Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Government warn Premiership clubs are 'teetering on the edge'

By PA
A Gallagher Premiership flag during the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Bath Rugby and Sale Sharks at the Recreation Ground on October 26, 2024 in Bath, England. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The Government has been warned to keep a close eye on Gallagher Premiership clubs “teetering on the edge” after a new report set out the cost to taxpayers of three top-flight clubs going under.

ADVERTISEMENT

In total, Premiership clubs received £123.8million in loans from the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) designed to help the sports and culture sectors manage the financial shock of the Covid-19 pandemic.

A new report from the National Audit Office (NAO) said that £41.6m of that went to London Irish, Worcester and Wasps, out of £46.1m that was handed to entities that are now insolvent.

The NAO report says DCMS does not expect to recover up to £29m of that figure, and a further £11m in interest payments that will not now be made.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, the chair of the Public Accounts Committee, said in response to the report: “Although progress has been made in recovering initial repayments, it is concerning that up to £29million of taxpayer money could be lost from borrowers who have since gone under.

Fixture
Gallagher Premiership
Gloucester
14 - 0
Full-time
Harlequins
All Stats and Data

“DCMS should continue to keep a close eye on English rugby union clubs that have been teetering on the edge.

“Given the public money at stake, the department has more to do to show it has a long-term plan for managing and recovering loans across the sectors.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The NAO report states DCMS has recovered £9.8m from the administrators of Worcester, plus £300,000 from the administrators of Wasps. DCMS expects to recover between a further £7.3m and £11.1m from all the loan book insolvencies.

The money loaned to Premiership clubs amounted to 26 per cent of the overall total.

In June last year DCMS appointed two independent advisors to help the Rugby Football Union and Premiership Rugby stabilise the future of the sport.

The report added: “Acknowledging its ongoing role as a key stakeholder, DCMS is closely monitoring the remaining Premiership clubs to identify any which may be behind on their repayments and facing financial difficulties. In doing so DCMS is monitoring the risk it faces to protect its investment on behalf of taxpayers.”

All solvent borrowers should make a first repayment no later than September next year. The report found 45 per cent of solvent borrowers had made at least one repayment by October this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

DCMS has recovered 97 per cent of scheduled repayments to date, the report said.

The three Premiership teams were among nine borrowers who had fallen into insolvency by October this year, 7.5 per cent of the total number of borrowers.

DCMS’ own projections expected five per cent of borrowers to fail in the first three years of the loans, rising to 14 per cent after 10 years.

Gareth Davies, the head of the NAO, said: “Government issued loans to the culture and sports sectors in extremely demanding circumstances, helping many organisations survive the immediate threat of the pandemic.

“It has since made progress in achieving 97 per cent of the repayments scheduled to date.

“However, with all borrowers scheduled to start repaying next year, and ongoing risks to future recoveries, government should strengthen its longer-term plan for protecting taxpayers’ exposure.”

Premiership Rugby has been contacted for comment.

Related

Top 100

Rugby’s best of the best, ranked by experts. Check out our list of the Top 100 Men's Rugby Players and let us know what you think! 



ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
P
Poorfour 34 days ago

This is not a very clear article - it seems to flip between the three failed clubs, the surviving clubs and the wider loans to sport and culture but sometimes using the same numbers against different groups.


It sounds as if the surviving clubs are actually on schedule with their repayments (or is that the wider sports sector), but that DCMS needs more support and focus to manage the wider portfolio of loans, and will lose a lot of the money it loaned to the clubs that went under - who made up 1/3 of the loans, despite being only 1/4 of the clubs.


The only really bleak thing is how many clubs failed - but that's not new news.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 1 hour ago
Is the overlap dying in modern rugby?

A very interesting article, Nick. On beautiful and unseasonly cool summer morning here in our part of Qld., as the sun rises over the distant Border Ranges beyond the misty Lockyer Valley, that winter of '63 in the British Isles is now a distant but clear memory. There was a very heavy snowfall in Ulster, I was at school in Belfast. The snow was so heavy by mid morning that the headmaster closed down, sent us all home. Fine for those 99% of the kids who lived within a few miles of the school in E. Belfast. But my brother and I lived up on the Antrim Plateau, a good hour away. It was an interesting journey home, including a three mile hike along narrow country lanes !


It will be interesting to see how Ireland go this year in the 6N. The Nienaber defence revolution at Leinster is bound to be to the fore, with the dominance of that province in the make up of the team. However I would hope the legacy of the Lancaster era is still strong too. I'm not feeling too confident atm, with the AB game and the 2024 England 6N defeat too fresh in the memory.


Great clips from the JPR era. I see John Dawes involved there, and he was so often crucial with his ability to pass accurately under pressure. That is what is missing in the LAR game clips. A John Dawes type ability to pass well under pressure. I feel the teams that cause the rush defence problems will always be those that use out the back accurate passes to create space for the wide player, be he a Cheslin Kolbe or a big fast modern age forward,

24 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson has to take charge of his All Blacks in 2025

Haha crap man I wouldn't know if SR has ever made a profit. ABs subsidize everything. Factors like SR clubs not paying 'for' their ABs etc, normal having a star would cost you 2 or 3x as much as a regular, but NZR covers all that in NZ. Pretty sure was the case for the other two partners too. I doubt even NZR knows the exact ratios sponsors like Sky/Adidas/AIG/Altrad/Investec give for local product.


No doubt SR used to make more money with the 3 partners, but of course it was also split 3 way. TBH I don't think its going to be much different (I think the new deal is still higher than before?). That last deal was bumper despite the comp being in decline, then SA left and the deal was probably worth even more for NZ? Can't recall how that played out I think Sky kept the agreemnt (fully). They'll be taking a big hit but it would be anything to do with the state of the game.


So when you say bleeding, you mean since around 2013/14 right? When SA'n and Aussie crowds finally stopped turning up to watch NZ smash them every week. So again, I was just stating your picture was wrong, and you've got the wrong causes, I don't disagree too much with the idea it's 'bleeding' though, id1ots were complaining about NZ sides getting a rough deal come final time for a loooong period and lots of other things that dragged the game down but on the field it just kept getting better and better. The problem is this nationalistic concept, that caught up on them (previously being the great driver for interest) and fans didn't care about the top four teams like every other sports competition in the world. They only cared about their local teams not winning.


No, SR wasnt optimal, which is what it was recommended to have just the SR Pacific comp instead. I'm not sure how much better things are now though. It needs time?


I know how I'd like to find equilibrium and it's much like what you propose. One big difference is I just don't think they need to cut SR. I would switch investment into an NPC/fully domestic scene + youth, like you, I'd just have like a much shorter SR season and I'd try and create a university scene rather than high school, that little extra age demographic matters a lot to investment/interest.


It's what the NRL can pay, and I think I heard it recently for someone in the spot light. I used it as a future figure more than anything though, the idea being these other leagues are only going to be more and more competitive, so much so they take away local talent before it can have a chance to develop. And once it goes they're unlikely to develop into the player they would have here. Not choosing a path that can compete will be a disaster imo. Thus the All Black decline.


I think don't think theres any reason your ideas can't work though, with maybe a added little flair here and there to drive some extra revenue. 20 is just a number to get a picture how many of top 60 might dissapear, it's nothing Id calculated. Think of it as an 'at any particular time' number.


In general I think people so quickly forget those that leave and all hope is placed on the next guy. Think that were talking top 4 or 5 in a position, there are a lot of positions that don't place much past the number 3. Look at Bell, theres no one he would be one of NZ top dozen hookers, numerous people would have left without getting a shot and the likes of Riccitelli or Eklund are obvious better. You've got first fives like Burke, Jordan, Falcon, Black, Plummer next year, Ioane Sopoaga, West who at any one time are going to be 3, 4, and 5 in NZ order. You've TKB, Smith, now Perenara, Weber, even Ruru is having a standout season and ALL would be better than the 3rd best local in Hotham or Christie. Now weve got last season statistical best full back leaving in Stevenson, he's joining Moorby and Rayasi, Bridge, and god knows who else who's having an awesome year that would break him into the All Blacks if it was in Super Rugby. Midfield is stacked when at home would be scratching around for guys like the Umaga-Jensen boys hoping they were fit to fill out 4 or 5th best 2nd5 and centers, when the likes of TJ Faiane, Nankiville, Seta, Aso, Fekitoa, Goodhue, Leicester, Ngani, even one of my fav Rob Thompson would be better than getting down to picks like Aumua, Ennor, McCleod, Tupea, and those that would have to come after them. We've got some of my fav loosies in Lachlan Boshier, Charlie Gamble, Whetu Douglas overseas, now Akira, never my talented players like.


I think your top 60 must have be a picture of the 36 man Crusaders squad plus a list of last years All Blacks! Obviously I've gone off track here as sure, these players leave a big whole but it's not one that NZ hasn't been able to fill in the past while maintaining quality SR sides (the periods when it was rocking), but there will be a time when loosing too many of those quality players has a much bigger impact than the already currently disillusioned SR fan can take.


Bottom line is Australia have far more talent and players that we do (statistically) and all that would need to have in the short term to fix your perceived problem with Super Rugby is trade some the best NZ players into the Aus sides. Simple, problem solved, competitive comp achieved.

cut off super rugby and stop the bleeding . put all the money back into the remaining competitions

Is too quick, many will see it as an opportunity to leave and that starts the very risky slope. You have to have a plan. Any change needs to be gradual and with a better future prospect, until then, voices like yours are only going to undermine any possible immediate success.

87 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Is the overlap dying in modern rugby? Is the overlap dying in modern rugby?
Search