Northern | US

Melbourne Rebels face yet more problems in fight to stay alive


Rebels players react after conceding the first try of the match during the round four Super Rugby Pacific match between Melbourne Rebels and Queensland Reds at AAMI Park, on March 15, 2024, in Melbourne, Australia. (Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

A vote to save the Melbourne Rebels may prove to be only a stay of execution, with the debt-ridden Super Rugby Pacific club facing further hurdles in its bid to stay alive.

ADVERTISEMENT

Creditors on Friday voted to accept a proposal by a private investor group that includes current directors rather than liquidate the club, which has debts of more than $23 million.

The consortium, involving former Qantas chairman Leigh Clifford, proposed a Deed Of Company Arrangement (DOCA), which guaranteed employees 100 per cent of their entitlements but would leave unsecured creditors with as little as 15 cents to the dollar.

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Chasing the Sun on RugbyPass TV | RPTV

Chasing the Sun, the extraordinary documentary that traces the Springboks’ road to victory at the 2019 Rugby World Cup, is coming to RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Committing to an investment of more than $25 million over the next five years, the plan involves a move to Melbourne’s western suburbs to share facilities with A-League club Western United.

The proposal was recommended by PwC voluntary administrator Stephen Longley, who also said in his report last week that the club may have operated insolvent for more than five years.

Fixture
Super Rugby Pacific
Rebels
11 - 38
Full-time
Blues
All Stats and Data

It’s believed Longley had the deciding vote on Friday after the creditor vote was tied.

However, the DOCA is dependent upon the Rebels regaining the Super Rugby participation licence from Rugby Australia (RA), which took control when the club entered voluntary administration in January.

RA, which has propped up the club this season, taking over the wages bill for players and staff, has given no indication of its plans for the club, who joined the competition in 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s believed RA voted against salvaging the club, with the Australian Financial Review reporting that the governing body claimed the independent report by Longley was biased towards the former directors.

The Rebels’ second obstacle is the Australia Tax Office, which also voted against the proposal, a source told AAP.

As well as the licence, the new deal is dependent on the ATO releasing the directors from their personal liability over the club’s $11.5 million in tax debts.

The likelihood is that the matter will end up in the courts, leaving players, coaches and Rebels staff in limbo.

ADVERTISEMENT

The meeting occurred just hours before the Rebels were scheduled to host the Blues in a Super Rugby Pacific match at AAMI Park on Friday night.

Including this weekend’s round, there are only five matches remaining before finals, with Melbourne on target to make the playoffs for the first time.

Consortium spokesperson Georgia Widdup welcomed the successful vote and urged the governing body to support the new plan for rugby in the state.

“The Melbourne Rebels are an integral part of the sporting fabric of the state and play a critical role in making Melbourne the sporting capital of the world,” she said in a statement.

“Today’s decision ensures the women’s and men’s club can progress plans for our financially sustainable future.

“There is still a lot of work to do, but with the vote out of the way and a lot of community and government goodwill behind the club, we can finally get excited about what the future holds, and we urge Rugby Australia to support rugby in Victoria.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 16 minutes ago
'Entirely different to what the referees asked for': All Blacks assistant on South African TV director's influence

That is completely untrue. The broadcaster controlling the big screen shows whatever they want completely independent of the referee or TMO. When the referee requested to see something on the big screen, the broadcaster controls it, not the TMO. The TMO does not control the TV replays in these games. I went to the ABs game in Paris in 2024 and the big screen was constantly showing replays of ABs infringements. Not once did they show anything the other way. Likewise I went to France vs Ireland earlier this year and France won convincingly but honestly the big screen at the ground was worth 14 points for France. I was a neutral for that game, and in fact probably cheering for France, but it was disgraceful. Totally fair if it works both ways in the same game, but siting an example from 15 years ago seems a bit desperate. I am saying the call was right. Roigard was offside. But if only one team benefits from constant replays, regardless of which team is benefiting, then it is unfair. Where are the replays of Marx crawling over the try line? - not shown at all at the ground. How painful was it to get the replay of the high shot on Barrett? Listen to it over again, the TMO had to keep requesting different angles, it was not freeze framed at any point, and it was not shown live at the ground after the incident. The only reason it was checked is because Barrett didn’t get up afterwards. Defend it all you like while it benefits you I guess.

52 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close