineout coach, but I do worry he might be taking on too much as both head coach and forwards coach.
1 Go to commentsJason Jenkins has one cap. When Etzebeth was his age he had over 80 caps. Experience matters. He will never amount to what Etzebeth has because he hasn’t been developed as an international player.
2 Go to commentsSays much about the player picking this gig over the easier and bigger rewards offered to him in Japan. Also says a lot about the state sanctioned tax benefits the Irish Revenue offers pro rugby players, with their ten highest earning years subject to an additional 40% tax relief and paid as a lump sum, in cash, at retirement. Certainly helps Leinster line up the financial ducks in a row to fund marquee signings like this!!! No other union anywhere in world rugby benefits from this kind of lucrative financial sponsorship from their government…
5 Go to commentsTrue Jordie could earn a lot more in Japan. But by choosing Leinster he’ll be playing with 1 of the best clubs in the world and can win a champions cup and URC…..
6 Go to commentsThanks for that Marshy, noticed you didn't say who is gonna win it. We know who ain't gonna win it - your Crusaders outfit. They've gone from having arguably the best Super Rugby first five ever, to having a clutch of rookies. Hurricanes all the way!
1 Go to commentsGeez you really have to question the NRLs ability to produce players of quality. Its pathetic. Dont the 25mil in Aus produce enough quality womens players. Sad.
1 Go to commentsBulls fan here, and agree 100% with the conclusion (and little else) of this article. SA sides should absolutely f-off from the champs cup until we get fair scheduling, equal support for travel arrangements and home semis. You know, like all the european teams get.
26 Go to comments