Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ireland player ratings vs France | 2026 Guinness Men's Six Nations

By Ian Cameron at Stade de France, Paris
Sam Prendergast of Ireland looks dejected during the Guinness Six Nations 2026 match between France and Ireland at Stade de France on February 05, 2026 in Paris, France. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Ireland player ratings: Andy Farrell’s men flew to Paris with few giving them a chance of securing a rare Six Nations’ Test win on French soil and so it ultimately played out in what was a largely one-sided 36-14 beatdown in Saint-Denis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Worryingly for Ireland, the contest had an undeniable end-of-an-era vibe to it. Ireland weren’t so much dreadful as simply outclassed.

Here’s how we rated the Ireland players:

1. Jeremy Loughman – 6
To say Loughman was under the microscope at the Stade de France would be an understatement. That said, up against Dorian Aldegheri, the Munsterman held up relatively well, initially at least. Was used as a carrying option to little effect and lost the ball on one occasion.

VIDEO

2. Dan Sheehan – 5
Struggled to get into the game. Ireland’s lineout functioned reasonably well and Sheehan deserves credit for his role in that. Teams are seemingly getting a lot better at neutralising his running threat.

Match Summary

1
Penalty Goals
0
5
Tries
2
4
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
139
Carries
116
13
Line Breaks
5
22
Turnovers Lost
22
8
Turnovers Won
7

3. Thomas Clarkson – 5.5
Although a British & Irish Lions tourist, this was just Clarkson’s second Guinness Six Nations start. Under pressure but survived the early scrum exchanges with Jean-Baptiste Gros. Again, as with Loughman, far from a disaster, although he started to creak alarmingly before being taken off.

4. Joe McCarthy – 4.5
A deflated figure. Struggled to put a dent in the French pack in the opening forty, where it was largely one-way traffic. An awkward fumble or two, and had the general air of someone who didn’t look up to the task at hand.

5. Tadhg Beirne – 6
Spent his evening chasing Frenchmen around the Stade de France. A few game carries and marshalled the lineouts well.

ADVERTISEMENT

6. Cian Prendergast – 6
Thrown in the deep end at the Stade de France, Prendergast provided a solid option at the lineout. This was by far the most enormous challenge of his nine Test caps to date, but he can hold his head up high given the context.

7. Josh van der Flier – 6
Was on mop-up duty on Aisle 4 for the most part, one strong carry near the French line aside. Lead Ireland for tackles alongside Beirne.

8. Caelan Doris – 6
Tried to rally Ireland with a few semi-penetrative carries, but Ireland were unable to hold onto the ball long enough for any of them to tell.

9. Jamison Gibson-Park – 6
Scrapped for everything despite being perennially on the backfoot in this one. Was at six and sevens in defence, but he wasn’t the only one. Played the latter part of the match out of position.

ADVERTISEMENT

10. Sam Prendergast – 4.5
Kicked decently out of hand, even if he had a rash volley in the lead up to France’s first try. There was more madness to follow when he intercepted a pass, ran it over his own line before throwing a hospital pass to a bewildered Tommy O’Brien, before missing a tackle on Jalibert in the next French attack. Kicks straight into touches were to follow. Had his moments in attack but steers Ireland like a drunken F1 driver – plenty of skill but liable to appalling lapses in judgement. Improved as Ireland enjoyed a short-lived second-half purple patch.

11. Jacob Stockdale – 4
His first Six Nations game in four years, Stockdale failed to take a high ball with his first touch and it ended with France making 50 metres and very nearly scoring a try, but he refused to fold, and continued to throw himself into the air with abandon. Missed a cover tackle on Louis Bielle-Biarrey, which was a stretch to make. Tried to be useful, but it’s not immediately clear what exactly Stockdale brings to the table at this level anymore.

12. Stuart McCloskey – 6
A solid, meaty presence in the midfield if nothing else and enjoyed one excellent carry on 57 minutes. Plodding might be a tad unkind description for the Ulsterman but Ireland desperately need new blood in the midfield. McCloskey feels very much like a stopgap, even if this display had its moments.

13. Garry Ringrose – 5
Largely an onlooker in the first half, with Ireland’s backline at times resembling a panic-stricken engine room in a submarine that’s about to be torpedoed. Chased shadows all evening and looked off the pace.

14. Tommy O’Brien – 6
Proved a menace to the French cover on the right flank when he saw the ball and was probably Ireland’s only meaningful threat in an otherwise pedestrian backline. A load of turnovers blotted his copybook here though.

15. Jamie Osborne – 6.5
Opened his account with an excellent touchfinder to settle the nerves and did okay on what was a busy night at the office. Remains one of the few good news stories from this backline.

REPLACEMENTS

16. Ronan Kelleher – 6
Part of a replacement bench that refused to let the game slip into humiliation territory.

17. Michael Milne – 7.5
Very much part of the Ireland fightback and took his try well.

18. Finlay Bealham – 6
Scrums didn’t get any worse with Bealham on, which was its own mini victory here.

19. James Ryan – 6
An improvement on McCarthy, although that wasn’t saying a great deal on this occasion.

20. Jack Conan – 6
An uphill battle to turn things around but Conan did his job.

21. Nick Timoney – 7.5
Took his try well after cutting a decent inside line and generally looked useful. A man trying to prove a point and very much doing it.

22. Craig Casey – NA

23. Jack Crowley – 6
A few decent touches after coming on and playing out of his position.

Related

Six Nations picks

Plot your team's route to the Six Nations title with our Six Nations score predictor game! 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

15 Comments
S
SB 1 hr ago

4-8 were bullied by France.

B
Bob Salad II 1 hr ago

Scotland smelling blood.

J
JC 43 mins ago

That normally means a clot come game time and smelling salts after…

G
GRB13 1 hr ago

To think the so called “Pundits” said the 6 Nations was going to be a 3 horse race. Ireland definitely were dreadful and are on a downward trend now whether it is an end of era or not.

E
Ed the Duck 3 mins ago

Only MUPPET pundits were saying that…


@NB anything to say now???

S
SB 1 hr ago

Don’t be surprised to see them turn it up against England though. They’ll be hurting after that performance.

H
Hammer Head 1 hr ago

Not great from Ireland. Andy Farrell will be under pressure to show that he has a plan for Ireland. Because I don’t see it. Their game has barely changed in 3 seasons. Predictable. Predictable.


The only time they looked dangerous was when the French pack took their foot off the gas for a while in the second half. A weakness the French still need to work on. But with momentum on attack, the French were sublime.

E
Ed the Duck 9 mins ago

Their game changes with every match! They execute that little bit less effectively every time…


As for a plan, he hung his players out to dry publicly straight after the match so let’s see where it all goes from here? Still, there’s always a soft landing for him at sarries…

J
JC 1 hr ago

The problem is that he has changed the gameplan to a kick heavy, box kicking one that relies on a completely different personnel. We don’t have the wingers, pace or runners to play this way tactically.


The new rules on the escort and slap back means this isn’t one we should be playing and should have altered our possession based game with the strike moves that were working reasonably well. When we held onto it in the second half we looked better, but Farrell definitely needs to be held accountable for not blooding

players 18 months ago and heading on a sabbatical for a year. Losing Mike Catt was a huge blow as well, Andrew Goodman has made a career of falling upwards.


In saying that the French were magnificent and powerful in contact while their offloading was sublime.

G
GrahamVF 1 hr ago

Ireland pack was totally dominated in every phase except the lineouts. If Prendegast does not get a lot more protection from his pack he is in for a rough ride.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 41 minutes ago
Ian Foster is not the answer while NZR need to decide the fate of seven All Blacks

PMcD will digest these numbers. Interesting. As you say, at first blush they suggests a decline in relative performance on these measures. However, applying a median analysis to your yearly ave,* Razor was just below the median at 29 (vs 32) in attack and on it at 19 for defence. Perhaps however the most important statistic in terms of trend, is that the numbers show an ebb and flow for the 7 year period, marked by variance in performance in each two year period. Frankly these numbers if anything suggest absolute caution if trajectory is the main issue. Putting aside 2020 which is a bit of an outlier, and if we examine 21-22 we see the second largest 13 point decline in attack and a 4 point defensive decline mid cycle. Its why Foster fell out of favour. But what this suggests to me is that the ABs appear to making significant mid cycle changes which bear on year to year performance, ultimately building to a peak performance in a WC year. Importantly, in this regard, Razor did not “inherit” a team that played to his structures, unlike Hansen or Foster. And perhaps it might be said that his year to year performance was steady. A reason for concern, but I do not think a justification for being sacked on the numbers you have provided. Conversely, if trajectory over time is important, the win % against the other top 5 teams over the previous five years show steady improvement each year from 25% to 66%. Yes some “easy” games against the French in there, but that is the trend. Finally if these numbers include the WC games then I think we need to be careful given the number of games against third tier teams. Using the median helps with this but that distorts the picture in ny view. But thanks PMcD these numbers certainly shed light on the trend over time and confirm a relative under performance against some years.

* I don’t think we can safely use the total numbers as they will vary vastly according to the opposition. Averages and median especially smoothes this out.



...

110 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT