More than meets the eye: How Wales could triumph in defeat against England
Sport is about competition. Wins and losses – and preferably the former. Everybody loves a dub. Titles, trophies, and championships. Scalps, triumphs, and conquests. Nike tells us to ‘just do it’, but it’s much sweeter when you ‘just do it’ better than anybody else.
Points in the table, names on the pot, and medals in the sock drawer. That long bus journey home flies by when you’re sticky with champagne, and you drag your feet that bit less when Monday’s review is more ‘glowing’ than ‘Spanish Inquisition’. There are two types of people: those who like winning, and liars.
But, sometimes, there is nuance to be found between these two outcomes. Victory versus defeat is not always as dichotomised as the slotting or slaughtering of a touchline conversion (which, rumour has it, women have been known to manage). There are wins to be had even when you find yourself on the wrong end of a scoreline, and that’s worth pondering before the Red Rose storms Cardiff tomorrow afternoon.
They’ve played one another 21 times in the history of the Six Nations, and Wales have beaten England just twice: squeaking it 16–15 in 2009, and then bagelling the newly-crowned World Champions in Swansea six years later, 13–0. The rest have gone to the current title holders, and it’s even more lopsided outside of the tournament – where the world number ones have won all 18. 37 – 2, all told. Rose thorns tend to make light work of feathers.
Since England went professional, they’ve faced off four times, with an average scoreline of 62 – 8. Simon Middleton’s squad might not have returned from New Zealand with the gold, and they might be without some key personnel still – but they’ve plenty of the team who won 30 straight Tests, and will head to the Arms Park as heavy favourites.
In two rounds, they’ve scored 22 tries, haven’t lost a scrum, have conceded a teacher’s pet’s total of ten penalties, and are averaging four points per 22 entry – which is fiendish when you’re topping that metric by some margin, too.
The hosts will lob the kitchen sink at them. Of course they will. Alex Callender will single-handedly fetch every piece of porcelain in Cardiff, and hurl it – her scrunchie clinging on by the usual few strands – at the reigning champions. I don’t think it’ll be enough, but I think they’ll chalk up some significant victories along the way to their first defeat of a mightily impressive campaign.
There’s been a win already: the Arms Park is sold out. For the first time ever, every seat available to the public has been snapped up for a Wales women’s fixture. Those packed stands guarantee a triumph, before Hannah Jones has even led out this ever-more cohesive and threatening outfit. Magnificent.
Put simply, Wales would take huge heart from scoring more and shipping less than they have done in recent years against England. Since 2016, they’ve been nilled twice, and just once crossed the whitewash multiple times. Only France have put more than 15 points on England since Italy managed it in 2016. 2016! That’s before President Trump… before Hamilton had won a Tony… and whilst we were causing suburban pile-ups as we hurtled across roads to capture virtual Pokémon.
There is hope, though: the Welsh attack is transformed, and they’ve scored ten tries already, having only managed twelve in the whole of last year’s tournament. What a result it would be if they could surpass that by tea-time tomorrow – perhaps even notching a bonus point in the process…
Then there’s their defence. Wales held Scotland out for swathes of their clash in Edinburgh a fortnight ago, and have missed fewer tackles than anyone in the competition, whilst putting in the most dominant shots. England scored 58 at Kingsholm last year: tomorrow’s hosts will be determined to plug some of those holes – and they, frankly, should. They are good enough.
Wales are into their second year of professionalism now, and the improvements in their conditioning are clear to see – not least in the fact their front row played 79 minutes at the DAM Health Stadium. Teams often hustle England a bit before capitulating, but what if Wales never capitulated?
Even if they’re outplayed by the Roses, it’d be massive for a team with top tier WXV aspirations to keep any part of tomorrow’s 80 minutes from feeling processional. There was so much promise in the opening passages of their World Cup warm-up at Ashton Gate – the last time these sides met. Wales trailed 7 – 21 with half an hour gone, and their belief was palpable, but then Helena Rowland happened – and we witnessed a mauling to the tune of 52 unanswered points.
There are definitely further wins to be found in the tightening of their nuts and bolts. Wales are fourth in the standings for set piece, and for their ruck success. Can they maintain that – or even better those numbers – against the most ferocious pack in the competition? And what if they could rattle England’s fundamentals? Pilfer some ruck ball, disrupt the odd lineout, or force a spill or two.
Plenty’s been said about their vastly improved kicking game, and both Keira Bevan and El Snoswill have looked more comfortable and technically proficient than ever before orchestrating these last two matches. There’s an outright win to be had off the tee, too: they’re much more accurate than the Red Roses at present.
Frustratingly, Wales’ discipline remains terrible. For all the positives above, they’re averaging 15 penalties a match, and have conceded four yellow cards already. They cannot afford to lose players to the bin against a side so lethal they often make teams look a woman down when it’s 15 on 15, and – if you give England a free kick – they will thrash it into the corner, and they will punish you. If the Welsh can do better in that department – that’s a real stride forward.
Finally – Wales face France next, and that scheduling is perfect. If they produce the sort of performance tomorrow which forces Gaelle Mignot and David Ortiz to name their strongest 23 for round four’s grapple in Grenoble, then that’s a win. Ioan Cunningham’s side will head to the Alps as underdogs, but much less so than in recent campaigns: they could force France to really fight to defend their impressive home record, and a good innings this week would set that one up beautifully as a potential shoot-out for second spot.
There’s been a lot of talk this Six Nations about ‘closing the gap’ on England. They’re best in the world, seeking a 12th Grand Slam, and currently in cruise control: the gap has been a chasm for all but France for years. More than 40,000 ticket-holders and a trio of Sugababes will descend upon Twickenham in a fortnight’s time for what will be a Grand Slam decider, but there are some significant markers to be chalked in the Welsh ‘win’ column in the meantime.
They have the opportunity to make the Red Roses sit up and scrap for a result before Super Saturday’s finale, and to really take it to the game’s standard-setters. History might remember yet another England win, but Wales can triumph in plenty of ways in the process.
Comments on RugbyPass
An on field red (aka a full red) in SRP must surely carry a bigger suspension than a red card given by the bunker as that carries a 20 minute team punishment. Had Damon Murphy abdicated his responsibility as a ref and issued both Drua players a yellow, which would have been upgraded to a 20 minute red by the bunker, that would have killed Australia and New Zealand’s push for the 20 minute red to be trialled globally from July this year.
10 Go to commentsEver so often you all post a Danny Care story that isn’t the announcement that he has finally re-signed for one more, victory tour season at Quins and I’m just like, “well you fooled me again!” My absolute favorite player ever, we need to make his final year at the Stoop (and Twickers) official already. I know he supposedly snubbed France but I won’t feel better until he signs.
1 Go to commentslate hit what late hit it wasn’t at all late and can clearly see he was committed before the tackle
1 Go to commentsChristian Lio -Willies 2 try perfomance was a standout. As was captain Scott Barrett. Up front was where the boys won it.They are a great team and players. Fantastic Crusades , you can keep going.
1 Go to commentsI don't know how the locals feel about that? I guess if you call yourselves the Worcester Wasps that might be appease. But really we need more teams in the Premiership in my view so they are not padding it out as they are at the moment. It might curtail so many players going abroad as well
5 Go to commentsNZ 😭😭😭is certainly rivaling England for best whingers cup!😭😭😭 !!!
24 Go to commentsYup. New Zealand won 3 out of 10 world cups played. SA 4 out of 8 attempts 30 Vs 50 per cent.🤔🤔
24 Go to commentsShould've done this years ago. Change Saturday kick off times to around 11am. Up and off and back home before 3pm, limit travel time too. Allows players to actually do something else with their Saturday that's family oriented or being rugby fans they could ‘watch’ pro rugby. Increases crowds etc. How can anyone that enjoys grassroots and pro rugby have to choose between the two on Saturdays?
9 Go to commentsI bet he inspired those supporters just as much.
1 Go to commentsBen Smith Springboks living rent free in his head 😊😂
67 Go to commentsGood to hear he would like to play the game at the highest level, I hadn’t been to sure how much of a motivator that was before now. Sadly he’s probably chosen the rugby club to go to. Try not to worry about all the input about how you should play rugby Joey and just try to emulate what you do on the league field and have fun. You’ll limit your game too much (well not really because he’s a standard athlete like SBW and he’ll still have enough) if you’re trying to make sure you can recycle the ball back etc. On the other hard, you can totally just try and recycle by looking to offload any and everywhere if you’re going to ground 😋
1 Go to commentsThis just proves that theres always a stat and a metric to use to justify your abilities and your success. Ben did it last week by creating an imaginary competition and now you did the same to counter his argument and espouse a new yardstick for success. Why not just use the current one and lets say the Boks have won 4 world cups making them the most successful world cup team. Outside of the world cup the All Blacks are the most successful team winning countless rugby championships and dominating the rankings with high win percentages. Over the last 4 years statistically the Irish are the best having the highest win rate and also having positive records against every tier 1 side. The most successful Northern team in the game has been England with a world cup title and the most six nations titles in history. The AB’s are the most dominant team in history with the highest win rate and 3 world cups. Lets not try to reinvent the wheel. Just be honest about the actual stats and what each team has been good at doing and that will be enough to define their level of success.
24 Go to commentsHow is 7’s played there? I’m surprised 10 or 11 man rugby hasn’t taken off. 7 just doesn’t fit the 15s dynamics (rules n field etc) but these other versions do.
9 Go to commentsPick Swinton at your peril A liability just like JWH from the Roosters Skelton ??? went missing at RWC
14 Go to commentsLike tennis, who have a ranking system, and I believe rugby too, just measure over each period preceding a world cup event who was the longest number one and that would be it. In tennis the number one player frequently is not the grand slam winner. I love and adore the All Blacks since the days of Ian Kirkpatrick when I was a kid in SA. And still do because they are the masters of running rugby and are gentleman on and off the field - in general. And in my opinion they have been the majority of the time the best rugby team in the world.
24 Go to commentsHaving overseas possessions in 2024 is absurd. These Frenchies should have to give the New Caledonians their freedom.
21 Go to commentsBell injured his foot didn’t he? Bring Tupou in he’ll deliver when it counts. Agree mostly but I would switch in the Reds number 8 Harry Wilson for Swinton and move Rob Valentini to 6 instead. Wilson is a clever player who reads the play, you can’t outmuscle the AB’s and Springboks, if you have any chance it’s by playing clever. Same goes for Paisami, he’s a little guy who doesn’t really trouble the likes of De Allende and Jordie Barrett. I’d rather play Carter Gordon at 12 and put Michael Lynagh’s boy at 10. That way you get a BMT type goalkicker at 10 and a playmaker at 12. Anyways, just my two cents as a Bok supporter.
14 Go to commentsThanks Brett, love your articles which are alway pertinent. It’s a difficult topic trying to have a panel adjudicating consistently penalties for red card issues. Many of the mitigating reasons raised are judged subjectively, hence the different outcomes. How to take away subjective opinions?
10 Go to commentsYes Sir! Surprising, just like Fraser would also have escaped sanction if he was a few inches lower, even if it was by accident that he missed! Has there really been talk about those sanctions or is this just sensational journalism? I stopped reading, so might have missed any notations.
10 Go to commentsAI is only as good as the information put in, the nuances of the sport, what you see out the corner of the eye, how you sum up in a split second the situation, yes the AI is a tool but will not help win games, more likely contribute to a loss, Rugby Players are not robots, all AI can do if offer a solution not the solution. AI will effect many sports, help train better golfers etc.
45 Go to comments