Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks dominate in 2024 despite ill-discipline

South Africa recieved 13 yellow cards in 2024. (Photo by Rodger Bosch / AFP) (Photo by RODGER BOSCH/AFP via Getty Images)

Getting on the right side of the referee has long been advocated as a quality all champion teams must possess but Opta data suggests the Springboks bucked the trend in 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

Second-guessing how the referee will interpret the laws, and managing him or her throughout the game, can mean the difference between winning and losing.

However, the Springboks debunked this notion as they marched to The Rugby Championship title and completed their first European tour clean sweep in 11 years despite conceding the most yellow cards of the year.

South Africa incurred 13 sin-binnings at an average of exactly one per game, which was only ‘beaten’ by Georgia (a 1.1 average), who incidentally also overcame the handicap of being numerically challenged in most games to maintain their vice-like grip on the Rugby Europe Championship trophy.

yellow cards, 2024

In only four of their 13 Tests (11 wins and two defeats) did South Africa keep all 15 players on the field of play for the full 80 minutes: the second Test v Ireland, which they lost by a point,  and in wins against Australia and Argentina in The Rugby Championship (rounds two and six) and the final Test of the year against Wales.

Having never previously received three yellow cards in a match in 133 years of playing Test rugby, South Africa suffered that fate in back-to-back games in July and August, against Portugal and Australia. However, Andre Esterhuizen’s yellow against Os Lobos, in the Springboks’ final Rugby Championship warm-up fixture, was ultimately upgraded to a red.

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, the finger of blame cannot be pointed to the big bruisers up front but rather to the back three contingent, who accounted for just over half of the tally of 13 yellow cards between them. Winger Kurt-Lee Arendse was the biggest culprit with three, while full-back options Willie le Roux and Aphelele Fassi accounted for two apiece.

Not that losing a man to the sin-bin was catastrophic for the Springboks, even with a new defensive system under Jerry Flannery. South Africa conceded an average of five points for every sin-bin period during The Rugby Championship, but in the Autumn Nations Series, the yellow cards to Makazole Mapimpi and Gerhard Steenekamp only cost them three points.

While they were not exactly whistled off the park, six teams conceded fewer penalties per match than the Springboks’ average of 10.1, with England leading the way on 9.25. Not that it did Steve Borthwick’s team much good.

South Africa’s biggest repeat offence was at the ruck, where their tally of 64 penalties was the second-highest of the year behind Scotland (69). One area where the Springboks reigned supreme, however, was at scrum time. The Springboks conceded a scrum penalty roughly every other game whereas the next-best team in that regard was New Zealand (1.07).

ADVERTISEMENT

As for the rest, if you combine the card count with penalties conceded, Fiji are the team with the most work to do going into 2025. Mick Byrne’s team conceded a 2024 high of 11.2 penalties per game, while also collecting nine yellow cards and two reds.

Fiji, red card, Waisea Nayacalevu
CARDIFF, WALES – NOVEMBER 10: Waisea Nayacalevu of Fiji reacts as Referee Luc Ramos shows a red card to Semi Radradra of Fiji (not pictured) following a Bunker Review (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images).

France and Japan had the best record in 2024 in terms of yellow cards, only losing a man to the sin-bin every three to four games (an average of 0.27). But their record was marred by two red cards and in the case of Les Bleus, disciplinary problems away from the field.

Eddie Jones’ decision to blood a load of uncapped front-row forwards will, hopefully, stand the Brave Blossoms in good stead for Men’s Rugby World Cup 2027, but it came at a cost in terms of scrum penalties conceded in 2024, with 26 given away in their 10 games. Argentina and Wales were the only other teams to average two scrum penalties or more per match in 2024.

Samoa and England, meanwhile, were the ‘cleanest’ teams when it came to overall discipline. England’s penalty average per match was among those lower than Samoa’s 10.33 (ranked first with 9.25) but they received four yellows and a red – Charlie Ewels v Japan, as opposed to Samoa’s three yellow cards and one red. Even so, discipline is one positive that Steve Borthwick’s team can take from an otherwise forgettable 2024.

Related

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

23 Comments
N
NE 19 days ago

Anybody still in doubt about WR's blatant protection and favoritism of SA now knows the truth. SA would be ranked 7th or 8th with neutral officiating.

Y
YeowNotEven 19 days ago

That’s what they said about the all blacks when they were at #1.

No matter who the top dog is, there will always be a theory about how they are treated special by referees.

A
Ace 19 days ago

Rugby is a wonderful game that is enjoyed by millions of people the world over.


It is such a pity that your twisted hatred of South Africa precludes you from sharing in our pleasure. You could have been one of our world-wide community of rugby lovers and afficionados. Instead you have turned yourself into an object of ridicule, laughed at and scorned by all of us.

J
JW 21 days ago

This data won't stop some posters

One area where the Springboks reigned supreme, however, was at scrum time. The Springboks conceded a scrum penalty roughly every other game whereas the next-best team in that regard was New Zealand (1.07).

Wow from one every second game to the next team one every game. That is some dominance at the scrum.

f
fl 22 days ago

What these stats actually seem to show is that there isn't a massive about of variation in the number of cards/penalties conceded by the top teams.


South Africa received 13 yellow cards in 13 matches; Ireland received 11 in 12; New Zealand received 11 in 14. The difference is pretty immaterial.


In terms of penalties, SA conceded 131 in 13 matches; England conceded 111 in 12. Considering England had the best record of anyone, SA are hardly far off the pace.

J
JW 21 days ago

Was the data available somehwere else?


What it shows is that refs have caught with what people had misconstrued as very disciplined teams.

J
Jon 22 days ago

Yes I was surprised at how close the pen count was - the spread between best and worst being just 2. The number of yellow cards though will surely be something the Boks will look to address

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

so what's the point?

A deep question!


First, the point would be you wouldn't have a share of those penalities if you didn't choose good scrummers right.


So having incentive to scrummaging well gives more space in the field through having less mobile players.


This balance is what we always strive to come back to being the focus of any law change right.


So to bring that back to some of the points in this article, if changing the current 'offense' structure of scrums, to say not penalizing a team that's doing their utmost to hold up the scrum (allowing play to continue even if they did finally succumb to collapsing or w/e for example), how are we going to stop that from creating a situation were a coach can prioritize the open play abilities of their tight five, sacrificing pure scrummaging, because they won't be overly punished by having a weak scrum?


But to get back on topic, yes, that balance is too skewed, the prevalence has been too much/frequent.


At the highest level, with the best referees and most capable props, it can play out appealingly well. As you go down the levels, the coaching of tactics seems to remain high, but the ability of the players to adapt and hold their scrum up against that guy boring, or the skill of the ref in determining what the cause was and which of those two to penalize, quickly degrades the quality of the contest and spectacle imo (thank good european rugby left that phase behind!)


Personally I have some very drastic changes in mind for the game that easily remedy this prpblem (as they do for all circumstances), but the scope of them is too great to bring into this context (some I have brought in were applicable), and without them I can only resolve to come up with lots of 'finicky' like those here. It is easy to understand why there is reluctance in their uptake.


I also think it is very folly of WR to try and create this 'perfect' picture of simple laws that can be used to cover all aspects of the game, like 'a game to be played on your feet' etc, and not accept it needs lots of little unique laws like these. I'd be really happy to create some arbitrary advantage for the scrum victors (similar angle to yours), like if you can make your scrum go forward, that resets the offside line from being the ball to the back foot etc, so as to create a way where your scrum wins a foot be "5 meters back" from the scrum becomes 7, or not being able to advance forward past the offisde line (attack gets a free run at you somehow, or devide the field into segments and require certain numbers to remain in the other sgements (like the 30m circle/fielders behind square requirements in cricket). If you're defending and you go forward then not just is your 9 still allowed to harras the opposition but the backline can move up from the 5m line to the scrum line or something.


Make it a real mini game, take your solutions and making them all circumstantial. Having differences between quick ball or ball held in longer, being able to go forward, or being pushed backwards, even to where the scrum stops and the ref puts his arm out in your favour. Think of like a quick tap scenario, but where theres no tap. If the defending team collapses the scrum in honest attempt (even allow the attacking side to collapse it after gong forward) the ball can be picked up (by say the eight) who can run forward without being allowed to be tackled until he's past the back of the scrum for example. It's like a little mini picture of where the defence is scrambling back onside after a quick tap was taken.


The purpose/intent (of any such gimmick) is that it's going to be so much harder to stop his momentum, and subsequent tempo, that it's a really good advantage for having such a powerful scrum. No change of play to a lineout or blowing of the whistle needed.

161 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
How law changes are speeding up the game - but the scrum lags behind

Very good, now we are getting somewhere (though you still didn't answer the question but as you're a South African I think we can all assume what the answer would be if you did lol)! Now let me ask you another question, and once you've answered that to yourself, you can ask yourself a followup question, to witch I'm intrigued to know the answer.


Well maybe more than a couple of questions, just to be clear. What exactly did this penalty stop you from doing the the first time that you want to try again? What was this offence that stopped you doing it? Then ask yourself how often would this occur in the game. Now, thinking about the regularity of it and compare it to how it was/would be used throughout the rest of the game (in cases other than the example you gave/didn't give for some unknown reason).


What sort of balance did you find?


Now, we don't want to complicate things further by bringing into the discussion points Bull raised like 'entirety' or 'replaced with a ruck', so instead I'll agree that if we use this article as a trigger to expanding our opinions/thoughts, why not allow a scrum to be reset if that is what they(you) want? Stopping the clock for it greatly removes the need to stop 5 minutes of scrum feeds happening. Fixing the law interpretations (not incorrectly rewarding the dominant team) and reducing the amount of offences that result in a penalty would greatly reduce the amount of repeat scrums in the first place. And now that refs a card happy, when a penalty offence is committed it's going to be far more likely it results in the loss of a player, then the loss of scrums completely and instead having a 15 on 13 advantage for the scrum dominant team to then run their opposition ragged. So why not take the scrum again (maybe you've already asked yourself that question by now)?


It will kind be like a Power Play in Hockey. Your outlook here is kind of going to depend on your understanding of what removing repeat scrums was put in place for, but I'm happy the need for it is gone in a new world order. As I've said on every discussion on this topic, scrums are great, it is just what they result in that hasn't been. Remove the real problem and scrum all you like. The All Blacks will love zapping that energy out of teams.

161 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'Owen Farrell has been bedevilled by injury. But you write him off at your peril. He is a contender.' Mick Cleary: 'Owen Farrell has been bedevilled by injury. But you write him off at your peril. He is a contender.'
Search