Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The branding debate that has split Exeter Chiefs fans

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The petition for the Exeter Chiefs to drop their use of Indigenous Peoples’ imagery has sparked a hectic discussion amongst online fans, a conversation that many feel should have taken place a while ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

Momentum sprung from the Black Lives Matter movement which recently encouraged people to educate themselves on the significance of race, and it has now focused on the alleged offence Exeter cause by using Native American imagery for their logo and mascot. 

The demand for the Devon club to change grew when NFL outfit the Washington Redskins announced they will undergo a review of the team’s name. Baseball’s Cleveland Indians have also been targeted. 

Video Spacer

Exeter and England midfielder Henry Slade guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer

Exeter and England midfielder Henry Slade guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

A petition was launched last week for Exeter to do the same, which passed 2,000 signatures on Wednesday. The majority of voices on social media are in support of such change, but some have highlighted that Exeter were not intentionally being racist when they adopted this branding in 1999.

Instead, it is supposed to represent the bravery and strength of the people they are depicting in their images. 

The petition’s website addressed these issues and explained why this is offensive. It said: “Exeter Chiefs is a fantastic club that has seen a huge amount of success on the pitch and done a lot of good off it for decades. 

“It’s one of Exeter’s most well-known brands and has put the city firmly on the sporting map. The club MUST address its use of offensive and harmful imagery and branding.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There is no place in a predominantly white British environment for the appropriation of Indigenous Peoples’ imagery that has no relation whatsoever to the history of the club, or the city. 

“The Chiefs brand dates back to 1999, a decision that was not taken with racism in mind, but one that is now sat increasingly awkwardly at the pinnacle of English rugby.

“The stylised Chief on the club’s crest, the Big Chief mascot, the headdresses and tomahawks adorning the supporters, and the Tomahawk Chop chant are all examples of cultural appropriation of the Indigenous Peoples who were all but wiped out by white European settlers and who still suffer extreme examples of racial prejudice today across the world.”

Furthermore, it has frequently been said that the Chiefs do not actually need to change their name, rather align the branding with something more local, much in the same way the Glasgow Warriors have done by using a logo that portrays their ancient ‘West Coast Warriors’. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Pressure had been mounting on officials at Exeter to address this issue, and it was recently announced that they will conduct a review into the use of Native American branding. 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 1 hour ago
Pat Lam blasts 'archaic' process that lost the All Blacks Tony Brown

Now you are just being a woke, jealous fool. With the way things are run in NZ, no wonder he couldn't make a success there. Now that he is out shining any other New Zealanders, including their star players, now he is bitter and resentful and all sorts of hate speeches against him. That is what the fans like you do. Those in NZ who does have enough sense not to let pride cloud their vision, is all saying the same thing. NZ needs TB. Razor was made out to be a rugby coaching God by the fans, so much so that Foz was treated like the worst piece of shitte. Especially after the Twickenham disaster right before the WC. Ad then he nearly won the WC too with 14 players. As a Saffa the way he handled the media and the pressure leading up to the WC, was just extraordinary and I have gained a lot of respect for that man. Now your so called rugby coaching God managed to lose by an even bigger margin, IN NZ. All Razor does is overplay his players and he will never get the best out of those players, and let's face it, the current crop is good enough to be the best. However, they need an coach they can believe in completely. I don't think the players have bought into his coaching gig. TB was lucky to shake the dust of his boots when he left NZ, because only when he did that, did his career go from strength to strength. He got a WC medal to his name. Might get another if the Boks can keep up the good work. New exciting young talent is set to join soon after the WC as dangerous as SFM and Kolbe. Trust me, he doesn't want the AB's job. He is very happy in SA with the Boks. We score, you lose a great coach. We know quality when we see it, we don't chuck it in the bin like NZRU likes to do. Your coaching God is hanging on by a thread to keep his job🤣🤣🤣🤣

38 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT