Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

France player ratings vs England | 2025 Six Nations

By Josh Raisey at Allianz Stadium, Twickenham
Antoine Dupont of France looks dejected following the team's defeat during the Guinness Six Nations 2025 match between England and France at Twickenham Stadium on February 08, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

France player ratings: France’s hopes of a Grand Slam were shattered at Twickenham’s Allianz Stadium on Saturday, as England struck late to win 26-25 in round two of the Guinness Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

The visitors will wonder what might have been if their handling was better in a match defined by dropped passes. Almost no player came away from this match without at least one knock-on to their name, and they paid the price.

Some rare off days for some superstars and Les Bleus are now relying on other results to go their way this Championship.

Here’s how the players rated:

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
2
4
Tries
3
3
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
96
Carries
134
8
Line Breaks
9
11
Turnovers Lost
19
6
Turnovers Won
3

15 Thomas Ramos – 5
A poor miss from the tee early on which came after some loose kicking out of hand. Shared the first-receiver role with Matthieu Jalibert, or even had the lion’s share in a match where he saw a lot of action- he wasn’t without errors though. Didn’t seem particularly interested in tackling Ollie Lawrence for England’s opening try of the match.

14 Damian Penaud – 5
Returning after missing the victory over Wales in round one and looked lively. Now sits just one try away from Serge Blanco on France’s all-time charts, though he will rue a couple of handling errors in positions many would have expected a world-class winger to score from- such errors defined the match in the end. Had no problem assisting his Bordeaux team-mate Louis Bielle-Biarrey with a perfectly weighted grubber to open the scoring.

13 Pierre-Louis Barassi – 5.5
Linked up very well with Moefana in the midfield, coming short to flummox England’s defence a few times. Caught out for the match-winner by leaving a gaping hole for Elliot Daly to run through.

12 Yoram Moefana – 6
Handled every runner that came down his channel and made some punchy carries with ball in hand. Could have mis-timed the pass for the late try, but executed well as he did with everything in the match.

ADVERTISEMENT

11 Louis Bielle-Biarrey – 5
Sloppy handling error early on when France had made a promising break down the left flank. That did not deter him as he came off his wing to devastating effect throughout. He was the culprit of a sloppy pass after the break when he broke down the left flank- he did everything perfectly but for the final pass. Comfortably beaten by Tommy Freeman in the air for England’s second try of the match. Would have thought he scored the match-winner late on, but was caught marking no-one as England scored the winner minutes later.

10 Matthieu Jalibert – 4
Filling in for the suspended Romain Ntamack, and had a similar performance in the No.10 jersey with Antoine Dupont taking on the playmaking responsibilities alongside Ramos. Such was the case that he was even taken off after an hour, with Dupont moving to fly-half.

9 Antoine Dupont – 5
By Antoine Dupont’s insuperable standards, this was not vintage. Controlled the game with both feet and mixed his kicking to keep Marcus Smith guessing. But he had a few sloppy passes in him, including a hospital pass to Alexandre Roumat. Looked to be in for a certain try soon after, but spilt a pass with the try line beckoning. Had the ball ripped from his clutches by Tom Curry just metres from England’s line early in the second 40. Not too bad by a normal player’s standards, but for Dupont, this was quite error-strewn. There were, of course, still moments of pure genius.

1 Jean-Baptiste Gros – 5
Pinged at the scrum when up against an opposite man in Will Stuart who had a size advantage. Had referee Nika Amashukeli watching him like a hawk at the scrum, which is never a great sign. Dynamic in the loose, which saw him covering a grubber into the corner in defence.

ADVERTISEMENT

2 Peato Mauvaka – 4
His nonchalant offload to no-one inadvertently helped his side as Dupont snapped up the loose ball and France were scoring the first try of the match seconds later. But that sums up the supreme confidence he is playing with currently, which included a cheeky one-handed lineout throw. That insouciance cost him though when he effectively missed an open goal when he tried to catch an admittedly wayward pass one-handed when a try looked a certainty. Won a crucial turnover deep in his 22 soon before being taken off.

3 Uini Atonio – 5
Though he couldn’t get the better of Ellis Genge in the opening 50 minutes, he had more success against Fin Baxter. Was taken off immediately after winning a scrum penalty against the Harlequin though.

4 Alexandre Roumat – 4
Put England’s lineout under huge pressure as a front jumper, but had quite a few handling errors in him- one notably early in the second half when France were on the edge of England’s 22. Only lasted 50 minutes.

Related

5 Emmanuel Meafou – 6
Metres after contact were sensational, which would be expected from a 145kg player. Pivotal to how France play now.

6 Francois Cros – 6
The catalyst for Les Bleus’ opening try by distributing from the deck as soon as he pounced on a loose ball- a small touch but the hallmark of a team and a player at full confidence. Strong defensive effort.

7 Paul Boudehent – 4
A quiet 50 minutes on the field. Penalised on one occasion for holding on, but was left isolated when supporting Ramos.

8 Gregory Alldritt – 7
Player of the match last week and started this match in a similar vein, charging down a kick from Fin Smith in what was the Englishman’s first touch in his first Test start. Followed that up by marching George Martin backwards, which is no mean feat. Had a great battle with England’s lock in the midfield, with both trading huge shots. Even he had one knock-on, but was as reliable as ever.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
2.6
10
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
2.3
8
Entries

Replacements
16 Julien Marchand – 4
Bowled over as Baxter powered over from close range as England scored their third try of the match.

17 Cyril Baille – 5
Produced some meaty carries in his 25-minute cameo.

18 Georges-Henri Colombe – 4
Gave away a scrum penalty, which gave England the field position for their third try. Fabien Galthie may regret making the change for Atonio, then again, he couldn’t last much longer.

19 Hugo Auradou – 4
In his third cap, the Pau man was penalised within seconds of coming on for holding on after taking the restart.

20 Mickael Guillard – 5
A nice touch kept the ball alive for France’s late score.

21 Oscar Jegou – 5
Fairly industrious from the bench, but not with a great impact.

22 Nolann Le Garrec – 5
A quiet cameo at the end.

23 Emilien Gailleton- N/A 

Related

Download the RugbyPass app now!

News, stats, live rugby and more! Download the new RugbyPass app on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

36 Comments
N
NK 32 days ago

The fact that France lost by one point but this platform has rated them 50 points less than the England squad overall (even with England having one less player rated!) shows how much better the France roster is in the authors’ eyes.

Either Galthie has 2027 preparation underway already with that inexperienced bench or there’s arrogance/stupidity involved. Also, with the abundance of quality players in (almost) every position, it seems insane to leave an unused sub.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

Extra headwinds for France today:


--Massive English pressure removing the space that French players wanted to run into and at breakdown.

--England deliberatley keeping the ball on the field to create more fatigue for French forwards and backs. It created fatigue for England also but they were planning for it.

--If the above kept the match close then scoreboard pressure would add to the above. Scoreboard pressure in the context of this match was England being within a score.


All of the above might also affect France's accuracy even when pressure was not as intense (eg gathering restarts)


England's plan was to hang in, and be in with a shout going down the final sstratch. France's plan was a more decisive win.


Also note if the plan thats working on the field is England's then the collective hive mind is reinforced, focused and doubles down. For the team on the field who's plan isnt working then the collective hive mind can be doubtful and manifest in individual errors as we saw.


England substitutions were aimed at bringing experience on and winning late penalties (via jacklers). Winning late penalties is the tries and tested methos of closing tight matches (eg SA via scrums).


France didn't go away. Bielle Biarrays try was amazing. They just could not shake the cumulative pressure England, the elements and match were exerting on them and failed to close from winning positions twice.


In Ireland we know England well. Their tenacity is extremely admirable, we saw it last year in Twickenham where they found a way and on many other occasions. NZ saw it in 2019. They met their match in collective team 'will' in the RWC semi.


England actually put it up to Ireland last week, but Ireland found a way out. Ireland and England looked close in standard whereas France look a bit ahead even given the loss yesterday. France's new task is maximum points from remaining matches to be relatively certain of the title. Its a four horse race.


Dupont makes the killer play for all 3 French tries. His general play is good and yet he gets a 5?

Dupont's play for the last French try to appear indecisive in his own 22 and honey pot 5 England players before releasing Penaud was genius. That should have been the winning French score. Massive credit to England coming back and to Fin Smith for executing that set end of match winning play (from the training ground).

J
JW 36 days ago

They all got Dmac ratings.


Does Galthie have someone in France he can get back?

J
JWH 36 days ago

Everybody in here saying the ratings aren't fair need to straighten themselves out. 27 handling errors is enough to half anybody's score in ratings. Not to mention that these are the supposed favourites to boot.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

If England don't get that jackal and score from that set play then you can add 2 to every French players score.

Dupont was directly involved in France's three tries as well as setting up several nailed on try opportunities. This was all in spite of an excellent English game plan to dominate the space that the players he wanted to pass to.

Ireland showed what to do last week. Don't go wide too early and tie up key England defenders in rucks before going.

Didn't the French coaches watch that match?

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

England pressured France early which clearly unsettled them. You could see it in most faces including Duponts. England's tactic of keeping the ball in play and intensity high had a major effect on France. Greasy ball, pressure, fatigue, affected France.

It looked the whole game they had a nagging doubt they might lose and it became a self fulfilling prophesy. Missing both restarts after both England's late tries is criminal.


Bringing on the second Curry later to get more Jackal pens which might win a close game worked a treat.


England right back in the tournament now. Great performance by Fin Smith.

Looks like England have found their no 10.


I don't think the French were arrogant. But I do think some of the noise around them and Dupont might have seaped in.


From a coaching perspective I am surprised that they were surprised by the intensity England showed.

G
GH 36 days ago

The day after Ireland-England, the french staff noted the english aggressivity. So no surprise here. And in spite of this aggressivity, France was close to the english line and lost six opportunities for bad handlings. With three more tries this is 15 to 21 more points and there is no question about the supposed effectiveness of the english aggressivity. Were the game played ten times, France would win nine out of ten. The stars were not aligned yesterday.

T
TI 36 days ago

5 is a bit harsh a grade for Dupont, and that’s saying something coming from a guy who’s sick and tired of the absurd Dupont-GOAT claims.

Yes, he’s had one of his worse games, and he wasn’t the best scrum half on the pitch today (a rare sight such as it is), but he was better than 5.

5 is an average player, not someone who was directly involved in two of his team’s three tries.

The French lost by one singular point, yet their average rating looks like a half of that of England players.

Yes, England were the slightly better team today, but it was by units of per cent, not by a factor of two.

Time to bring some objective standard into the grading, because this is absurd.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

He was directly involved in all 3.

Try 1 his run and reverse pass to Penaud opened England. Try two his skip pass to Bialle Biarray means simple try. Try 3 he honey pots 5 English players in the 22 before releasing Penaud.

C
Cantab 36 days ago

I fully agree. A 1 point loss is scarcely a hiding and perhaps England deserve some credit for the upset. Just needs France to knock over Ireland now.

T
Tom 36 days ago

I do broadly agree but I would say that I think the poor French grading is reflective not just of the narrow loss but that a lot of their players played well below their potential.

S
Soliloquin 36 days ago

27(!) handling errors by France. That is appalling.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

Weather

Fatigue due to England tactic of long periods of continuous in ball play

High intensity clever pressing game.

Scoreboard pressure

Doubt in the collective mind due to all of the above

England used tactics on a rainy day to make lots of things go wrong for France.

P
PR 36 days ago

Gutsy win by England but France were awful for the most part. Forwards looked unfit and handling was a joke - even if you consider the conditions. Bielle-Biarrey still can't catch a high ball to save his life and Jalibert is not international class. Just shows you -if Dupont doesn't fire France fall apart easily.

T
TI 36 days ago

France are a top outfit, and they don’t miraculously just turn awful and unfit.

Every team plays only as good as the opposition allows them to. France were poor, because England put them under a lot of pressure at the breakdown, and through kicking.

Deserved win for England, and I rarely root for them.

R
Rucknroller 36 days ago

Well at least this piece is an observation as to how off the usual pace France were today. So many unforced handling errors and basic mistakes being made.

Great result for England but this game doesn't suddenly mean they have exorcised the demons of what has been a particularly poor run in the Borthwick era.

Glad to see them close out the game and thrive in what became a very unstructured match, definitely shows promise. But a long way to go before any bold statements about the team's potential can be made.

U
Utiku Old Boy 36 days ago

Agreed completely.

W
WL 36 days ago

Good for England good for the Six Nations. Now for a Scotland upset against Ireland. Turned out the SN are not as boring as initially expected.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

The six nations are rarely boring. Glad you've had your preconceptions straightened out.

H
Harlech 36 days ago

Truly appalling performance. No need to point a finger but clearly current setup hasn't worked. Got nothing to lose now to let Gatland and his team go

J
JW 36 days ago

Bit soon to replace Galthie imo.

U
Utiku Old Boy 36 days ago

Very sloppy game by both sides and only the close nature made it a gripping watch for the neutral. That either side could have won it was down to mistakes and poor finishing. France lost considerable credibility and the comp looks like Ireland's to lose.

R
RedWarrior 36 days ago

No its wide open now. France hold onto those passes in the first half they go in 21 or 28 up and its over. They have every chance of winning in Dublin (and I'm Irish).

They have a very serious hurdle to cross first tomorrow.

f
fl 36 days ago

I think it was always Irelands to lose. Coming to Twickenham is always going to be difficult (when Marcus Smith isn't playing 10) and I think sloppiness has to be put down to good defence moreso than bad attack

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Barron Johnstown 1 hour ago
Mixed Wales update on availability of Josh Adams, Gareth Anscombe

As a businessman, I’ve always taken my finances seriously, especially when dealing with cryptocurrencies. Over time, I built a $400,000 Bitcoin wallet, which was a significant part of my business operations. I was careful with my security and never thought something like this would happen to me. So, when I woke up one morning to find my Bitcoin wallet completely empty, I couldn’t believe my eyes. My $400,000 was gone. It felt like a nightmare. I had fallen victim to a phishing attack, one that at first seemed completely legitimate, and I hadn’t even questioned it. The feeling of loss was overwhelming. My hard-earned Bitcoin was gone, and I had no idea how to recover it. I frantically searched for solutions, hoping there was a way to get my funds back. I contacted my wallet provider, but they told me that once the funds were transferred, there was nothing they could do. I felt helpless and devastated, thinking that my Bitcoin was lost forever. Then, one day, I saw a post on LinkedIn from a fellow business owner in my network. She shared a story about how Blockchain Cyber Retrieve had helped her recover lost assets after a phishing attack. Her post was full of praise for the company’s quick service and expertise in recovering both private and commercial funds. This resonated with me, and I thought, "If they could help her, maybe they could help me too. I reached out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve, and from the very first contact, I could tell that I was dealing with professionals. The representative who responded was empathetic and assured me that they could help recover my funds. They didn’t treat me like just another case—they treated me like a person facing a serious issue. They immediately got to work, asking for the necessary details and beginning the recovery process. The team worked quickly and efficiently. I received constant updates and was able to track the progress of my recovery in real-time. They used cutting-edge tools and techniques to trace the stolen Bitcoin, and within a couple of days, I received the best news I could have hoped for: my wallet was restored in full. All $400,000 was back in my possession, But Blockchain Cyber Retrieve didn’t stop there. They not only recovered my funds but also shared valuable advice on securing my cryptocurrency for the future. They helped me improve my wallet’s security, advised on using multi-signature authentication, and suggested ways to train my staff to recognize phishing scams. This proactive approach gave me the confidence to protect my assets going forward. Thanks to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve, I was able to save my business from a devastating loss. I learned a valuable lesson about securing my crypto assets and am now much more diligent about protecting my funds. If you ever find yourself in a similar situation, trust me when I say: Blockchain Cyber Retrieve is the team you want on your side.

CONTACT INFO:

WhatsApp:+ 1{520 564 8 300}

Email: blockchaincyberretrieve{@} post . com

8 Go to comments
J
Jahmirwayle 1 hour ago
Can 'great' Gibson-Park best 'freakish' Dupont in scrum-half clash for the ages?

It started with a gut-wrenching realization. I’d been duped. Months earlier, I’d poured $133,000 into what I thought was a golden opportunity a cryptocurrency investment platform promising astronomical returns. The website was sleek, the testimonials glowed, and the numbers in my account dashboard climbed steadily. I’d watched my Bitcoin grow, or so I thought, until the day I tried to withdraw it. That’s when the excuses began: “Processing delays,” “Additional verification required,” and finally, a demand for a hefty “release fee.” Then, silence. The platform vanished overnight, taking my money with it. I was left staring at a blank screen, my savings gone, and a bitter taste of shame in my mouth.I didn’t know where to turn. The police shrugged cybercrime was a black hole they couldn’t navigate. Friends offered sympathy but no solutions. I spent sleepless nights scouring forums, reading about others who’d lost everything to similar scams. That’s when I stumbled across a thread mentioning a group specializing in crypto recovery. They didn’t promise miracles, but they had a reputation for results. Desperate, I reached out.The first contact was a breath of fresh air. I sent an email explaining my situation dates, transactions, screenshots, everything I could scrape together. Within hours, I got a reply. No fluff, no false hope, just a clear request for more details and a promise to assess my case. I hesitated, wary of another scam, but something about their professionalism nudged me forward. I handed over my evidence: the wallet addresses I’d sent my Bitcoin to, the emails from the fake platform, even the login credentials I’d used before the site disappeared.The process kicked off fast. They explained that scammers often move funds through a web of wallets to obscure their tracks, but Bitcoin’s blockchain leaves a trail if you know how to follow it. That’s where their expertise came in. They had tools and know-how I couldn’t dream of, tracing the flow of my coins across the network. I didn’t understand the technical jargon hash rates, mixing services, cold wallets but I didn’t need to. They kept me in the loop with updates: “We’ve identified the initial transfer,” “The funds split here,” “We’re narrowing down the endpoints.” Hours passed , and I oscillated between hope and dread. Then came the breakthrough. They’d pinpointed where my Bitcoin had landed a cluster of wallets tied to the scammers. Some of it had been cashed out, but a chunk remained intact, sitting in a digital vault the crooks thought was untouchable. I didn’t ask too many questions about that part; I just wanted results. They pressured the right points, leveraging the blockchain evidence to freeze the wallets holding my funds before the scammers could liquidate them. Next morning, I woke up to an email that made my heart skip. “We’ve secured access to a portion of your assets.” Not all of it some had slipped through the cracks but $133,000 worth of Bitcoin, my original investment, was recoverable. They walked me through the final steps: setting up a secure wallet, verifying the transfer, watching the coins land. When I saw the balance tick up on my screen, I sat there, stunned. It was real. My money was back.The ordeal wasn’t painless. I’d lost time, sleep, and a bit of faith in humanity. But the team at Alpha Spy Nest Recovery turned a nightmare into a second chance.  I’ll never forget what they did. In a world full of thieves, they were the ones who fought to make things right. Contacts below: email: Alphaspynest@mail.com, WhatsApp: +14159714490‬, Telegram: https://t.me/Alphaspynest

8 Go to comments
J
Jahmirwayle 2 hours ago
'Monumental' TV deal keeps Six Nations on terrestrial TV

They had tools and know-how I couldn’t dream of, tracing the flow of my coins across the network. I didn’t understand the technical jargon hash rates, mixing services, cold wallets but I didn’t need to. They kept me in the loop with updates: “We’ve identified the initial transfer,” “The funds split here,” “We’re narrowing down the endpoints.” Hours passed , and I oscillated between hope and dread. Then came the breakthrough. They’d pinpointed where my Bitcoin had landed a cluster of wallets tied to the scammers. Some of it had been cashed out, but a chunk remained intact, sitting in a digital vault the crooks thought was untouchable. I didn’t ask too many questions about that part; I just wanted results. They pressured the right points, leveraging the blockchain evidence to freeze the wallets holding my funds before the scammers could liquidate them. Next morning, I woke up to an email that made my heart skip. “We’ve secured access to a portion of your assets.” Not all of it some had slipped through the cracks but $133,000 worth of Bitcoin, my original investment, was recoverable. They walked me through the final steps: setting up a secure wallet, verifying the transfer, watching the coins land. When I saw the balance tick up on my screen, I sat there, stunned. It was real. My money was back.The ordeal wasn’t painless. I’d lost time, sleep, and a bit of faith in humanity. But the team at Alpha Spy Nest Recovery turned a nightmare into a second chance.  I’ll never forget what they did. In a world full of thieves, they were the ones who fought to make things right. Contacts below: email: Alphaspynest@mail.com, WhatsApp: +14159714490

0 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Was Dublin drubbing the end of an era or a bump in the road for Ireland? Was Dublin drubbing the end of an era or a bump in the road for Ireland?
Search