Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Forget talks of war, this seismic Calcutta Cup battle doesn't need hyping

By Jamie Lyall
Getty Images

Last Friday, Eddie Jones spoke about the visceral bludgeoning England would visit upon a callow France, the “absolute brutality” that would teach these lithe whippersnappers what Test rugby truly means.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Sunday, England did an awful lot of bludgeoning. They pounded away in Paris, gobbling up over 60% of the ball and 70% of the territory. They were desperately lacking invention, variety, leadership. They were blunt and predictable with the ball and bamboozled without it – a grim comedown from the summit of Japan.

In the aftermath, Jones spoke tersely and defiantly about how the horrors of the Stade would not change his selection for a monumental Calcutta Cup showdown.

“Why would a result like this change the 23 for the next game?” he said. “I really don’t understand the question.”

When he named his team for the trip to Edinburgh, he had gotten rid of his scrum-half, his loose-head prop, one of his locks and his blind-side flanker.

Video Spacer

It seems ludicrous to suggest that Jones, a fascinating and complex man, is under pressure a game after taking the side to a World Cup final, but such is the nature of coaching England, pressure is mounting. In the semi, England delivered one of the greatest international performances of the professional era – perhaps of any era – in dismembering the All Blacks. What happened to that team? Where was that ballast, intelligence and ruthlessness in Paris?

England have more players and more resources than anybody else in the game, but they are shorn of all kinds of heft. Their biggest ball-carrying beasts are felled by injury or out of the picture entirely. Billy Vunipola, Manu Tuilagi and Joe Cokanasiga are all crocked, Mako Vunipola is only just back, Ben Te’o is long gone and Nathan Hughes remains consigned to the wilderness.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead of Vunipola or Hughes, the outstanding Alex Dombrandt of Harlequins or Exeter’s brilliant Sam Simmonds, Jones seems adamant that Tom Curry can become a better number eight than all of them. Curry is a terrific all-round player and one of the finest flankers in the world. This is clearly a long-term project, but in the here and now, England are losing more than they gain.

Jones is sticking too with the ageing scrum-halves he took to Japan. Ben Youngs is badly short of form and Willi Heinz is going to have to exert a great deal more control and attacking verve than his rival managed in Paris.

England looked undercooked and underpowered. There was no great freshness to them, none of the spark provided by a young and hungry French team or a revamped Scotland in Dublin. Jones knows the extreme rigors and ultimate pain of Japan can linger – he embarked on a brutal crossfit programme to help rid himself of the anguish – and he kept training light in the lead-up to the opener. He doesn’t want his players, with so much rugby in their legs and so much strain on their minds, to run out of juice. But you can bet that it will have been hugely intensified this week for a fixture that now bubbles with ill-feeling.

ADVERTISEMENT

England Scotland

The vernacular around this Calcutta Cup is all a bit egregious. Talk of going to “war” on a rugby pitch, declarations of “hatred” for opponents do not sit well in a sport with a serious player welfare problem and deep-rooted values.

These remarks are ill-considered – you can be insightful, entertaining and determined in the press without resorting to such analogies – but hardly the great affront to rugby that some would have you believe. Lewis Ludlam is not seriously comparing a Test match at Murrayfield to a tour in Iraq. Sam Johnson does not really loathe Englishmen with every fibre of his being.

But what this manufactured outrage does is feed a simmering malcontent between the teams, stoked by the tunnel scrap of Ryan Wilson and Owen Farrell two years ago then the morons spitting bile at Jones the next day, and the ridiculous Twickenham draw last March. It was whipped up again by the memories of Scotland’s great 1990 Grand Slam triumph on the 30th anniversary and by the relentlessly mischievous coach.

“They’re a niggly side, aren’t they?” Jones said of Scotland this week.

The little Australian loves lobbing grenades in the media but sometimes, like in Paris, they blow up in his face. If the boss is talking about brutality and prodding the opposition then you can’t really slam a determined young bloke like Ludlam for dancing to the same tune.

Undoubtedly, though, away from the media jibes, Jones harbours great respect for Gregor Townsend and the work he is doing with Scotland’s small player base. In his recent book, he described the coach as a “seriously bright” individual who “scares me”.

“Scotland need to back him and I know that, if they do, he will deliver,” he added.

Townsend too is a man under pressure after the bleak Six Nations of 2019 and the hideous failure of Japan. But how quickly the narrative changes. Suddenly, after one bright near miss against Ireland, Scotland fans fearing yet more championship doom are now licking their lips at the prospect of vanquishing a vulnerable England.

Like their oldest of rivals, Scotland battered away at the Irish line for phase after punishing phase in Dublin. They had the ball and the opportunities to win there for the first time in a decade but not the guile to make it happen. They need to rediscover their ruthlessness, the try-scoring brilliance of Townsend’s early days that has deserted them this past year. They have managed a single try against Ireland in two games (and two in their past four), three in three against France, and one against Wales.

The power and dynamism of their work in the opener was deeply encouraging, a sign that at last they might be shedding the softness that often undid them against the biggest animals of the Test jungle. Still, though, they shipped 14 penalties. Still, they lacked the killer touch to get the job done. Still, they lost.

They are going to need all of that intensity and more on Saturday. Storm Ciara will descend; gale-force gusts and driving rain will envelop the Scottish capital. This will be a day for field position, set-piece ballast and an immense breakdown scrappage. Jamie Ritchie, Hamish Watson and Magnus Bradbury against Ludlam, Sam Underhill and Curry is an exhilarating prospect. So too Rory Sutherland packing down opposite Kyle Sinckler. Adam Hastings faces the sternest examination of his fledgling Test career against his old mentor at Bath, George Ford.

These are two wounded teams, a Scotland side heartened but exasperated, a chastened England searching for their mojo. Townsend can become the first Scotland coach to lead his men to three Calcutta Cups in a row – he needs results to underpin early promise. For Jones, back-to-back losses would be disastrous, but his conquerors of New Zealand have not diminished overnight. The upshot will be seismic – not war, but a tremendous sporting battle.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 9 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

39 Go to comments
A
Adrian 11 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

39 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING England No8 Sarah Beckett banned after leg-breaking croc roll tackle England No8 Sarah Beckett banned after leg-breaking croc roll tackle
Search