Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Springboks blame game: 'I obviously did some big things wrong'

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Springboks head coach Jacques Nienaber has insisted his squad are ready to battle the Lions despite Saturday’s embarrassing 17-14 defeat in Cape Town for South Africa A versus Jake White’s Bulls who came from a 14-point interval deficit to surge to victory with a power-packed scoring burst in the last 15 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having defeated the Lions 17-13 last Wednesday, Nienaber wanted another South Africa A fixture to ensure as many players as possible in the virus-hit Springboks squad got some game time in the run-up to the three-game Test series against the Lions which begins in Cape Town next Saturday.

However, the last thing he would have bargained for was a South Africa A matchday squad containing nine 2019 World Cup-winning Springboks to lose to a franchise team that only last month were hammered by Italian side Benetton in the final of the Rainbow Cup.

Video Spacer

Ryan Wilson, Simon Zebo and Max Lahiff guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Ryan Wilson, Simon Zebo and Max Lahiff guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Nienaber accepted that the blame for the defeat, the second successive match in which South Africa A were held scoreless, should lie with him but in his defence, he explained that it wasn’t until lunchtime Friday that the official confirmation came through that his squad would play the Bulls as he claimed there was still a chance at that stage they could instead be facing the Lions, something the tourists insisted on Thursday would definitely not be happening.

Midfielder Damian de Allende, hooker Joseph Dweba and flanker Marco van Staden were the three repeat South Africa A starters from the win over the Lions who were starting a game for the second time in three days and converted tries from Aphelele Fassi and Wandisile Simelane had them 14 points clear at the break.

However, they failed to push on and were suckered by late converted tries from Keagan Johannes and Johan Grobbelaar before Chris Smith fired over a long-range 75th-minute penalty winner following a scrum infringement. Asked if this 17-14 South Africa A loss was an acceptable way for the Springboks to prepare for the Lions series, Nienaber said: “Are we ready? Yes, this was exactly what we wanted, not the loss but the game to give guys their opportunity to stake their claims for the Test in a week’s time.

“The result didn’t go our way, not what we hoped for but we got a lot of answers in terms of the questions that we had over certain players. We knew the Bulls is the best franchise in South Africa and hats off to them for giving us this game and we needed a game to give answers and I felt we got a lot.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You sit here quite emotional after a performance like that and if you give comments on individuals now it will be emotional comments. We have to go back and have a look at the game and have a look at individual performances. As a team, the performance wasn’t there. Some of them might have performed individually well but it didn’t come out as a team.

“It’s not the right place to go into individuals and say this guy or that guy (played well or poorly), but I felt we needed these questions asked of players under pressure to get some answers… I thought the Bulls were good and they were desperate. We knew they were going to be desperate. I have coached teams who have played national teams and your desperation levels are through the roof.

“The first finger must point at us as management, myself as the head coach. I obviously did some big things wrong in the build-up to this game. The Bulls were good. It’s sad to say but they were more desperate than us and it starts with me,” continued Nienaber, the Springboks defence coach before his promotion last year to the head coach role.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We only found out Friday lunchtime (that South Africa A would play the Bulls) and we didn’t do any analysis on them and yes, our pack wasn’t dominant. Normally we would do proper analysis on a team, how they contest, how they stop mauls, what their tactics are at scrum time. We didn’t do any of that because we just didn’t have time to analyse them because we only played on Wednesday.

“We are not looking for excuses but if you ask me did I expect a better pack performance in terms of set-pieces, yes. Definitely, we expected a proper set-piece platform for us to launch our attack off which we didn’t get today.”

Asked what the status was regarding the speculation the second and third Test games versus the Lions would be played in Cape Town rather than in Johannesburg as currently scheduled, Nienaber added: “I have got no clue. I try and stay clear of that as much as possible.

“For us as coaches, we just need to play. I am sure these organisers and medical committees will monitor those things and we must just trust their guidance and their feedback. Our job is to make sure we get this ready for Saturday. I don’t mind if we play in Cape Town or in Jo’burg.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 8 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 11 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

44 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me' Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me'
Search