Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Courtney Lawes has his Lions say after recent Henderson criticism

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Courtney Lawes has sidestepped recent criticism from Iain Henderson that he was only selected due to favouritism rather than form during the recent Lions tour which ended in a 2-1 series defeat to the Springboks in Cape Town. Henderson went on the trip as one of the form Ireland players at the end of the Guinness Six Nations but he was overlooked for the Test series.   

ADVERTISEMENT

This was in contrast to Lawes who missed most of England’s miserable Six Nations through injury, yet he went on to start all three Lions Tests in South Africa at blindside. Not getting a run grated with Henderson, who recently singled out how Lawes was a favoured Gatland pick despite his lack of games in 2021.  

A bit of evidence of that would be Courtney Lawes, for example. Hadn’t played a lot of rugby, was injured going in, missed a lot of rugby, comes in as a bit of a surprise maybe and starts all three Tests,” claimed Henderson when interviewed on BBC Sport Northern Ireland’s Ulster Rugby Show.

Video Spacer

Courtney Lawes guests on RugbyPass All Access

Video Spacer

Courtney Lawes guests on RugbyPass All Access

“Don’t get me wrong, Courtney is a class player and he probably deserved to be playing, but that would lead you to believe that he [Gatland] wasn’t picking on who was on form at that stage because Courtney had already banked his form from before. He [Gatland] told me I had trained really well, played really well and it unfortunately just didn’t work out the way I wanted it to be… at the end of the day it’s the top dog’s decision and I wasn’t there.”

Lawes made his post-Lions returning to playing with a 25-minute appearance off the Northampton bench in last Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership win over London Irish, but he opted not to directly dwell on Henderson’s comments during an appearance on this week’s edition of The Rugby Pod.

In reviewing the Lions tour, Lawes said: “I don’t pay much attention to that kind of stuff. I rarely read rugby news, any kind of rugby news, because people have an opinion and everyone’s opinion is different so give your opinion if people want to hear it, that’s absolutely fine. No problem with me but it is going to go straight over my head regardless of what it is.”

Lawes admitted he was unsure of where he stood in the run-up to the early May squad announcement as he never received the ‘Save the Date’ email that other players in Lions contention were sent. “A few emails got sent about to loads of people and as far as I know I didn’t get one,” he explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was thinking that it means I’m nowhere near the squad… or I am in, do you know what I mean? It was a kind of save the date thing. I’d played two games for England before I got injured again and hadn’t played before the Lions team got picked, so I wasn’t too confident in my chances but I knew playing South Africa and with my experience, there was always a chance.

“I was just thankful to be given the opportunity to start and to be able to play a Lions Test. I wasn’t feeling too much pressure. Obviously, there were a bit of nerves and stuff but I was quite excited to go out and play and I knew that I could perform at that level. I didn’t feel like I had too much to worry about.

“Personally we should have won it. It was there for the taking but rugby can happen like that and especially that last Test, it was the flip of a coin. A couple of decisions, a couple of balls bouncing either way and that game is a completely different game. We were disappointed but I was happy to be there and give everything I had and I thought that is what I did. I wasn’t too disappointed personally but as a team, it was disappointing to lose.”

Asked about the criticism of South Africa’s style of play, Lawes replied: “They play to their strengths. What more can you ask for them? They are a big team, they want a slow game, they want to kick the ball and they want you to knock it on so they can scrum you and then they want to maul you and that’s the game plan. If you let them do it they are going to beat you and it’s up to you as a team to change that game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 2 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 8 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast Glimmers of positivity but Welsh rugby not moving anywhere fast
Search