Northern | US

Doncaster Knights: Statement on Gallagher PREM promotion

Ben Murphy, left, and Telusa Veainu of Doncaster Knights during the Championship Rugby media day at Trailfinders Sports Club on September 24, 2025 in London, England. (Photo by Harry Murphy - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

Doncaster Knights have effectively taken themselves out of the promotion equation, admitting the financial leap required to reach the Gallagher PREM is currently beyond them.

ADVERTISEMENT

While confident of meeting the league’s minimum standards, the Championship club say the spending commitments demanded by the PRB’s finance audit make a 2026/27 application unviable, particularly as they move towards a hybrid squad model next season.

It leaves the Knights, who currently sit in 10th, watching from the sidelines should they top the Champ, though they remain open to future involvement, especially if external investment can underpin a Yorkshire-wide professional presence at the top table.

VIDEO

The full Doncaster Knight statement reads: “Due to the requirements of the audit to enter the Gallagher PREM, further to winning the Champ and the subsequent two-legged play-off against the club which finishes bottom of the PREM, Doncaster Knights (DRFC) will not now be proceeding with their application for season 2026/27.

“As in the previous three years, the Knights have passed the Minimum Standards Criteria (MSC), but the Finance Monitoring Requirements for promotion set by the Men’s Professional Rugby Board (PRB) requires a commitment to significant expenditure to enter the Gallagher PREM.

“With a new hybrid squad structure to operate in the Champ for next season, Doncaster Knights cannot commit to the required spending requirements at this juncture.

“Going forward, however, the Knights will be well positioned to take an interest in the expanded league at the top of the English professional game and will continue to positively engage with PREM Rugby, RFU and Champ Rugby to achieve the club’s ambitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A Yorkshire team making such a move could be achievable with significant third-party investment creating a structure to represent the whole of the biggest county in England, containing the most rugby clubs.

“‘Do it for Yorkshire’ would be a great aspiration and bring further life to the new development ideals of PREM rugby and RFU by making the professional game available to all areas of England. The Knights would be proud to carry that banner.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GodOfFriedChicken 1 hour ago
Jamie Joseph pinpoints where Highlanders repeatedly fell short in 2026

I’m not saying to have them rely exclusively on high school talent but teams should be able to retain their top local talent rather than lose them to more regularly successful unions on a regular basis. Look at what’s happened to the Manawatu region, who lost the entire Whitelock family and Codie Taylor to Canterbury before any of them could even play a game there. Imports are part of the game but if it’s a top talent that was either raised in your region or already plays in your region at a position that’s not of surplus, you should have more ability to have their rights. Also on the note of Tupou-Ta’eiloa, he moved to Moana because he wants to play for Tonga i.e. the actual purpose of the team.

The salary cap in SRP is very poorly enforced, especially when you compare it to leagues like the NRL or most of American sport. There’s no salary floor, so a team like the Highlanders is regularly spending much less than their other NZ teams and the whole AB top-up system means that you can essentially pay a bunch of good players much less for their SR salary than they’re worth because the players get enough of an AB top-up that their SR salary doesn’t matter. Given that the ABs have eligibility rules that require them to play SR anyway, it shouldn’t be a massive stretch to slightly increase the salary cap but include AB salaries in there. It’s not being “penalised for doing things right”, it’s keeping teams from hoarding talent and making sure the competition stays fair. Happens in the NRL every time but if their systems are as good as advertised (like Penrith, who’ve had to let go of a star every year to a lesser team since their title runs), then they should be able to rebuild. There’s a reason why the NRL’s had nearly every team (except the Warriors, Dolphins and Titans) win a premiership while SR has become top heavy with a lot of one sided results - one competition lets you hoard talent and essentially lets you pay them with hidden money legally, the other makes sure players are paid what they’re worth for the team.



...

8 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close