Loosehead Prop Position Guide
Although the props rarely make the headlines, the game of rugby would not be able to function without these powerful workhorses.
Some people think they’re just battering rams, the role of the prop is more nuanced than it used to be. For this reason, legendary commentator Bill McLaren has referred to the props as being as “cunning as a bag o’ weasels”.
In this guide, we’ll take an in-depth look at the role a loosehead prop plays during a rugby union match.
We’ll cover the basics of the position, what a loosehead prop does, the physical attributes of a loosehead prop and some of the most famous players to ever play the position.
We’ll even conclude by providing you with some loosehead prop tips.
What is a loosehead prop?
The loosehead prop is a member of the team’s front row (alongside the hooker and the tighthead prop). They’re one of the three players in the front row of the scrum.
The loosehead prop lines up on the left of the scrum, next to the hooker. During the scrum, they push against the opposing tighthead prop and aim to overpower them.
The loosehead prop position gets its name because the player’s head is on the outside of the scrum when it engages. While the tighthead prop’s head is surrounded by the opposition, the head of the loosehead prop remains loose throughout the scrum.
Other names for a loosehead prop
Some rugby positions are known by different names in different parts of the world. For example, the number eight is known as the eighthman in South Africa, while the fly-half is known as the first five-eighth in New Zealand.
However, the loosehead prop is known by the same name around the world.
What number is a loosehead prop?
In a game of rugby union, starting players wear numbers 1-15.
The loosehead prop always wears number 1. Their tighthead counterpart wears 3, and the hooker that stands between them in the front row of the scrum wears number 2.
What is the average size of a loosehead prop?
Due to the physical nature of their role, loosehead props tend to be among the biggest and strongest players on the field.
Typically, most loosehead props are around 6ft tall (1.83m). Plus, the normal weight range for a top-level loosehead prop is 110-120kg (242-264lbs). In this respect, the loosehead prop is usually slightly lighter than their tighthead counterpart. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, Karl Tu’inukuafe, who plays at loosehead prop for the All Blacks, weighs a whopping 135kg (297lbs).
On top of their size and weight, loosehead props are expected to be incredibly strong. At the international level, it’s not uncommon for a loosehead prop to bench press around 200kg and squat 300kg.
Of course, you don’t need to possess this level of strength and size in order to play rugby for your local club. But, these statistics show you the physical power that loosehead props possess and the work they constantly put in at the gym.
What is the loosehead prop’s role?
The role of the loosehead prop is very tough and physical. However, they do not quite deal with the same load as the tighthead in the scrum. Due to this, they’re expected to do additional work around the field.
Although the role of the loosehead prop used to be almost entirely confined to set pieces, the modern loosehead prop is expected to carry the ball more and hit plenty of rucks. They’re also expected to show good mobility around the field. Now, loosehead props are more dynamic than they once were, and they’re expected to have good ball-handling skills.
That said, the priority for a loosehead prop is still to push and be solid in the scrum. With this in mind, let’s take a look at their role at set pieces in greater detail.
What is the loosehead prop’s role in scrums?
While the tighthead prop is the cornerstone of a scrum, the loosehead prop is tasked with trying to get under their opposite tighthead prop and drive them upwards. Meanwhile, the tighthead prop will try to pin down the loosehead using their greater weight (essentially, each scrum has two battles of supremacy between looseheads and tightheads).
At the scrum, the loosehead prop is expected to bind as tightly as possible with the hooker. This way, they are as close as possible to the ball when it’s put into the scrum. In addition, by binding tightly with the hooker, they can ensure that they do not become split from each other. Plus, the loosehead prop should also reach as far forward as is comfortable with their outside arm when the scrum engages.
Once the ball enters the scrum, the role of the loosehead prop is to push upwards slightly. This way, they allow the hooker to have an easier strike at the ball. The loosehead must ensure that the hooker is not under pressure and can channel the ball by staying square.
During the scrum, the loosehead prop aims to dominate the opposition’s tighthead prop. This way, their weight will be transferred backwards.
Added to this, the loosehead prop should be in constant communication with their teammates. By analysing the scrum, they can improve their tactics and execution.
What is the loosehead prop’s role in lineouts?
At the lineout, the loosehead prop will support jumpers and aim to protect the ball. As well as helping teammates jump, they will also stabilise them at the maximum height. Once the ball has been secured, they will make sure the jumper lands in a stable body position with their back to the opposition.
Due to the pivotal role they play at the lineout, a loosehead prop must know all of the team’s lineout moves well, including the ones they’re not involved in. After all, they may still be required to hold the line and provide a protective screen when the ball is not thrown to the back.
Notable loosehead props
In the RugbyPass Hall of Fame vote, fans told us they thought that Os du Randt was the greatest loosehead prop of all-time. A giant of South African rugby, he was affectionately known as ‘The Ox’ due to his size and stature. Partly due to his power and skill at the scrum, the Springboks won two editions of the Rugby World Cup (1995 and 2007) with him at loosehead prop.
Tony Woodcock is another notable loosehead prop. Between 2002 and 2015, he was capped a whopping 118 times by New Zealand. Once described as having the ‘best range of skills of any prop on the planet’, he’s one of only a handful of players that have won multiple Rugby World Cups.
In the northern hemisphere, Jason Leonard is arguably the greatest loosehead prop to ever play the game. Formerly England’s most-capped player, he won four Six Nations Grand Slam titles and one edition of the Rugby World Cup.
Today, some of the world’s best rugby players occupy the loosehead prop position. The best loosehead props on the planet include Mako Vunipola (England), Scott Sio (Australia) and Joe Moody (New Zealand).
FAQs
Here at RugbyPass, we’re asked a number of questions about the role that a loosehead prop plays during a game. To help you learn more, here we’ve answered a number of popular reader questions.
What is the difference between loosehead and tighthead prop?
There is a massive difference between the role of the loosehead and the tighthead prop.
In the scrum, the loosehead prop gets a lot of weight on their back and neck from the opposition’s tighthead. Remember, while loosehead props are trying to stay upright, tighthead props are trying to bear down and stay strong.
As the positions vary and different muscles and different parts of the body are required, very few people have successfully played in both positions at an elite level. However, one player who did play in both positions to a world-class level was Jason Leonard, who was capped more than 100 times by England.
What training do loosehead props do?
Although loosehead props are an integral part of the team, they do a lot of training away from the main group. This is because their role is very specialised and they need to spend a great deal of time working on their scrummaging ability. They will also hold separate meetings purely to discuss set pieces.
In the week leading up to a game, loosehead props will do a lot of live scrummaging work. Generally, they will go head-to-head with two different packs, so they can work on their endurance and stamina. They will also run through drills and continually work through physical set pieces. Work like this is physically intense and requires a great deal of commitment.
In the last couple of days before a game, loosehead props will generally scale down their workloads and focus on the more technical aspects of the job. This way, they’re fresh for kickoff. In the gym, they will focus on bench pulls, back work and neck work.
What loosehead prop tips do you have?
Loosehead prop is a highly specialised position and the ‘dark arts’ of rugby are encouraged in the scrum. For instance, it can be advantageous if the loosehead prop can get their head underneath the opposing tighthead’s, and onto the opponent’s chest.
Similarly, if you’re under pressure in the scrum, placing your left foot forward will put you in a more stable position. Although it will stop you pushing as effectively, this position helps you keep your weight forwards and enables you to use your left arm more effectively.
The best loosehead prop tips involve disrupting the opposing tighthead. So, bind later than the tighthead expects and continually change the height of the engagement. As well as giving you a physical advantage, this can provide you with a psychological edge.
Finally, here are some loosehead prop tips for while you’re in the scrum:
- Try to keep your opposite tighthead up, so your hooker can see what they’re doing
- Try to delay your binding for as long as possible, as this will prevent your opposite tighthead from pulling you down
- If the opposition’s tighthead can turn your left shoulder down, you are twisted and depowered. Try keep your elbow as high as possible
- Be aware of your opponent’s counter actions and remember your opposite number is trying to disrupt you
- Vary your binding actions when you enter the scrum – it’s far easier to scrummage against a prop that’s predictable
Comments on RugbyPass
Definitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.
3 Go to commentsSinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
1 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
11 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
11 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
11 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
11 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
2 Go to comments