3 hot takes as Steve Borthwick names England team to visit Wales
Thursday was like old times with new England boss Steve Borthwick. His opening two team selection conferences had been very lively affairs, the axing of Manu Tuilagi and the benching of Marcus Smith headlining the respective round one and two narratives, but his round three XV naming was a throwback to the sedate nature of his media dealings when in charge at Leicester.
With only one change being made to his England starting team to take on Wales this Saturday, Anthony Watson replacing the injured Ollie Hassell-Collins, the drama of recent weeks was notably absent.
Add to this how Borthwick wasn’t as elaborate with his answers on this occasion and it all made for a tick-box exercise before he hurried away to catch the team bus to Cardiff ahead of what will be his first away match as the England boss.
That didn’t mean there wasn’t plenty of food for thought reading between the lines of this latest England selection. Here are three RugbyPass hot takes:
Naming Lawes as just a sub
The decision by Borthwick to only name Courtney Lawes on the bench suggested a coach who is very optimistic about the make-up of his current starting pack. England have again named all eight forwards who started in the round two win over Italy, seven of which were also round one starters against Scotland.
Openside, where Jack Willis got the nod against the Italians to take over from Ben Curry, has been the only one-to-eight change across the three team selections. It’s a consistency that contrasts wildly with Wales, who have retained just three of the starting pack hammered by the Scots – skipper Ken Owens, lock Adam Beard and rookie blindside Christ Tshiunza.
What gives regarding England? Borthwick is on message about how poor his team’s set-piece was in the latter games under Eddie Jones, finger jabbing that their scrum, maul and lineout wasn’t fit for purpose compared to the unit that reached the 2019 Rugby World Cup final when Borthwick was in charge of the forwards as an assistant under Jones.
The new head coach believes that selection consistency is the major way to rebuild his pack’s foundations and his decision to hold Lawes in reserve at the Principality is a ringing endorsement regarding how he views young Ollie Chessum at lock and Lewis Ludlam at blindside.
Comments would have been muted had Lawes been named as a starter now that he is fit in place of either Chessum or Ludlam, but Borthwick is a fan of both those forwards given what he has said about them in public so far this month.
To drop either player would have hit their confidence hard, so Borthwick is boxing clever by keeping both in the XV for now and having Lawes as plan B if things don’t work out in the opening 50 minutes in Cardiff.
All silent this week on the Faz/Smith front
Just a fortnight ago, Borthwick was deluged by questions on the benching of Smith, a decision that resulted in skipper Owen Farrell switching into out-half from inside centre and allowing England to rekindle the raw midfield partnership of Ollie Lawrence and Henry Slade.
There wasn’t a whisper about that same selection being unveiled for the trip to Wales which suggests the media are generally onside with what Borthwick is trying to do to ignite the English backline which had been depowered under Jones.
Thing is, though, it was brute forward power that laid the platform for the round two win over the Italians, Willis, Chessum and Jamie George all scoring from close range before a penalty try for a maul infringement secured the four-try bonus point.
It was only when sub scrum-half Alex Mitchell went on a crossfield wander that Henry Arundell, his fellow replacement, got the backs on the scoreboard a couple of minutes before Smith was given a late cameo that didn’t produce.
That all suggested the emphasis following the round one loss to Scotland was on getting back to basics, permitting the forwards to do their thing reliably and having less of a demand on the backs to create. That restricted approach worked against the Italians but you feel England will have to produce more cunning in the backs if they are to expose Welsh vulnerabilities.
All eyes then on Farrell to really show why he is now the favoured No10 and that it indeed remains the correct decision by Borthwick not to go with Smith in that particular role.
The ‘magnificent’ Watson verdict
It’s been 23 months since Watson last played for England as a starter but that gap will now be closed in Cardiff when he runs out wearing the No11 jersey vacated by the injured Hassell-Collins. As much as some fans would have liked to see how Arundell would cope in getting what would have been his first-ever Test start, having Watson start and the London Irish youngster warning the bench for later is probably for the best.
Arundell showed with his score in the corner versus Italy that he has quite the knack for exposing tiring defenders and is the better bet to generate as a replacement rather than have Watson reprise the role he had earlier this month versus Scotland.
There were 15 minutes remaining when Watson replaced Hassell-Collins at Twickenham but that game’s conclusion largely passed him by with the Scots pouncing for the victory. Having ruptured his ACL in October 2021 with Bath, Watson was a Leicester player signed by Borthwick by the time he was fit to return to action and he has so far made 11 appearances for the Tigers, scoring four tries.
Borthwick was chuffed he could now pick him to start a Test. “I took the opportunity to sign him in club rugby and from the day he walked in (at Leicester) he was magnificent – the professionalism, the way he prepared himself, the way he helped the younger players, how much he cares as a professional.
“I use that word a lot. Sometimes from the outside, you don’t see how much how these guys care. He cares deeply about this team, playing for England. It’s great to have him.”
ENGLAND (vs Wales, Saturday – 4:45pm): 15. F Steward (Leicester); 14. M Malins (Saracens), 13. H Slade (Exeter), 12. O Lawrence (Bath), 11. A Watson (Leicester); 10, O Farrell (Saracens, capt), 9. J van Poortvliet (Leicester); 1. E Genge (Bristol), 2. J George (Saracens), 3. K Sinckler (Bristol), 4. M Itoje (Saracens), 5. O Chessum (Leicester), 6. L Ludlam (Northampton), 7. J Willis (Toulouse), 8. A Dombrandt (Harlequins). Reps: 16. J Walker (Harlequins), 17. M Vunipola (Saracens), 18. D Cole (Leicester), 19. C Lawes (Northampton), 20. B Curry (Sale), 21. A Mitchell (Northampton), 22. M Smith (Harlequins), 23. H Arundell (London Irish).
Comments on RugbyPass
Beaches? In Cardiff? Where?
1 Go to commentsHe is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
2 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
2 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
9 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
9 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to commentsThanks for the write up. Great to see the Rebs winning, I am a little interested in how they will go against the remaining kiwi teams, I think they’ve only played Hurricanes and Highlanders but how great to see these players performing!! I also see Parling has a job beyond June 30! A good move by RA? Also how do you fix the Rebels previously scratchy defence?
86 Go to commentsbe smart - go black
14 Go to comments