Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Scratching our heads': NZ pundit urges All Blacks to follow South Africa's model

Damian De Allende of South Africa and Ethan Blackadder of New Zealand during the Castle Lager Rugby Championship match between South Africa and New Zealand at Emirates Airline Park on August 31, 2024 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Dirk Kotze/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

New Zealand commentator Scott Stevenson has backed calls for scraping the eligibility rules on All Blacks selection, stating that players must “get better” to win caps.

ADVERTISEMENT

The debate around eligibility has risen once more after Scott Robertson confirmed he would present to the NZR board asking them to have an open mind toward overseas selection.

The All Blacks will allow for a player to be selected from overseas on a contracted sabbatical, but won’t pick from non-NZR contracted players overseas.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Stevenson accepted that it would be unfair on players at home, but urged them to get better as the All Blacks are not a “participation award” for loyalty to New Zealand rugby.

“And the big argument is that it’s unfair on players who commit to New Zealand. And I accept that argument,” Stevenson said.

“I know that you want to have a strong game underneath the international level in New Zealand, you want players to commit to their Super Rugby clubs, but can I just say this, not every single New Zealand player is going to be in demand for a club overseas.

“No, they don’t have unlimited cash in France, England, Japan and they’ve got the international cap rules.  So I think that argument’s a bit of a straw man for me.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Stevenson echoed comments by Scott Robertson on South Africa and the Springboks, who used their open selection policy to use 51 players during this year’s international season.

The Kiwi media personality called the current eligibility rules “self sabotage”.

“The other point I would make about this is the one country that’s top of the pops in the world right now, two-time defending World Cup Champions is South Africa, and South Africa’s eligibility rules are very clear,” he said.

“You can go and play club rugby, franchise footy overseas, and you are still going to get picked. Rassie Erasmus started in tests this year 51 players, 51 players, we’re talking about the All Blacks lightly blooding 12 new caps this year.

“What I’m trying to say is that, you know, we’re sitting here scratching our heads, wondering how we catch up with South Africa while indulging ourselves in an act of self sabotage.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The reason the Springboks are strong is because they have opened up their eligibility pool. They’ve said, we want the best players in the world playing for the Springboks, then pick them from wherever they are.

“I don’t buy into this, ‘Oh, it’s unfair on other kids’, get better. The All Blacks are not a participation reward. It’s about being the best player in your position. That’s the way it should be.”

Scott Robertson expressed his desire to follow South Africa’s lead as he didn’t want the All Blacks to fall a “cycle of two” behind in the current international game.

“Using South Africa as an example, they get the opportunity to use a lot of experienced players … looked after and managed well into their 30s,” Robertson said.

“So they have got a great balance. They have got youth coming through, they have got good benches, they finish over top of teams and they have got big squads.

“They can have two really quality 15s, so what does it look like for us? How many players would we bring back? My next step is, is it case-by-case or how do we look at it? What is the potential opportunity moving forward.”

Go behind the scenes of both camps during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 2021. Binge watch exclusively on RugbyPass TV now 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
D
Diehardrugbyfan 11 days ago

Another way to look at it, is player development. I look at a guy like Cheslin Kolbe, he was good when he played for the Stormers back in the day, but he would not have became the lethal weapon he is today if it was not for the experience and exposures to different playing styles in France and Japan. I look at the Springbok players and feel that the overseas playing have made them better and enabled them to grow their skill levels to new heights that they might not have achieved if they stayed in SA and kept on doing the same thing with the same clubs.

j
johnz 12 days ago

It's difficult to say who we would actually benefit from having access to right now. Mo'unga and Fainga'anuku are the two that come to mind, but by all reports, it seems both will be back before too long.


I'm not sure South Africa are a great comparison; they are free from the burden of having to prop up Super Rugby, which seems to be working nicely for them. NZ don't have such luxury.


My worry, given Razor's obsession with experience, is we'd see the likes of Cane, Smith, Perenara, and Retallick back in black next year.


All great players, and what a luxury to call on them in a crisis. But their careers are in their twilights; it should be obvious we need investment in the future.


No doubt some loosening of restrictions will occur eventually. If NZR are strategic about it, it's not something to fear. Allowing a few ageing stars to collect their pay cheque overseas would certainly free up resources for the fringe all blacks and SR stars who are easy pickings for cashed-up clubs.


A good place to start would be our 10, 12, & 13 combo. Those 3 alone must command a disproportionate slice of the NZR wage pie. If they plied their trade in Japan, would anyone really miss them? It would be a great opportunity to deploy some resources on the next in line; we certainly need to.


And hey, if nobody else puts their hand up, we'd know where to find them.

T
Tk 12 days ago

Rugby is a professional game. NZR are (supposedly) a professional organisation and their purpose is to support NZ rugby. NZR employ rugby players to support NZ rugby. That means playing in NZ for our teams, of which the ABs is one. If an employee doesn't want to do the whole job, they won't be employed, just the same as in my job. Players who go overseas have decided to seek alternative employment for a different set of working conditions and as such do not play for ABs. Richie Mounga quit his job to work elsewhere, anything else is emotional baggage.

S
SK 12 days ago

NZ have a good system and are consistently at the top of the world game. In 2027 with the current system they will have a squad capable of winning the world cup. No need to change right now

E
Easy_Duzz-it 12 days ago

Capable of winning yes . But what’s the point of winning when you can dominate !!!

A
Andrew Nichols 13 days ago

...like there's anyone who would have made a difference...That's what these article fail to tell us. The real issue is the loss of the second tier who may in time step up. The incumbenta in the ABs have less and less pressure on them. Fergus Bourke, Aidan Morgan, Harry Plummer,....

I
Icefarrow 12 days ago

Aidan Morgan? Sorry, but what?

S
SC 13 days ago

Andrew I know you are a diehard Chiefs supporter but even you have to admit that Mo’ungs’s 2023 All Black performance was far superior to either Barrett and McKenzie in 2024.


In addition you have to admit that Razor and Mo’unga have had extraordinary success together. I’m willing to bet that Mo’unga’s performance in that black jersey would be better than 2023

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
The All Blacks don't need overseas-based players

I'm not sure you realise how extreme it is, previously over half of SR players ended up overseas. These days just over half finish their career at home (some of those might carry on in lower leagues around the world).


1. Look at a player like Mo'unga who took time to become comfortable at his max level, thrust a player like that in well above his level, something Farrell is possibly doing now with Pendergrast, and you fail to maximise your player base as a whole. I don't think you realise the balance in NZ, without controlling who can leave there is indeed right now an immediate risk from any further pressure on the balance. We are not as flush as a country like South Africa I can't imagine (look at senior mens numbers).


2. Your idea excludes foreign fans, not the current status, their global 1.8mil base (find a recent article about it) will dwindle. Our clubs don't compete against each other, it's a central model were all players have a flat max 200k contribution. NZR decides who is worth keeping for the ABs in a very delicate balance of who to let go and who not. Might explain why our Wellington game wasn't a sellout.


3. Players aren't going to play for their country for nothing while other players are getting a million dollars. How much does SARU pay or reimburse their players?


4. I don't believe that at all. Everything so far has pointed to becoming an AB as the 'profile' winner. Comms love telling their fans some 'lucky' 1 cap guy is an "All Black" and the audience goes woooh!

The reality is much more likely to be more underwhelming

But the repercussions are end game, so why is it worth the risk?

Hardly be poaching uni or school boys.

This comment is so out of touch with rugby in NZ.

European comps aren't exactly known for poaching unproven talent ie SR or up not down to NPC.

So, so out of touch. Never heard of Jamison Gibson-Park, or Bundee Aki, or Chandler Cunningham-South, what about Uino Atonio? Numerous kiwi kids, like Warner Dearns, are playing in Japan having left after some stardom in school rugby here. Over a third of the NRL (so basically a third of the URC) are Kiwis who likely been scouted playing rugby at school. France have recently started in that path with Patrick Tuifua, and you hear loosely about good kids taking up offers to go overseas for basic things like school/uni (avg age 20+), similar to what attracts island kids to NZ.


But that's getting off track, it's too far in the future for you to conceptualize in this discussion. Where here because you think you know what it's like to need to select overseas based players, because of similarities like NZ and SA both having systems that funnel players into as few teams as possible in order to make them close to international quality, while also having a semi pro domestic league that produces an abundance of that talent, all the while facing similar financial predicaments. I'm not using extremes like some do, to scare monger away from making any changes. I am highlighting where the advantages don't cross over to the NZ game like the do for South Africa.


So while you are right in a lot of respects, some things that the can be taken for granted, is that if not more players leave, higher calibre players definitely will, and that is going to weaken the domestic competitions global reach, which will make it much hard to keep up or overtake the rest of the world. To put it simply, the domestic game is the future. International rugby is maxed out already, and the game here somehow needs to double it's revenue.


This is what you need to align your pitch with. Not being able to select players from overseas, because there are only ever one or two of those players. Sometimes even no one who'd be playing overseas and good enough for the ABs. You might be envisioning the effects of extremes, because it's hard to know just how things change slightly, but you know it's not going to be good.

94 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ronan O’Gara would ‘bite hands off’ for Test rugby but rules out one nation Ronan O’Gara would ‘bite hands off’ for Test role with one exception
Search