The truth about rugby union and CVC's £15 billion private equity play
Speculation – some of it mild, some of it wild – has been swirling around CVC’s motives in the sport of rugby union: what are its plans, what does the future hold?
CVC’s Series 7 fund is the home of Premier Rugby HOLDCO ltd, the company that owns all the commercial rights for Premiership Rugby. It sits in a stable of CVC investments, which includes a variety of big-name companies and brands such as Breitling, Samsonite and Virgin Active gyms
To give you a greater sense of who else Premier Rugby have huddled under its ownership umbrella, we’re talking the likes of Norwegian technocrats, Saudi princes, school teachers in New Jersey, Exeter supporters and Nigel Wray.
Series 7 is responsible for £15 billion of other people’s money, a record amount raised for a private equity (PE) fund in Europe.
The majority of money entrusted to CVC (64 per cent) comes from large public pension and sovereign wealth funds. That money will be used to buy companies around the world. Indeed, more than 144 CVC deals have already been done globally.
In short: CVC is not just trying to grow revenue in rugby but also trying to ensure that people like public school teachers in the United States can retire. It has to be successful and like any financial enterprise, should it fail CVC will be answerable to investors.
That said, the chance of failure looks small, because the Series 7 is not a particularly risky fund.
Here’s how it works: CVC is made up of mid-size companies who perform well in their given sector and, for the most part, are more ‘traditional’ types of businesses. For example, the companies mentioned before.
This goes some way to explaining why CVC wanted to strike a deal with Premier Rugby which limits the downside of funding rugby to the clubs; to understand exactly what I mean you can find my thoughts on the deal itself here.
While it’s reassuring that CVC sees rugby union as part of a stable core of businesses it would be more interesting to know how they see it contributing to their portfolio.
The only indication we have can be found on the CVC website which highlights ‘predictable cash flow’. Sure, this might indicate why buying TV revenue is such a good idea – but what about the growth of the game? Its commitment to that is not so clear.
CVC would turn rugby union into the NFL overnight if it could – but before throwing obscene money at the sport it needs to satisfy the goals of the fund.
To understand this better it’s probably best to understand what motivates CVC. Like most private equity investors it has to generate a minimum level of annual return, which in financial-speak is what’s known as the ‘hurdle rate’.
S7 has a hurdle rate of 6 per cent, 2 per cent lower than the industry standard of 8%. That means CVC needs to exceed 6 per cent every year in order to benefit from further incentives, as I will now explain.
A fund like S7 earns fees in two ways: the first is an annual charge which is paid regardless of performance (a typical charge will be in the region of 2 per cent of the fund’s value).
The second charge will be a share of the profits once the hurdle rate is exceeded. This could be as high as 20 per cent for any profit made in excess of that previously referenced 6 per cent.
As you can see, growth is important but yearly targets are more important. So don’t expect anything too radical in the near future as cash flow is king.
One of the advantages of PE investment is time. That is why it’s suitable for organisations with lots of money who don’t need it in the immediate future – for example pension funds.
Ultimately this long term strategy is a benefit to rugby union.
CVC will provide its acquired companies with all manner of advisory services. It will certainly change the management structure and then wait until they finally ‘exit’ the investment, usually via a listing on an exchange or a private sale.
Already we can see CVC making moves in that area, through a management restructure of Premier Rugby. Darren Childs has been appointed as CEO and a new CMO, Zoe Clapp, has just started. (Childs’ predecessor Mark McCafferty, meanwhile, has gone to CVC.)
Such structural changes are to some degree expected – but as Leicester Tigers have shown in recent years, recruitment can be fraught with difficulty.
There must be some doubts about Childs and Clapp who, despite impressive backgrounds, have no discernible track record of growing a sport. Time will tell.
One must also question what CVC sees in Premier Rugby. Does it feel as if the sport can take over the world or are their motives more opportunistic? Has it taken advantage of a sport which, outwardly, often appears in a state of flux and one beset by infighting?
“That has held them back in the performance because it was not where would have expected, certainly against France."@LewisMoody7 tells @heagneyl he thinks the Saracens elephant might still be in the room #ENGvIRE ?????????https://t.co/3CDkTpFoSI
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) February 23, 2020
Whatever the plans for rugby in the northern hemisphere the man to ask is a guy called Nick Clarry. Clarry is one of 29 managing partners at CVC and he oversees its activities in the sports, media and entertainment markets. Alongside fellow managing partner Pev Hooper, he is a director of Premier Rugby HOLDCO.
If Clarry’s name sounds familiar to you, it might because he was heavily involved with CVC dealings in Formula One and was often seen at races alongside the fund’s co-founder, Donald Mackenzie.
According to The Telegraph one of the main reasons CVC stuck with F1 for so long is down to Mackenzie, who fell in love with the sport. Either that, or he fell in love with the fact CVC made £2.8 to £3 billion out of F1 (depending on which reports you read).
There is little to suggest Clarry’s love of rugby comes anywhere near his friend’s admiration of F1. On the contrary, Clarry appears to have a more refined palette, preferring the arts to the rough and tumble of the AJ Bell Stadium. Clarry, as it happens, is the chairman of the Old Vic Theatre Trust.
Make no mistake, rugby union is a very small investment for CVC. Of the billions of pounds invested the question is how will Premiership Rugby battle for attention ahead of the watchmakers, aircraft manufacturers and private hospitals also owned by CVC? Only Clarry and his colleagues can answer that – but one suspects it might have plenty to do with the real prize – the Six Nations.
Rugby’s pact with CVC is deeply flawed – but it is not exactly a deal with the devil. Premiership owners are smart people who can live with the consequences of their deal – but will fans stomach the sale of the Six Nations under similar terms? Do they even matter? I’m sure they wish the teachers of the Louisiana school system well in their retirement – but not at the expense of our game.
Comments on RugbyPass
pure fire
1 Go to commentsA very well thought out summary of all the relevant complications…agree with your ”refer the Cricket Test versus 20/20 comparison”. More also definitely doesn't necessarily mean better!
1 Go to commentsMust be something when you are only 19 y.o and both NZ and France want you. Btw he wasn’t the only new caledonian in french U20 as Robin Couly also lived in Noumea until 17. Hope he’s successful wherever he chooses to play.
7 Go to comments“Several key players in the Stade Rochelais squad are in their thirties” South Africans are going to hate the implications of that comment!
5 Go to commentsI know Leinster did a job on La Roche but shortly after HT Leinster were 30-13 ahead of them and at a similar time Toulouse were trailing Exeter. At 60 mins Leinster were 27 ahead but after 67 mins Toulouse were only 19 ahead before Exeter collapsed. That’s heavier scoring by Leinster against the Champions. I think people are looking at Toulouses total a little too much. I also think Northhampton are in with a real chance, albeit I’d put Leinster as favourites. If Leinster make the final I expect them to win by more than ten and with control.
5 Go to commentsHey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂
5 Go to commentsNot sure exactly what went wrong for him at Glasgow but it’s pretty clear he ain’t Franco’s cup of tea. Suspect he would have been better served heading out of Scotland around the same time as Finn, Hoggy and Jonny!
1 Go to commentsBulls disrespected the Northampton supporters and the competition. Decide quickly, fully in or out.
25 Go to commentsI wonder if Parling was ever on England’s radar as a coach? Obviously Borthwick is a great lineout coach, but I do worry he might be taking on too much as both head coach and forwards coach.
1 Go to commentsJason Jenkins has one cap. When Etzebeth was his age he had over 80 caps. Experience matters. He will never amount to what Etzebeth has because he hasn’t been developed as an international player.
2 Go to commentsSays much about the player picking this gig over the easier and bigger rewards offered to him in Japan. Also says a lot about the state sanctioned tax benefits the Irish Revenue offers pro rugby players, with their ten highest earning years subject to an additional 40% tax relief and paid as a lump sum, in cash, at retirement. Certainly helps Leinster line up the financial ducks in a row to fund marquee signings like this!!! No other union anywhere in world rugby benefits from this kind of lucrative financial sponsorship from their government…
5 Go to commentsTrue Jordie could earn a lot more in Japan. But by choosing Leinster he’ll be playing with 1 of the best clubs in the world and can win a champions cup and URC…..
6 Go to commentsThanks for that Marshy, noticed you didn't say who is gonna win it. We know who ain't gonna win it - your Crusaders outfit. They've gone from having arguably the best Super Rugby first five ever, to having a clutch of rookies. Hurricanes all the way!
1 Go to commentsGeez you really have to question the NRLs ability to produce players of quality. Its pathetic. Dont the 25mil in Aus produce enough quality womens players. Sad.
1 Go to commentsBulls fan here, and agree 100% with the conclusion (and little else) of this article. SA sides should absolutely f-off from the champs cup until we get fair scheduling, equal support for travel arrangements and home semis. You know, like all the european teams get.
25 Go to commentsI’m yet to see why Grace would be an ABs contender. He’s pedestrian and lacks the dominance required of a top flight 8.
11 Go to commentsGee my Highlanders were terrible. They have gone backwards since the start of the season. The trouble began when we left Millar behind to prep as the 10 against the Brumbies and he was disconnected from the team that came back from Aussie. We rested Patchell for that game and we blew an avalanche of ball in good attacking positions in the 1st half. Against the Rebels we seem to of gone into a pod system with forwards hanging off from the breakdown leaving Fakatava to secure our ball!
80 Go to commentsPot Kettle, the English and French teams have done it for years.
25 Go to commentsHas virtually played every minute of previous games. Back row of Li Lo Willie , Grace and Blackadder would be the 1. Crusaders issue is a very average 1st 5 who cannot run. Kicking in general play is also below par They need to put Yong Kemara in. He must have so.e talent for them to bring him down from Waikato. Hoehepa would struggle to play in so.e club sided
11 Go to commentsI hope this a good thing making all these changes!
3 Go to comments