Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Analysis: How going 'all-in on Finn' saved the Calcutta Cup for Scotland

By Ben Smith
Scotland completed a 31-point comeback against England with Finn Russell driving the attack. (Photos/Gettys Images)

Scotland’s unthinkable 31-point comeback delivered shades of déjà vu, as flyhalf Finn Russell made plays eerily similar to last year’s clash at Murrayfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Russell’s man-of-the-match performance at Twickenham showed that the mercurial playmaker could do it again when afforded a starring role, even without stars Huw Jones and Stuart Hogg.

So, how did Scotland deliver such a sublime second-half showing?

Russell as Scotland’s centrepiece

In the loss against Ireland at home, Scotland struggled to score despite having many opportunities. The attack suffered from lateral play with too many ball runners and too few ball-players to set them free. They attacked with width and made good metres downfield but no one was able to ultimately break Ireland’s line.

One potential solution to this is to scheme ways to put their primary playmaker and chief creator, Finn Russell (10), into a position to provide for players in wider channels in the absence of a secondary ball-player.

Against Wales, they hit a one-phase strike from set-piece employing this strategy, moving their centerpiece Russell on a sweep line to give him the opportunity to ball-play wider out.

ADVERTISEMENT

The setup from the lineout maul is a traditional 10-12-13 formation with Russell at first receiver. Halfback Ali Price feeds Peter Horne (12) one wider instead, with Nick Grigg (13) running a tight option line and Russell sweeping out the back.

Russell is put in motion to receive the ball, in a position to attack Wales’ edge from around the midfield.

This is an example of ‘manufacturing’ a situation in which Russell can ball play on the edge and potentially isolate centres and wingers with his passing game. With his range on the long ball, any runner outside him is an option on the play but on this occasion, he feeds his inside runner and it leads to a try to Darcy Graham in the corner.

ADVERTISEMENT

Low and behold, Scotland has the same opportunity again in the exact same minute of the game against England, using similar principles in play design.

This time they use a miss-2 pass straight to centre Chris Harris (23) and run a hook-wrap with Russell coming around again on a sweep line with his blindside winger.

Russell senses that England have got narrow and he fires a long rainbow over the top to fullback Sean Maitland (15). This catches Jonny May (11) by surprise, who can’t recover in time after drifting inside his assignment.

There are very few players in the world that can throw this anticipatory pass and land the pill on the chest of the intended target. Russell is one of them. It happened last year at Murrayfield when he exposed Jonathan Joseph with a special pass for Huw Jones, and it happened again on this play.

It’s a magic ball that gets Maitland outside May and creates a two-on-one against Elliot Daly, resulting in a try for winger Darcy Graham.

A gunslinger like Russell can come up with either rocks or diamonds, but by backing his ability and going ‘all-in on Finn’ you can power a high-scoring attack.

Not many would have said Scotland would hang 38-unanswered points on England without Huw Jones or Stuart Hogg, but Russell’s performance shows that Scotland’s ceiling in attack is much higher than once thought and with the right play-calling and game planning, anything is possible.

You don’t have to flashback too far to find a blueprint for Russell’s own try – his intercept was the same scenario as his assist against Ireland in Round 2.

He robs Farrell in the same fashion as he did with Carbery, picking off the pass intended for the two-man pod.

This calculated play preys on the predictability of most teams who generally run the same pattern, one that Scotland use themselves and one Russell is familiar with. When a flyhalf becomes robotic and is ‘programmed’ to map phases, it offers the opportunity to disrupt by making a heads up read.

As Farrell progressed in this game his footwork became poor and he often shoveled the ball on the same spot, offering little running threat or disguise. Russell gambled on Farrell ‘running through the motions’ and came up with a huge play with the intercept, leveling the game at 31-all.

Against Ireland, Scotland failed to hit gaps where drifting defence offered ‘sliding windows’ into the backfield.

If Stuart Hogg looked to draw Bundee Aki (12) into contact on this example, with Jacob Stockdale (11) pushing out, Huw Jones (13) has a lane right to the try line. Instead, Hogg attempted to take Aki on the outside himself, running Jones out of room and is tackled.

Russell found this same opportunity against England to free Sam Johnson (12). Working the same way after a few phases, this time Scotland had the ball-player in position on the edge to take advantage with Russell out on the fringes.

Russell squares up Nathan Hughes (20) and uses a head fake to bait Tuilagi into the ‘overs’ option of Chris Harris (23)  and instead plays flat to Johnson (12) on the ‘unders’ line, opening the window for him to run through.

Russell sacrifices himself and takes huge contact from Hughes (20), but with Tuilagi turned out the lane is available for Johnson (12), who runs through untouched and goes on to score a spectacular try.

Russell’s fingerprints were also in the lead up to Darcy Graham’s first try, which was scored after the flyhalf created another line break taking on the line and playing Sam Johnson back on the inside.

Re-visiting my original review of Scotland’s attack after the Ireland game:

If Scotland are going to beat any of the remaining home nations England or Wales in the tournament or opponents like New Zealand, South Africa or Australia at the World Cup, it is going to be because their playmaker Russell has a hot hand.

They need to put Russell in the right positions to feed players in the absence of a secondary ball-player in wider channels.

They settled for a draw against England, but after a 31-point second-half explosion at Twickenham without Hogg or Jones, the case is for going ‘all-in on Finn’ is compelling.

Jones and Hogg are immediate starters when healthy, but Scotland’s attack can be modified to create as many touches for Russell, revolving more around his ball-playing ability, not the ball-running capability of say, Hogg or Jones. If Scotland’s star outside backs can learn to play off Russell when they return, their attack could reverse their Six Nations fortunes.

The losses against Scotland and Wales at home showed that they are not that far off, going down by less than 10 in both matches. The Twickenham test proved that Scotland’s attack can put up plenty of points – if the ball is in Russell’s hands.

Gregor Townsend on Scotland being underdogs:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 29 minutes ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 7 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Mick Cleary: 'There is no such thing as a run-of-the-mill, tepid, easy-as-it-goes East Midlands Derby' Mick Cleary: 'There is no such thing as a run-of-the-mill, tepid, easy-as-it-goes East Midlands Derby'
Search