Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Which Australian Super Rugby teams have learned their lessons from last year?

By Chips Blanch

With Super Rugby one sleep away it’s a good time to look at the Australian sides as each team has a couple of trials under the belt and there is that unmistakable air of optimism a new season brings.

ADVERTISEMENT

The trials themselves have been more readily available than in years gone by as each team (commendably) streams the fixtures when they can so punters like myself can get a feel for how the teams are tracking and how they might fare come round one.

Now you’ll hear plenty of pearls of wisdom at this time of year along the lines of “Premierships aren’t won in January” or “You can’t read too much into trial form” but honestly, I call phooey on that. Too many key players missing from two teams in particular looks set to result in a slow start for nearly all of the Australian teams.

After a disastrous couple of seasons we can’t afford a slow start if we want to win back crowds and the players themselves need success early to build the belief required to win flags. I understand it is a World Cup year but surely regaining some parity at Super Rugby is a priority as well.

If we look back at last season, outside of the general malaise there were some specific shortcomings for each team that really stood out. So how do we gauge who has actively worked to rectify them and get a podium finish? Easy, trials.

Let’s start with the best Australian team last year, the Waratahs. You don’t need to be a keen student of the game to see that the biggest factor in how well the Waratahs perform is their forward pack. The backline is stacked with ability and when you give them front foot ball they can carve anyone up. We all remember the end result when guys like Cliffy Palu and Jacques Potgieter were hammering away at the gain line. So given that last year they failed to win the collision up front in the matches they lost, you would think there is an obvious recruitment mandate.

Maybe I am missing something because they haven’t recruited that way at all.

ADVERTISEMENT

They have built depth smartly in the backline but the forwards have mostly been a case of promoting from their academy. Yes they have brought in a big bopper from South Africa but no one of the class of Potgieter and while the forward pack is full of players with potential, it isn’t going to scare anyone right now or give you better front foot ball. We saw this in particular in the Brumbies trial at the scrum and maul where the Waratahs struggled to stay in the contest and their forwards only started to get some go forward in the loose towards the back end of the fixture.

Next we’ve got the Rebels and if this team isn’t the great hope of Aussie fans I must be reading  the wrong mail. They have incredible depth and talent to burn but were inconsistent for much of last season which was to be expected after the influx of Western Force players. Teams don’t click overnight.

At times they also lacked direction at flyhalf and the recruitment of Quade Cooper is seen by nearly all to be a masterstroke.

Anytime you have a new 10 however, particularly one like Cooper, there is an even greater need for your first choice XV to be on paddock together and we really didn’t see that during the trials. We saw a lot of fringe players get an opportunity so the Rebels will be go into round 1 with what will be the first real hitout for a good percentage of the team. How quickly the team gets into Quade’s rhythm could well be the determining factor of their season.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the sake of my narrative I’ll look at the Reds next and their most obvious shortcomings last year boil down to experience and direction. Similar to the Waratahs they have promoted mostly from within and I think the organisation is cognizant of there being more hurt before the playing group matures and results are expected.

That leaves us with the Brumbies and having watched their two trials I feel they are the team that have taken the best steps to improve their game. Firstly they have recruited seasoned individuals in guys like James Slipper, Toni Pulu, Murray Douglas and Pete Samu which will mean they aren’t relying on inexperience when Wallabies are rested. The competition for spots in the backrow, wings and at inside centre is going to be intense and it is exciting to see who will get the nod as the season progresses.

They have also recognised a need to return to the more expansive style of old and we saw a number of well worked and long range tries in the trials. Crucially, in my mind, they have also given their best players in the key positions of 8, 9, 10 and 15 a good amount of game time which can only put the team in a better position to win in the early rounds. Their only real shortcoming so far is a tendency to let the opposition back into the match after scoring points which is a relatively easy fix.

Maybe I’m wrong and trial form means nothing in the context of a season. I really hope I am wrong and the teams aren’t as short of a run as they look because we need to get some level pegging back with NZ. My gut however says there is only one Australian team that will be primed for it come round 1 and that is our most successful Super Rugby team, the Brumbies.

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 24 minutes ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Had hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”

6 Go to comments
S
Sam T 6 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 13 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

6 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search