Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Setback for Ealing as Premiership ambitions dashed again

Recent Championship title winners Ealing in action (Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

Newcastle Falcons and Exeter’s place in the Gallagher Premiership looks to be assured despite their on-field struggles after runaway Championship leaders Ealing Trailfinders failed to meet Premiership Rugby’s minimum standards criteria.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ealing are currently 13 points clear of second-placed Bedford Blues and they look certain to win English rugby’s second tier for the third time in four years. This year that should have led to them playing off against the Premiership’s bottom team, which will either be Newcastle, who have insisted they will have the finances to compete, or the Chiefs. But that will not happen now, resulting in the same 10 teams competing in English rugby’s top flight next season.

A statement from the Men’s Professional Rugby Board (MPRB) said that Ealing and equally ambitious Coventry had failed the criteria, “principally as they were not able to evidence planning permission being in place”, to prove they could upgrade their respective grounds to 10,001 capacity within the set four-year timeframe. Ealing also failed to satisfy the authorities that they had the necessary safety assurances in place.

Doncaster Knights would be allowed to go up if they won the league and then a play-off, as they have met all the entry criteria requirements. However, the Knights are languishing in eighth place, some 29 points behind Ealing with 10 games of the league season to go, despite having brought in established players such as Semesa Rokoduguni and Telusa Veainu.

The MPRB statement is outlined in full below:

“The Men’s Professional Rugby Board (MPRB) has reviewed the independent audit of all clubs in the Premiership as well as those Championship clubs who applied to be assessed for promotion against the league’s current minimum standards criteria. The audit included three Championship clubs – Coventry Rugby, Doncaster Knights and Ealing Trailfinders.

All existing Premiership Rugby clubs met the leagues minimum standards criteria as did Championship club Doncaster Knights. Coventry Rugby and Ealing Trailfinders did not meet the requirements principally as they were not able to evidence planning permission being in place, and in the case of Ealing Trailfinders that appropriate assurances in respect of safety compliance were in place.

It is clear that the minimum standard required for stadium capacity has proved to be a major hurdle for clubs with the ambition to join the Premiership. In June 2024, Premiership Rugby and the RFU consulted with Championship clubs and agreed a phased runway to reach the required capacity of 10,001 such that the ground is then governed by relevant safety legislation. It was agreed that a promoted club could phase the development of the 10,001 capacity requirement of its home ground over four seasons – year 1, 5,000, years 2 and 3, 7,500, and Year 4, 10,001 subject to there being planning permission in place at the time of audit. It was hoped that this change in criteria would enable more clubs from the Championship to be able to meet the required stadium size and safety standards to be considered for promotion.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whilst we are disappointed that this did not have the effect all were expecting thus far, the MPRB is committed to supporting aspirational clubs and will work with the chair of the recently established Tier 2 Board, to support Championship clubs and develop a model where those aspiring clubs can have a clearer pathway to operating safely and sustainably within the Premiership.”

Mike McTighe, Men’s Professional Rugby Board Chair said: “We are in a new era for the men’s professional game and there are ongoing and very live conversations about how we can build an investable framework that ensures that it is sustainable. While right now only one Championship club is meeting the requirements that would enable them to come into the league, we are working hard to ensure that is not always the case and that we apply the right flexibility and support where it’s appropriate.

“We know how hard those clubs with aspirations to join the Premiership are working both to generate the required investment to be sustainable within that league and to ensure they have the required infrastructure to support themselves. This forms a vital part of the ongoing discussion and collaboration with a wide range of stakeholders, from the clubs and organisations who run both leagues, to many others, because we recognise that in the future, new and innovative approaches are going to be required.”

Related

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
J
JS 36 days ago

The Mens Professional Rugby Board are absolutely delighted to announce . . .

L
LE 36 days ago

Shame as Ealing look like they have a team to compete based on their prem cup run

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 1 hour ago
'Haves and have nots': The Six Nations numbers reveal hidden truths

Really interesting stats, especially around the scrums and the props spending so little time in them. The game is changing and is becoming faster but its also heavily territory and momentum dependent now. The amount of tries scored by forwards in the top 3 teams shows the importance of forward firepower at the lineout and is also of great importance when you are 5m out trying to get over the line from general play. Ireland don’t have behemoths but do well in this area due to superior technique and quality, France have the biggest most powerful pack and replace them with an arguably bigger pack with the 7-1 and England have plenty of power in this area. Teams are choosing to retain territory and use pens as a launchpad for dominating territory. Exits have also never been as important as they are today with teams giving away turnovers in their own half being heavily punished. The 50-22 is also important in this respect and we have seen how kickers go for it when on or inside their own 10. This especially happens directly after an aerial duel contest is won or in the event of a turnover in midfield. With the winger out of place and defence scrambling at the line a kicker is well within his rights to go for the 50-22. Giving away back to back penalties is also a no no as this leads to a 60-80m retreat. The Six Nations proves that in the modern age territorial supremacy and forward based power is what is winning games and championships.

10 Go to comments
S
SK 1 hour ago
South African rugby's top heavy house of cards

I think everyone knows that the SA teams are prioritising the URC which is why they have been so bad in Europe. The champions cup group stage fixtures couldnt come at a worse time for SA franchises. They come hot on the heels of the Autumn internationals and in December and Jan when its coldest in Europe and as hot as it gets in SA. During this period SA franchises have to leap from Africa to Europe one week after the next. SA franchises sometimes have to hop from Europe back to Africa and then back to Europe in 3 to 4 weeks. Mandatory Springbok rest periods are opted into by franchises to keep the players fit as the Springbok players cannot play year-round and injuries take their toll. Fatigue also sets in for players who have played non-stop since March as there is no global calendar. They don’t get a chance to regroup again until the six nations. SA teams prioritise what’s in front of them. The Springboks are top heavy and SA franchises are in Transition between the new and older generation. There are lots of youngsters coming through but they need more time at the top level. Coaching is also in transition in SA Rugby with many coaches at a young age. The age group levels SA has underperformed but the talent is there. Its coming through at franchise level and these players are getting great experience playing in a variety of comps. I would hardly call it a house of cards though. Succession planning has already become a reality. At Prop the Springboks are already replacing the seniors, at Scrum Half the Springboks are building depth and at 10 they have loads of options now and at 4 and 5 the Boks have used a host of players in recent years. Rassie has a plan for 2027 and the best coaching staff at international level. He has some difficult questions in front of him when it comes to the squad but is finding answers at the moment. Yes its possible Springbok performances could dip this year and perhaps in 2026 however I would not bet against them continuing to dominate while in transition. There were similar doubts cast about them last year and they proved the doubters wrong.

6 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Gloucester boss confident they don't owe Newcastle a dime Gloucester boss confident they don't owe Newcastle a dime
Search