Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

England player ratings vs Japan | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

By Josh Raisey at Allianz Stadium, Twickenham
England's full-back George Furbank (2L) celebrates with England's wing Tommy Freeman (R) after they combine to score a try during the Autumn Nations Series International rugby union test match between England and Japan at the Allianz Stadium, Twickenham in south-west London, on November 24, 2024. (Photo by Adrian Dennis / AFP)

England player ratings: England snapped their five-match losing run against Japan on Sunday at Twickenham’s Allianz Stadium, beating Eddie Jones’ side 59-14 to register their first win of their Autumn Nations Series.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the midst of Storm Bert, which had a strong influence on the game, England were able to rely on their power up front.

It was not enough to salvage what has been a disappointing November for England, but it was nevertheless a much-needed win.

Video Spacer

Ben Earl on England’s string of close losses | RPTV

England’s number eight reflects on the 95 points conceded over the last three games. Visit RugbyPass TV for more of this type of content.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Ben Earl on England’s string of close losses | RPTV

England’s number eight reflects on the 95 points conceded over the last three games. Visit RugbyPass TV for more of this type of content.

Watch now

Plenty of players righted some wrongs after a frustrating month, as Steve Borthwick opted to make minimal changes.

Here’s how the England players rated:

Fixture
Internationals
England
59 - 14
Full-time
Japan
All Stats and Data

1. Ellis Genge – 7
Was literally running forwards in one scrum penalty he won, which gave England the platform to score their fourth try of the match. An impressive 13 tackles made despite playing just over 50 minutes.

2. Jamie George – 8
Considering he was throwing in a gale at times, England’s captain’s delivery at the lineout was exquisite with a 100 per cent record. Rewarded as a result with two tries, albeit he was helped by an 11-man maul for his first and a 10-man effort for his second. Led England’s tackle charts when he left the field after 48 minutes with six.

3. Will Stuart – 9
After going toe-to-toe with the South Africa scrum last week, the tighthead was able to really flex his muscles this week and had the Brave Blossoms’ scrum marching backwards. Even on one occasion slipped in the scrum but was able to get back to his feet and win a penalty. Marcus Smith would have been proud of the floated miss-pass he threw in Ollie Sleightholme’s first try – sensational. Looks to be adapting to the blitz defence adroitly, as he burst out the line to greet ball carriers with his 128kg frame a few times.

ADVERTISEMENT

4. Maro Itoje – 7
England’s top tackler and plagued Japan at the breakdown, winning a couple of turnovers. His rip in the second half helped England regain control of the match when it was getting sloppy.

5. George Martin – 7
Penalty conceded after early big hit, but that was a sign of his intent as he led the charge in England’s ferocious defensive effort. Drifted wide to leave the space for Japan to run into for their second try. But 14 tackles in 67 minutes was a good return.

6. Tom Curry – 6
Although he produced a commendable 14 tackles, the flanker was fairly quiet compared to his usual all-action performances.

7. Sam Underhill – 7
Two tries in two games for the openside, and not too dissimilar to his finish against South Africa the week before as he managed to dot the ball down while being held up. Unfortunately, that was his last intervention as he left the field injured.

ADVERTISEMENT

8. Ben Earl – 7
Pinged on one occasion for a low no-arms tackle, which is becoming a bit of a theme for the No 8. Scored the opener, and though it was a clear run to the line, the Saracen still had to show off his pace. The only England player to make double figures with his carries, and did the same with his tackles.

9. Jack van Poortvliet – 7
After a shaky start, which included being run over by Sanaila Waqa and caught at the breakdown, the Leicester Tigers No 9 grew into the game and proved to be a constant menace in and around the ruck. Though the scoreboard suggested this was a day for free-flowing rugby, it was van Poortvliet’s boot that put England in advantageous field positions with contestable kicks.

10. Marcus Smith – 8
Always tested Japan’s defence be it with his passing or carrying. This was not all swashbuckling rugby, but the Harlequin pulled the strings perfectly. His half-hour at full-back had a number of flashy runs in too. Not a perfect kicking display from the tee, but that was inevitable given the howling wind.

11. Ollie Sleightholme – 7.5
Perhaps slightly hesitant rushing out the line in Japan’s first try, although it still took some finishing. Made up for it minutes later with his own try, which was finished well with a deft grubber.

Related

12. Henry Slade – 7
Not a performance that was littered with standout moments, but Slade did the basics very well at inside centre, often stepping in at first-receiver. His handling ability and cultured left foot – particularly for George Furbank’s try – freed up Marcus Smith to play with much more freedom.

13. Ollie Lawrence – 8.5
Linked perfectly with Marcus Smith to power through flailing Japanese arms to put Ben Earl in for the opening try of the match. Displayed some brute strength to bounce Jone Naikabula, but also showed that he is not simply a battering ram when he danced past defenders and offloaded to put Stuart in for a break in Sleightholme’s try- a side of his game many know he has but has rarely been exhibited this month.

14. Tommy Freeman – 9
World-class leaping finish in the corner for England’s disallowed fourth try. Freeman’s kick chase was superb all evening, which was the backbone of England’s territorial dominance. More world-class action with his behind-the-back pass for Northampton Saints team-mate Furbank’s try. Showed his versatility by shifting to outside centre for the final quarter, which is another string to his Test bow heading into the Six Nations.

15. George Furbank – 8
Stepped in at first-receiver on plenty of occasions, which adds so much fluidity and width to England’s attack. With Slade playing a similar role, this was a glimpse of how many wish England would play. Defensively he was almost never put under any pressure, as the visitors failed to capitalise on the inclement weather to put his high-ball catching under pressure. On hand to score a try before leaving the field after 55 minutes.

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
0
9
Tries
2
7
Conversions
2
0
Drop Goals
0
90
Carries
105
6
Line Breaks
6
11
Turnovers Lost
14
3
Turnovers Won
2

Replacements
16. Luke Cowan-Dickie – 8
Got in on the try-scoring action just like his captain with two himself, although his required a little more strength than George’s two, as the Exeter Chief pinballed his way over shortly after coming on, then burrowed over a few minutes later.

17. Fin Baxter – 7.5
Some strong scrummaging and was busy in the loose, putting in a number of tackles to show-off his workrate.

18. Asher Opoku-Fordjour – 7
A nice game to make your debut with England’s scrum with the upper hand.

19. Nick Isiekwe – 6
Didn’t have long at the end.

20. Chandler Cunningham-South – 8.5
Metres after contact in almost every carry the flanker made after coming on after the opening quarter of the match. Doesn’t necessarily break tackles, but seldom goes backwards. The stats say he only produced one dominant hit, but the Japanese ball-carriers would likely disagree with that.

21. Harry Randall – 7
Was given over 30 minutes to show what he can do and help an England side that had lost their rhythm in the opening ten minutes of the second half and helped shift their attitude.

22. Fin Smith – 7
Playing his first game of England’s autumn, the Saints fly-half was given 30 minutes to impress his style on the England backline, and he did so. Tom Roebuck will be particularly grateful, Smith found his winger in space on a number of occasions be it with a fizzed pass or crossfield kick.

23. Tom Roebuck – 8
Deprived of his first Test by a tap-tackle not long after coming on, but made amends minutes later with a solo effort, showing a strong fend and swerve at pace.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
f
fl 206 days ago

great to see Fin Smith given a shot. Hoping against hope that he and Ford are trusted to run things in the 6N. We urgently need a fly-half who is capable of bringing his outside backs into the game.

T
Tom 206 days ago

I understand where you're coming from but I really don't think Marcus Smith is the main issue. Neither Farrell or Ford have managed to get the England backline looking dangerous for the last decade. It's a coaching problem, not a flyhalf problem. We haven't looked to have any consistent attacking strategy in the backs since Lancaster and Catt.


At the moment Marcus Smith is the only creative spark this team has going for it. There is 0 chance he's being dropped, save injury. If you want our backs to get into the game more it's Wigglesworth (and possibly Borthwick) who need to go, not Smith. If you drop Ford or Fin into this current system, you won't see them play how you're hoping they will play. The rest of the backline just isn't setup for it.

S
SJ 206 days ago

Not entirely sure I was watching the same game.

Overpraised - a result of seeing an actual victory, I guess.

Furbank defensively inept - once again he faces a 2 on 1, sits back waiting for the pass which doesn't come and the man carrying the ball does him on the inside. AGAIN!

O
Oh no, not him again? 206 days ago

I don't see the point of these rate the player articles. They gave Nick Isiekwe 6/10 because "he wasn't on for long"


What is the point? How subjective do you wanna be? I'm giving him one because INNEUENDO BINGO!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

I
IkeaBoy 49 minutes ago
How Leinster bullied the Bulls at Croke Park

Expert coaches exist across the land and the IRFU already funds plenty. Ulster own their academy and who owns Ulster?


If you go to school in the North and rugby/tag rugby isn’t even on the PE curriculum until 12/13 as opposed to 7 or 8 in Leinster, how is that the IRFU’s fault? Even then, it’s only certain schools in the North that will offer it. On what basis would they go up to the North (strictly speaking, another country in the eyes of some) and dictate their schools programme?


The ABs used to be light years ahead of the pack because their eventual test superstars had been playing structured, competitive rugby from an average age of 5/6! On top of kicking it around the yard from the age they could walk with their rugby mad parents and older siblings.


Have you somehow gotten the impression that the Leinster system is not working for Irish rugby? What is that based on? The SARU should just stop competing because despite their back to back RWC’s, all 4 of their URC teams aren’t contesting semi-finals every year?


A couple of mining towns basically provided a Welsh team in the 70’s that were unplayable. Queensland in the old Super 10 provided the spine of an Oz team that were the first to win multiple world cups and in the same decade. The ABs population density is well documented with 35% of the population living around one city.


Is England’s match day 23 equally represented by mid-counties players, tough as nails northerners, a couple from Cornwall, a pack of manc’s and a lone Geordie? Ever?

It’s cute they won’t relegate the Falcons but has a Geordie test player ever hit 50 caps?


It’s ok not to understand geography. It’s also ok not to understand sport. Not understanding the geography of sport is something different entirely.

265 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week Mick Cleary: Five things Andy Farrell must get right this week
Search