Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Think Rassie's 26 clips were excessive? Ref Owens once received 48

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

If you thought the fascinating 26-clip video review by Rassie Erasmus of the first Lions Test refereeing versus the Springboks was unprecedented, you had better think again as centurion Test-game referee Nigel Owens has recalled the time he was once sent 48 clips for review by an upset coach that he has refused to name in his latest weekly walesonline.co.uk column.

ADVERTISEMENT

South African director of rugby Erasmus caused palpitations on July 29 when a 62-minute video filmed two days earlier found its way into the public domain, casting a huge cloud over the Springboks versus Lions series and resulting in Erasmus and SA Rugby getting charged with misconduct by World Rugby. 

There is no date set yet for that disciplinary hearing but, in the meantime, veteran official Owens has revealed how he once had to defend himself against a losing coach who had complained about a way higher number of clips than Erasmus did. 

Video Spacer

Mzwandile Stick and Siya Kolisi tackle accusation of boring Springboks rugby

Video Spacer

Mzwandile Stick and Siya Kolisi tackle accusation of boring Springboks rugby

“I did one high-profile match when the coach whose team had just lost, who I’d rather not name, sent me 48 clips of incidents he felt I had got wrong, outlining what he thought were the reasons why,” revealed Owens in his always must-read column.  

“I discussed them together with my referee’s manager and coach. In private. At our review meeting. Then an email would be sent back to the said coach outlining our view of the timeline of decisions he had sent in. In actual fact, 35 of them were the correct decisions by myself – and quite clearly so at that, too.

“There were five or six marginal calls that could have gone either way, but which weren’t particularly wrong. If they were against you then they were wrong; if they were for you then they were fine. As is always the case, depending on the team you coach or support. The other seven clips he was right about; I got them wrong.

“Fortunately none of them were game-changing decisions, but nevertheless they were mistakes on my part and I acknowledged that. This is usually the margin of error a referee gets in a game, whether getting a decision wrong or not making one when he should have when it comes to what we call non-decisions, ie a player off his feet not being penalised, an offside missed, that sort of thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 5 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search