Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Cipriani takes issue with England dropping Marcus Smith again

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Danny Cipriani has expressed disappointment that Marcus Smith lost the England No10 shirt to Owen Farrell when Steve Borthwick confirmed his latest team at 5pm on Thursday. The wounded English are travelling to Dublin ahead of Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations finale versus the title-chasing Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pre-departure media reports all indicated that Farrell, who was benched last week against France, would be restored as the starting out-half, with Smith left stewing on the bench for the third time in the tournament. So it proved.

Smith started alongside Farrell in the opening round versus Scotland when head coach Borthwick continued the Eddie Jones tactic of playing the pair as a 10/12 combination. However, that gambit was scrapped after the defeat and Farrell started as the No10 versus Italy and Wales with Smith on the bench.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Those roles were reversed against France, Smith named as the starting out-half and Farrell among the replacements, but Borthwick’s latest rejig will now see Farrell start in Dublin with Smith back to providing bench cover.

It’s a development that Cipriani alleged told him more about rookie head coach Borthwick, who has struggled to impress, than Smith, who had been Jones’ number one out-half in the last year of his tenure.

Related

Writing in his latest Sportsmail column, Cipriani began: “I’m disappointed. I had been hoping that England would stick with Marcus Smith at 10 against Ireland but it looks like he is going to be dropped again. If he is left out, I don’t think it will damage him because he is a tough character.

“It would tell me more about Steve Borthwick than about Marcus. It could show that he is uncertain about what he is doing as a coach, or that he has a lack of compassion for individuals. That’s just how I view it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The right call would have been to give Marcus another chance. Borthwick made the decision last week to go with him, so I really thought he should be backed and given the next four or five games, leading up to the World Cup.

“Instead, Owen Farrell is coming back at 10, but we all know exactly how it’s going to look if either Farrell or George Ford start. Borthwick knows that too. Both are both very good players but for me, the ceiling is slightly higher with Marcus, so as the coach I would want to see what that looks like.

“If Borthwick drops him again, that’s more big headlines. The coaches can have a chat with Marcus and say: ‘We’re looking to go in this other direction because we feel it will suit the tactics’ – but you know exactly what the fanfare and the spin on it is going to be. You have got to be super confident as a coach that the player you are speaking to and leaving out can handle all that.

“It might make Marcus go back and play even better at his club. Any time there was any adversity or controversy around me, I’d get the bit between my teeth. I think he’s got that grit about him too. He feels a responsibility to bring people into rugby and help grow the game. The fact that he even thinks like that shows his heart and the fight he has got in him.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Turlough 2 hours ago
'Let them keep talking' - Mike Catt claps back over Bok remarks

“You want that – not hatred – but whatever it is that stirs it all up. It’s good.” Agree with this. If you can put a common motivating idea in all your players heads during a game it can produce a real Team perfromance. Erasmus is pretty expert at this. It is quite clear that the comments by Etzebeth, Allende and others were not coincidence and were actioned to create animoisty before the series in order to galvanise the South African mind set. While I understand it, I don’t like it. They result in unnessary vitriol between supporters and for what? I don’t think any of the SA players seriously believe any of these claims and with Ireland ignoring them Erasmus won’t get the escalation he seeks. The vitriol shown by some SA and indeed NZ supporters is extremely weird for NH supporters (OK, maybe England have felt it) but it just feels very odd over a sport. Ireland were more or less sh1t for the first 100 years of their rugby, they have improved significantly in the last 25 to be in a position around now (it may not last) to go into a match with the big guns with a real shot of winning. The reaction to this from some SH supporters has been bizarre with conspiracy theories of ‘Arrogance’ fueling abuse from supporters and even NZ players to Irish crowds during the world cup. I love International rugby and the comraderie between supporters. I genuinely dread and dislike the atmosphere around games with the southern giants. They take this very personally. NH teams: play them, try and beat them, enjoy the craic with their players and supporters and wish them well. SH teams wish them well and they call you arrogant in the press months later. Its just a matter of try and beat them and then good riddance til the next time.

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jonny May shines as Barbarians beat Fiji at Twickenham Jonny May shines as Barbarians beat Fiji at Twickenham
Search