Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'Political selection': Eddie Jones makes sensational Marcus Smith claim

By Kim Ekin
(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Former England head coach Eddie Jones has tabled a startling theory on why new coach Steve Borthwick flip-flopped between flyhalves Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell during the Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith opened the tournament in the 29-23 opening loss against Scotland but Borthwick quickly turned to the experience of Farrell for wins over Italy and Wales, relegating his younger 10 to the bench.

The Harlequins flyhalf barely featured in both wins coming onto the field with less than sixty seconds left in Cardiff with the 20-10 win already sealed.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the 24-year-old was then re-inserted into the starting XV after starring for his club in the bye week. But after a record loss to France, he was then dropped for the second time for the final round against Ireland.

Jones tabled his theory on his Eddie podcast that Borthwick may have received undue interference from the RFU board that forced him to recall Smith into the starting side.

“The selection of Marcus, to me that’s always the political selection,” the new Wallabies head coach explained.

“A player has been out of form, hasn’t quite done well at Test level and then he plays one or two club games and he’s a hero.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The media starts banging on the door – ‘you’ve got to pick him’ – and then the board reacts to that, and asks: ‘Why aren’t you picking him?’

“When you’re a young coach at the start of your career you can get influenced by that.”

The 63-year-old expressed his empathy for Smith who was one of England’s best in the 53-10 defeat but paid the price for the loss with his starting role.

Jones believed that the UK media’s influence is so strong that it creates disharmony within the RFU with executive and board leadership moving into operational matters.

“I really felt for Marcus in that game,” Jones said.

“The thing you’ve got in England is the intenseness of the media, which then affects the board, and they start to step in, and that’s when you get problems. Allow the coach to coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The board have a strategic role, but because they feel the pressure they try to get involved in the operational side, and that’s when things get worse.

“Unless you have strong people around the team that can be a difficulty.”

The RFU have denied Jones’ claims that Borthwick’s selections were taken out of his hands in a statement released to The Telegraph.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 4 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Lima Sopoaga: ‘We wish we left New Zealand sooner’ Lima Sopoaga: ‘We wish we left New Zealand sooner’
Search