Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Succession planning at 10 the downfall for the Blues

By Tom Vinicombe
The Blues succession planning has been part of their lack of success, particularly at the crucial first five-eighth position. (Photos/Gettys Images)

It’s a widely accepted rule that the best Super Rugby teams all need an immensely talented first five-eighth taking on the playmaking duties.

ADVERTISEMENT

Take a look back through history at the Super Rugby champions and you shouldn’t be surprised to see the sheer class of the men that ran out in the season finales – Carlos Spencer, Andrew Mehrtens and Stephen Larkham in the past and, more recently, the likes of Morne Steyn, Aaron Cruden and Beauden Barrett. It’s basically a hall of fame of Southern Hemisphere first five-eighths.

There is the odd exception to the rule but in 22 years of tournaments you can’t be too put off by seeing Derrick Hougaard and Bernard Foley’s names alongside the others – neither player falls into the same category as the likes of Larkham and Barrett, but they were still very rounded players that complemented their teams well. They were also helped by having exceptional playmakers around them in other positions, namely Fourie du Preez and Kurtley Beale.

Given this commonality between championship teams, it’s not difficult to see why the Blues have struggled to put together a successful campaign since Spencer left the team in 2005.

The Blues, with the largest catchment area for New Zealand teams, won the Super Rugby competition in 1996 and 1997 – the first two years of its conception. In 2003 they took out the trophy once more but since then they’ve had to settle for two lone semi-finals appearances in 2007 and 2011.

Over the latter half of the Blues’ existence, they’ve struggled to regularly field a first five capable of taking the team all in the way in Super Rugby. Luke McAlister was promising in the mid-2000s but always looked more assured in the midfield than as the sole playmaker. Nick Evans also returned to the Blues from the Highlanders in 2008 and helped guide the Blues to sixth place but he promptly departed New Zealand only a year later, inhibiting any chance of forming strong combinations in the team.

That’s not to suggest that the Blues haven’t been producing talent – nor have they necessarily failed to recruit players with great potential into the region. Ihaia West, Michael Hobbs, Stephen Brett, and Gareth Anscombe, among others, were all earmarked as players with immense potential who, for one reason or another, failed to kick on for the Auckland-based franchise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even now, the Blues are blessed with three of the most promising first fives in New Zealand in the forms of Otere Black, Stephen Perofeta and Harry Plummer – but this has always been the Blues biggest problem: they have number 10s with great potential but are never proven performers.

It’s not a secret that the best teams in any sports competition succeed so regularly over a long period of time because they have excellent succession planning. When one world class player leaves a team, there should always be a player ready to take the reins who has been groomed as the obvious successor. Unless a team has both an Obi-Wan and a Luke, it’s impossible to maintain any form of long-term success.

The Crusaders are the obvious benchmark for succession planning in Super Rugby. Carter spent more than a decade as the first choice flyhalf for the Crusaders and during that time a number of players were also given game time running the cutter. Colin Slade and Tom Taylor both spent a number of years learning from Carter and both progressed into the All Blacks due to this mentoring.

When Carter finally called it quits in 2015, so too did Slade and Taylor (a testament to Carter’s longevity and commitment to New Zealand), but Richie Mo’unga was ready to step into the playmaker role. Mo’unga, of course, wasn’t thrust into the team from nowhere, however. He had already spent time in the Crusaders wider training squad and so was already being mentored by three of the best number 10s in the country.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mo’uga isn’t likely to be leaving the Crusaders any time soon, but already the Canterbury team has started identifying the next future first five with both Mitch Hunt and Brett Cameron getting game time at 10.

Look at some of New Zealand’s other more recent successful first fives and you’ll find that they were mentored by successful older players during their formative years. Cruden, although lacking a great mentor when he debuted for the Hurricanes in 2011, was selected in the All Blacks squad in his first year of Super Rugby. His time with the New Zealand national team was no doubt instrumental in his progression as a first five because he was able to learn from some of the best modern 10s around – specifically, Carter and Slade.

It’s no surprise that, although he showed outstanding promise, it wasn’t until 2012 with the Chiefs that Cruden really looked like a world beater. At that point, he’d had a couple of years of professional rugby under his belt and played with some of the top first fives in the country.

Beauden Barrett too benefited from a similar kind of apprenticeship. When he first joined the Hurricanes in 2011, he was only offered a wider training squad berth – but he still managed to get some game time. More importantly, however, was that he was able to bide his time behind Cruden and work on some of the finer aspects of the first five game.

Barrett, who appealed more as a fullback than a first five, has improved his game at 10 to the point where he earned two World Rugby Player of the Year awards. Though there are still aspects of his game that could use some more finesse, his time working alongside Cruden at the Hurricanes and then in the All Blacks (also alongside Carter) did wonders for his playmaking skills.

Lima Sopoaga, New Zealand’s fourth-choice number 10 for 2015, also benefited from playing alongside a more experienced mentor. Sopoaga joined the Highlanders in 2011 as a back up to the also relocating Colin Slade (who was on a quest for more game time).

Sopoaga, at only 20 years old, was a newbie on the Super Rugby scene and, once again, had shown some promise with Wellington but still looked like he had a long way to go. Sopoaga was brought into the action a little earlier than expected due to a number of reasons (Slade’s infamous glass jaw being one of them) and his game developed immensely over a number of years, culminating in the Highlanders winning their first ever Super Rugby title in 2015.

First five-eighth is one of the most technically challenging and nuanced positions in any sport in the world, let alone rugby. Although from time to time a young player does enter the scene who flourishes from day one, most need a number of years to develop into an elite player. This development is amplified considerably when a more experienced mentor is on the scene to offer the wisdom they’ve picked up over their years in charge.

The Blues, for the sizeable population they have available to them, have continually failed to plan for the future. Young players with potential are regularly signed up then cast aside when, after a year or two, they fail to become world-class players (surprising no one). The Blues then revert back to the drawing board and bring in a new, young number 10 (if not two or three) then witness the same results.

Without an experienced mentor available to guide the younger players, however, this cycle is going to continue endlessly until the Blues get lucky and sign a player who defies the odds and achieves greatness on their own – something which has little chance of happening.

Adding more fuel to the flames is the fact that in recent years the Blues have struggled to produce any local talent in the key number 10 role. Plummer is the first player schooled in the Blues region for a number of seasons – you have to go back to 2016 when Matt McGahan and Dan Bowden represented the Blues and the year before when Simon Hickey was entrusted the coveted jersey to find local representatives.

Compare the local products with players sourced from outside the region and it gets a little bit alarming. Recent imports include Perofeta (Taranaki), Black (Manawatu), Ihaia West (Hawke’s Bay), Bryn Gatland (Waikato), Baden Kerr (Counties Manukau), Piers Francis (England and Counties Manukau), Stephen Brett (Canterbury), Michael Hobbs (Wellington) and Jimmy Gopperth (Wellington). Of those imported players, not one of them stayed in the region past the age of 26.

Over the years the Blues have tried to bring in an experienced 10 to handle the playmaking responsibilities or mentor the younger first fives in the team but most targets have wisely rebuked their offers. Perhaps the answer for the Blues is to simply hold on to their more experienced players for longer periods of time – even if they aren’t going to be world beaters in the future. At least then they will have wise heads on the roster who can guide the next ‘big thing’ coming through the ranks when they finally crack Super Rugby.

Whilst many of the Blues’ discarded first fives have yet to achieve anything to write home about, Anscombe is now the starting 10 for the Grand Slam-winning Wales team – he is now the exact kind of experienced player that the Blues have tried to bring to Auckland in the past. Maybe if Anscombe wasn’t so quickly cut from the roster at the end of 2012 it wouldn’t have been eight years since the Blues last made the Super Rugby finals.

Year after year, new first fives arrive at the Blues to much fan fair, and year after year these young players fail to match the hype that comes with them. This is rarely the fault of the players themselves – if they aren’t given a supportive environment populated with proven mentors then can anyone really expect them to develop their game on their own?

Failing to plan for the future is planning to fail – and the Blues have been planning to fail for a long time now.

Aaron Smith signs new deal with NZR:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 1 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

2 Go to comments
M
Mzilikazi 5 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

11 Go to comments
S
Sam T 11 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

9 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa 'It has left a sour taste': Lima Sopoaga hits out at changes in Samoa
Search