Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

World Rugby consultant calls into question high tackle in Australia match

By Online Editors
The coin toss in Sapporo before the start of a match where Reece Hodge's 'tackle' was a major talking point

Respected sports scientist Ross Tucker has called into question the use of the high tackle sanction framework by referees at the World Cup. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Reacting to an incident in the Fiji-Australia match on Saturday in Sapporo, Tucker, who is a World Rugby consultant, wondered if the Wallabies’ Reece Hodge escaped a red card with his tackle on Fijian flanker Peceli Yato during a match that ended 39-21 in favour of Michael Cheika’s side. 

World Rugby’s referees boss Alain Rolland had warned before the tournament that red and yellow cards would be brandished without hesitation for high tackles at the World Cup, with player welfare foremost. However, those punishments have been slow in materialising.

Rolland had delivered his warning, telling teams that the number of sin bins and send-offs would be determined by players rather than officials.

England coach Eddie Jones has been outspoken on the topic, describing as “ridiculous” the red card shown to All Blacks lock Scott Barrett for a dangerous tackle on Wallabies skipper Michael Hooper last month in Perth.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

Australian Jones said the sending off “lacked common sense” and was inconsistent with how other similar incidents had been handled this year.

He said a lack of consistency threatened to ruin the global showpiece tournament. Here is what Tucker said after the Hodge incident on Saturday:

ADVERTISEMENT

https://twitter.com/Scienceofsport/status/1175287794643668992

https://twitter.com/Scienceofsport/status/1175287892207448065

https://twitter.com/Scienceofsport/status/1175288367052988416

Fiji head coach John McKee adopted a stoical view on an incident that is sure to result in a citing for Hodge. “I haven’t seen footage of the incident yet, but maybe some people will look at it. We haven’t spoken to the TMO yet,” McKee said.

“The referee has a tough job out there. There’s a lot going on. We maybe didn’t get the rub of the green, but we have no complaints about the referee.

WATCH: The RugbyPass Lego World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 4 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain? Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain?
Search