Ireland player ratings vs France | Six Nations 2022
Ireland player ratings: That was a Guinness Six Nations thriller where the result gloriously hung in the balance right until the final whistle in Paris, France eventually winning a rip-roaring, high-scoring classic 30-24 despite an inspired second-half Ireland comeback.
It was an energy-sapping, frantic affair in which French physicality was the overall dominant feature that tipped the balance the way of the hosts. Ireland, though, will take great solace with how they scrambled.
Down by twelve points at the break, the margin had spun out to 15 just minutes into the second half but it was incredibly soon cut to a single point on 50 minutes by a rapid-fire, two-try riposte which set up a thrilling closing half-hour before France were confirmed as winners of this particular Six Nations fixture for the third time in succession.
Andy Farrell’s side had come off their comprehensive opening round win last Saturday over Wales with high hopes of doubling down on that positive start by winning away to France, who were looking at Ireland as “the big cheese” in this year’s tournament.
Those odds on the Irish achieving victory were dramatically altered on Thursday when it emerged that talisman veteran Johnny Sexton had unexpectedly been ruled out with a training ground injury.
OH MY WORD! WHAT A CATCH FROM MACK HANSEN!#FRAvIRE #GuinnessSixNations pic.twitter.com/mRc6KOkDgZ
— Guinness Six Nations (@SixNationsRugby) February 12, 2022
It left them giving Joey Carbery his first-ever Six Nations start more than five years after he earned a debut Test cap in November 2016 and what unfolded in France was evidence that Ireland does have a capable rugby team without Sexton in the starting line-up. They will rue a slow start in which they went ten points down but will take great pride in how they responded so defiantly.
Ultimately, though, they will head into their round three home game against Italy later this month cursing handling errors coming down the finishing straight which left them beaten for the first time since France came to Dublin last February and won. Here are the Ireland player ratings:
15. Hugo Keenan – 6.5
For 17 caps, the full-back emblematic of the Farrell era was safe as houses but he came unstuck in appearance number 18. Started out defensively unsettled for that opening try and while there was one particular flash of brilliance under an aerial ball on halfway, it was his kick that went dead that gave the French the scrum that became the penalty for 7-19. Was far more reliable in the second half, an excellent break generating the optimism that a comeback was possible.
14. Andrew Conway – 5
A two-try scorer last weekend, he had an anonymous first half as play veered clear of his channel. Took 18 minutes to first show up, conceding a debatable penalty under dropping ball. Was much more involved in the second period but his display culminated in a poor call for Keenan to launch a kick with around 30 seconds remaining, cheaply giving away possession.
13. Garry Ringrose – 6.5
Showed last week how classy he can be when playing behind a dominant pack in round one, it was a different challenge here with his space being restricted when on the ball and his defence was questioned with a few missed tackles on his report card. Exhibited good hands, though, when the comeback was underway and had a willingness to try and go through a half-gap.
12. Bundee Aki – 6.5
Finished the opening half as his backline’s top tackler, an indication of the pressure that the high tempo French looked to build. Was miss and hit on the other side of the ball in that time, as illustrated by getting dragged into touch by winger Gabin Villiere and then alternatively illustrating his power with a crunching carry off scrum ball. Rose to the occasion with Ireland 15 points down but didn’t see out the contest as he was gone for Robbie Henshaw on 64 minutes.
11. Mack Hansen – 7
Voted the sponsor’s man of the match on his Test debut last weekend, he kept that excellent vibe going here with an incredible aerial catch of Carbery’s restart to race away from the 22 and score on seven minutes without breaking his stride. Demonstrated good game awareness with the French pressure and was his team’s main target under the aerial ball.
10. Joey Carbery – 8
Had little time to orchestrate when on the ball in general play in the first half but his kicking prowess was evident in the restart that led to Hansen’s try and the ensuing touchline conversion he landed with aplomb. Tackled diligently – look at his 34th minute on Gael Fickou – and he upped the ante when his team needed it most in a second-half where his soft hands were a frequent feature. A few more starting opportunities in the big games like this will bring him on a ton. He must be in the conversion to start at Twickenham in round four – even if Sexton is fit and available.
Ireland have found their power tools ? #FRAvIRE #GuinnessSixNations pic.twitter.com/6AVSwV9jvP
— Guinness Six Nations (@SixNationsRugby) February 12, 2022
9. Jamison Gibson-Park – 7.5
The Kiwi has been one of the key players in the recent transformation of the Ireland attack but his lack of composure in the first half was typical of the hurried nature of Ireland’s unsettling play when confronted by non-stop French physicality at the breakdown. Doggedly hung tough, though. Grabbed an excellently taken try on 50 minutes with a neat break but left the fray on 64 minutes for Conor Murray to finish.
1. Andrew Porter – 8
Was a force against Wales but that was was a totally different level compared to the physicality here. Gave up the penalty in the first French scrum after 22 minutes, but he was another player who came through the adversity with much credit in the bank. It was his foraging at the breakdown after a French carry that won Ireland the possession that led to Josh van der Flier’s comeback-igniting try. Played a whopping 73 minutes.
2. Ronan Kelleher – 5.5
Lasted just 26 minutes following an up and down effort. For instance, he put a fine tackle in on Julian Marchand shortly after conceding a penalty and then snaffled a loose French throw quickly after a handling error when trying to take a pass. Damaged his shoulder and couldn’t play on after some initial on-field treatment.
3. Tadhg Furlong – 8
Stood up when Ireland were all at sea but it wasn’t a totally faultless resistance. Was done for offside to see France move 16-7 after the defence was panicked by some scramble Damian Penaud genius, and the scrum also went backwards before the break. Was a more powerful operator in the second half and there was also a trademark show of sweet hands on one occasion to send Keenan away. Another prop to play an exhausting 73 minutes.
4. Tadhg Beirne – 8
Another gritty effort by a tremendous footballer whose influence at Test level continues to grow. It was his determination that helped to ensure the French didn’t run away with this and his ability to have a positive role was capped by his fabulous 50:22 kick on 67 minutes that got Ireland into a threatening position that they couldn’t profit from.
5. James Ryan – 7.5
Endured a troubled start where he stepped in too close to Keenan to allow Antoine Dupont the space to glide in. Responded to French nuisance by turning the tide in the second half but it was cruelly his boot that unwittingly deflected the ball clear for the Cyril Baille try and his leadership will be a focus in the post-mortem for the 73rd-minute penalty decision to take points rather than go to the corner.
6. Caelan Doris – 7.5
Two turnovers conceded in the opening period were uncharacteristic of the blindside but he made amends in the sense that he was Ireland’s top first half tackler. Rose to great prominence in the second half where he showed the ability that came to the fore during the November series. It was unfortunately his penalty at the breakdown that then gave the French their final three points.
7. Josh Van Der Flier – 7
Another of the forwards who were swamped by the early French physicality but he is a resilient operator who has learned the hard way how to duck and dive at this level. His ability to wield positive influence was epitomised by his 45th-minute try.
8. Jack Conan – 5.5
Endured a sketchy start with the French laying down a marker. Was at fault for the holding-on penalty that put the hosts 13-7 up and he continued to struggle with the intensity, making little headway. It just wasn’t his night and he exited for Peter O’Mahony on 53 minutes.
REPLACEMENTS
16. Dan Sheehan – 7.5
Sent into battle on 26 minutes with Kelleher injured, the Test rookie soon saw a lineout throw not going to plan but he was another player who got to demonstrate his true worth with some second-half excellence. Was energetic in the move that led to Gibson-Park’s try and his wrap in the tackle to deny Melvyn Jaminet from grounding for a 77th-minute try was sensational.
17. Cian Healy – No Rating
A 73rd-minute sub for Porter.
18. Finlay Bealham – NR
Another 73rd-minute sub, this time for Furlong.
19. Iain Henderson – 5.5
Had a minute for Ryan at the end of the first half before returning on 58 minutes when fellow sub Peter O’Mahony exited for a HIA. Annoyingly couldn’t take the catch at a crucial 67th-minute lineout and his hands were again disappointing after transferring loose ball from a kick rebound. Did rip ball from France in the final moments but it didn’t lead to anything.
20. Peter O’Mahony – NR
Came on for Conan just before the French try on 53 minutes but was gone five minutes later for a concussion test.
21. Conor Murray – 5.5
Arrived on after 64 minutes for Gibson-Park with the score poised at 21-27 but couldn’t provide an edge to successfully complete his team’s comeback.
22. Jack Carty – NR
Only sent on with a minute remaining.
23. Robbie Henshaw – 6
The other replacement Ireland made on 64 minutes, he picked up the baton from Aki and his slickest moment was his alertness when covering a Penaud kick through.
Comments on RugbyPass
Sinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
1 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
11 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
11 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
11 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
11 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
2 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to comments