Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Report: Paper reveal judge's findings in Etzebeth racism row

By Online Editors
(Photo by Steve Haag/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

Former Judge Johann van der Westhuizen has found after conducting a thorough internal investigation that Springbok lock Eben Etzebeth is not guilty of either racism or assault. Etzebeth was accused of both after an incident last year at a Cape West Coast nightclub in Langebaan but has now been cleared of both charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although this decision was reached some time back SA Rugby was advised not to make it public at the time.

Van der Westhuizen has made the following findings in the case, which was revealed by the Rapport.

Video Spacer

Jacques Burger talks to Big Jim

Video Spacer

Jacques Burger talks to Big Jim

The report’s findings: He could find no grounds whatsoever to proceed with the charges; SA Rugby was advised to have a meeting with Etzebeth to discuss the consequences of these charges and how they could reflect on him; SA Rugby was also advised to have meetings with all Springboks to discuss this issue and how it could affect the public perception of them in the future.

Following these discussions, SA Rugby has now declared the matter closed and does not see any reason to continue with the investigation.

Due to the sensitive relationship between employer and employee, it was also heard that the sports governing body received legal advice at the time not to make the results of this investigation open to the public.

Etzebeth’s attorney, Andre Calitz, has said they welcomed the clearing of his client’s name.

“From the beginning, we’ve found it was unnecessary to change our case. Eben has not pleaded guilty at any stage to defamation or assault and has maintained his innocence at all times,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Calitz stated that it was just further proof of his innocence when he was informed of the findings of the investigation.

SA Rugby did not make the findings of the report known to the Etzebeth camp at the time but Van der Westhuizen confirmed that both the police and the South African Human Rights Commission (HRC) also investigated the matter.

However, HRC chairman Bongani Majola has stated that their Equality Court case is still pending until the hate speech charges against former broadcaster Jon Qwelane have been resolved. It is not clear when that will happen.

According to a report, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) declared they haven’t decided on whether to prosecute Etzebeth yet.

ADVERTISEMENT

Eric Ntabazalila, the spokesperson for the NPA in the Western Cape has said that the prosecutor for the case hasn’t indicated to him why there has been no decision in the case as it’s now been 11 months since this incident occurred.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 6 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jean Kleyn's season ending injury could be worse than first thought Jean Kleyn's season ending injury worse than thought
Search