Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The 'big difference' that denied Marcus Smith a fair England chance

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Former England player Austin Healey has claimed that Marcus Smith wasn’t given a fair chance to impress by new head coach Steve Borthwick during the recent Guinness Six Nations. The Harlequins out-half was chosen as his country’s No10 in the matches versus Scotland and France. However, he was given limited time as a sub in the other games, a few late minutes against Italy and just 30 seconds in Wales before being an unused replacement last weekend versus Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith was back in club action this Saturday, starting for Harlequins in their latest Gallagher Premiership match and going head-to-head against Saracens and Owen Farrell, his main rival for the England No10 jersey. Farrell was said to have marginally shaded that individual battle in a fixture that Saracens won 36-24 to clinch a home semi-final in May.

Prior to the start of the game at Tottenham Stadium in front of a bumper 55,109 attendance, TV pundit Healey shared his thoughts about the difficult situation Smith had endured with England, losing his place in recent months after being the No1 choice at No10 under previous head coach Eddie Jones.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Asked why Smith had struggled to impress with England in contrast to his greater consistency with Harlequins, Healey suggested: “The big difference is (Andre) Esterhuizen because when you are a player like Smith you like the outside. But if your centres also like the outside and Henry Slade likes the outside as does (Ollie) Lawrence, then they are quite happy to go with you.

“Esterhuizen will straighten up a defence and keep the tighter. The big difference is he never got to play with Esterhuizen for England for obvious reasons [he is a South African international] and he didn’t get to play with Manu Tuilagi, who is arguably the closest thing England have got to Esterhuizen. So when you have got a big, straight-running guy, he can close a defence off and keep them tight.

“When you haven’t got that then everything moves sideways and in international rugby, defences moving sideways control the whole pitch and that is the problem that he faced. You can argue, and a lot of English rugby supporters will argue, he didn’t really get a fair crack of the whip because he didn’t get to play with the same style of rugby that he plays with week in, week out at Harlequins.

“(Nick) David, beaten more defenders than anyone else in the competition, he has got him in the backline. He has got Danny Care, 10 try assists, better than any other nine in the country in terms of try assists and try creation. So, he has sort of been parachuted into a team that arguably doesn’t suit his style.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Quizzed if the Six Nations had definitely settled the Farrell versus Smith England No10 debate in favour of the Saracens player, Healey added: “No, I don’t think it was and it will go on through the camp in the summer to see where they get to.

“Watching Farrell in Ireland, he was right at the front of everything, and he stood up and he stands up to the biggest guys. There are not many fly-halves in world rugby that stand up to big backs, particularly the physical ones like the Irish have got.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Andy Christie: 'Diversity breeds strength in a group rather than weakness' Andy Christie: 'Diversity breeds strength in a group rather than weakness'
Search