Union's answer to State of Origin: Why the North v South game needs to come back
2018’s opening chapter of rugby league’s State of Origin in Australia was one that caught the eye of many rugby union followers across the ditch in New Zealand.
As one of Australia’s most high-profile yearly sporting events, State of Origin draws in an enviably large audience across Australasia. It’s a rarity for stadiums to not sell out, and sports fans are captivated by the majesty surrounding the event as they tune in from across
the continent.
While many Kiwi fans enjoyed New South Wales’ 22-12 victory over Queensland as much as the 87,000 that crammed into the Melbourne Cricket Ground to watch the spectacle a fortnight ago, some must have begged the question as to why New Zealand rugby hasn’t formulated their own version of the three-match series?
It used to exist in the form of the annual North Island vs South Island contest in the days of the amateur era, but it came to a standstill following the North’s comprehensive 63-22 victory at Oamaru’s Centennial Park in 1995.
A one-off fixture took place in 2012 at Forsyth Barr Stadium in Dunedin as a fundraising effort for the financially embattled Otago Rugby Football Union, but that was the 80th and final instalment of the once iconic fixture.
Since its dissolution as an annual clash, there has been a gap in New Zealand rugby tradition that fans across the country have been craving.
Much like State of Origin, it was a contest founded upon a rivalry between the two regions that still exists today, and that rivalry stems from the pride that is instilled within Kiwis based on where they and their families call home.
That regional pride is ever-present in modern day New Zealand, and one only needs to look as far as the Mitre 10 Cup and the Heartland Championship to get a glimpse of it.
However, it isn’t as evident as it once was back in the NPC heyday of the 20th century. The second coming of annual North vs South encounters would not only reignite and amplify the passion Kiwis have for their respective regions on a national scale, but it would help them rediscover a sense of tribalism that is desperately vacant from all facets of the New Zealand sporting landscape.
That tribalism is what separates State of Origin from a vast array of other sporting events across Australasia, and it’s what is so vitally needed in not just New Zealand rugby, but in the whole of New Zealand sport.
Continue reading below
Although the development of Super Rugby has undoubtedly aided the unprecedented dominance in world rugby by New Zealand teams, the professional nature of its existence has evaporated the old-school, atmospheric rivalries – eg, Auckland vs Canterbury – that was so prominent among both players and fans alike in the amateur era, and with it has gone the tribal attitude and loyalty that players and fans felt towards their provinces.
The sight of overflowing crowds in the stands as provinces fight for NPC glory while fans give everything they’ve got to support the men representing their region is now a thing of the past, and that’s the result of a lost sense of rivalry and tribalism within New Zealand rugby
culture that’s come with the professionalism of the game.
State of Origin has never lost sight of that. Supporters of both New South Wales and Queensland are unrelenting and are among the wildest sporting fans you’ll find in this corner of the globe.
Given the similarities in the concept of honouring your roots in State of Origin and North vs South, the re-emergence of the latter has the potential to bring back that overwhelming feeling of fandom and passion that was once embedded in this nation’s rugby identity, and
is still easily identifiable in Australian rugby league’s most sought after series.
The lure of the nation’s best players representing the island of which they qualify for – in accordance to State of Origin eligibility rules (which includes where you were born, where you lived on the most growing up, and where you were educated the most) – would make it impossible for fans to not throw their support behind such an intriguing contest that would have the star power and quality of a top-class test match.
For a 115-year tradition of this magnitude with so much potential to have been brought to an abrupt halt at the dawn of the professional age can be described as a tragedy of sorts, so surely the chance to match State of Origin with the reinstallation of our own North vs South
should be seriously considered.
Potential North vs South line-ups (under State of Origin rules):
North Island:
1 – Kane Hames (Birthplace: Wellington; School(s): Te Aute College/Trident High School)
2 – Dane Coles (Paraparaumu; Paraparaumu College/Wellington College)
3 – Nepo Laulala (Samoa; Wesley College)
4 – Scott Barrett (New Plymouth; Francis Douglas Memorial College)
5 – Sam Whitelock (Palmerston North; Feilding High School)
6 – Liam Squire (Palmerston North; Palmerston North Boys’ High School)
7 – Sam Cane (Reporoa; Reporoa College/Tauranga Boys’ College)
8 – Kieran Read (Papakura; Rosehill College/St Kentigern College)
9 – Aaron Smith (Palmerston North; Feilding High School)
10 – Beauden Barrett (New Plymouth; Francis Douglas Memorial College)
11 – Rieko Ioane (Auckland; Auckland Grammar School)
12 – Sonny Bill Williams (Auckland; Mount Albert Grammar School)
13 – Jack Goodhue (Whangarei; Mount Albert Grammar School)
14 – Waisake Naholo (Fiji; Wanganui City College)
15 – Jordie Barrett (New Plymouth; Francis Douglas Memorial College)
Reserves:
16 – Codie Taylor (Levin; Feilding High School/Horowhenua College)
17 – Karl Tu’inukuafe (Auckland; Wesley College)
18 – Ofa Tu’ungafasi (Tonga; Mangere College)
19 – Tom Franklin (Opotiki; St Paul’s Collegiate School)
20 – Ardie Savea (Wellington; Rongotai College)
21 – TJ Perenara (Porirua; Mana College)
22 – Lima Sopoaga (Wellington; Wellington College)
23 – Nehe Milner-Skudder (Taihape; Queen Elizabeth College)
South Island:
1 – Joe Moody (Birthplace: Christchurch; School(s): Christ’s College)
2 – Ash Dixon (Christchurch; Christchurch Boys’ High School)
3 – Owen Franks (Motueka; Christchurch Boys’ High School)
4 – Patrick Tuipulotu (Christchurch; St Peter’s College)
5 – Brodie Retallick (Amberley; Christchurch Boys’ High School)
6 – Elliot Dixon (Christchurch; St Bede’s College)
7 – Matt Todd (Christchurch; Kaiapoi High School/Christchurch Boys’ High School)
8 – Liam Messam (Blenheim; Rotorua Boys’ High School)
9 – Mitchell Drummond (Nelson; Nelson College)
10 – Richie Mo’unga (Christchurch; Riccarton High School/St Andrew’s College)
11 – David Havili (Nelson; Motueka High School/Nelson College)
12 – Ryan Crotty (Nelson; Shirley Boys’ High School)
13 – Anton Lienert-Brown (Christchurch; Christchurch Boys’ High School)
14 – Ben Smith (Dunedin; King’s High School)
15 – Damian McKenzie (Invercargill; Christ’s College)
Reserves:
16 – Braydon Mitchell (Invercargill; King’s High School/Southland Boys’ High School)
17 – Tim Perry (Ashburton; St Andrew’s College)
18 – Atu Moli (Gisborne; Malborough Boys’ College)
19 – Luke Romano (Nelson; Christchurch Boys’ High School)
20 – James Lentjes (Christchurch; St Bede’s College)
21 – Josh Renton (Dunedin; Otago Boys’ High School)
22 – Mitch Hunt (Nelson; Nelson College)
23 – Michael Collins (Queenstown; Wakatipu High School/Otago Boys’ High School)
In other news:
Comments on RugbyPass
I hope WRU cops a 12 month ban.
1 Go to commentsOuch. Pumped. Even Nohamba is a better flyhalf than Ford.
2 Go to commentsI hope Leinster’s proud of themselves fielding a poor team. They should decide if they’re all in or not.
2 Go to commentsJordie is looking at 16 games maximum if Leinster reach both the URC and champions cup finals. Thats not guaranteed. Some of those home URC fixtures will be cakewalks as well for Leinster and there is not much doing during the 6 nations in Feb and March so he can probably get a decent rest then. He will have to really put in it for maybe 7 or 8 games max. It should be a good move for both.
13 Go to commentsThe game was a quarter final, not a semi final. Barrett will be here for 6 months, he is no one's replacement at 13. That mantle will most likely ultimately go to Jamie Osborne, though Garry Ringrose has at least 4 more years in him. The long term problem position (in the next 3 years) for Leinster is tighthead prop, though there are a couple of prospects at schools level.
27 Go to commentsSo much for all that hype surrounding the ‘revival’ of Aussie rugby. The Blues were without the likes of regular starters Perofeta, Sullivan, Christie etc… This was a capitulation of the highest order by Australia’s finest. Joe Schmidt definitely has his work cut out for him.
2 Go to commentsYes they can ignore Sotutu. Like Akira Ioane plays OK at Super level but gets lost in tests. Too many chances too many failures.
2 Go to commentsA wallaby front-row of Bell, Blake and Tupou…now that would be hefty
1 Go to comments“But with an exceptional pass accuracy rating “ Which apart from Roigard is not a feature of any of the other 9s in NZ. Kind of basic for a Black 9 dont.you. think? Yet we keep seeing FC and TJ being rated ahead of him? Weird if it’s seen as vital to get our backline beating in your face defences.
1 Go to commentsThanks BeeMc! Looks like many teams need extra time to settle from the quadrennial northern migration. I think generally the quality of the Rugby has held up. Fiji has been fantastic and fun to watch
13 Go to commentsLets compare apples with apples. Lyon sent weak team the week before, but nobody raised an eyebrow. Give the South African teams a few years to build their depth, then you will be moaning that the teams are too strong.
41 Go to commentsDid footballs agents also perform the scout role at some time? I’m surprised more high profile players haven’t taken up the occupation, great way to remain in the game and use all that experience without really requiring a lot of specific expertise?
1 Go to commentsSuper rugby is struggling but that has little to do with sabbaticals. 1. Too many teams from Aust and NZ - should be 3 and 4 respectively, add in 2 from Japan, 1 possibly 2 from Argentina. 2. Inconsistent and poor refereeing, admittedly not restricted to Super rugby. Only one team was reffed at the breakdown in Reds v H’Landers match. Scrum penalty awarded in Canes v Drua when No 8 had the ball in the open with little defence nearby - ideal opportunity to play advantage. Coming back to Reds match - same scrum situation but ref played advantage - Landers made 10 yards and were penalised at the breakdown when the ref should have returned to scrum penalty. 3. Marketing is weak and losing ground to AFL and NRL. Playing 2 days compared with 4. 4. Scheduling is unattractive to family attendance. Have any franchises heard of Sundays 2pm?
13 Go to commentsAbsolutely..all they need is a chance in yhe playoffs and I bet all the other teams will be nervous…THEY KNOW HOW TO WIN IM THE PLAYOFFS..
2 Go to commentsI really hope he comes back and helps out with some coaching.
1 Go to commentsI think we are all just hoping that the Olympic 7s doesn’t suffer the same sad fate as the last RWC with the officials ruining the spectacle.
1 Go to commentsPersonally, I’ve lost the will to even be bothered about the RFU, the structure, the participants. It’s all a sham. I now simply enjoy getting a group of friends together to go and watch a few games a year in different locations (including Europe, the championship, etc). I feel extremely sorry for the real fans of these clubs who are constantly ignored by the RFU and other administrators. I feel especially sorry for the fans of clubs in the Championship who have had considerable central funding stripped away and are then expected to just take whatever the RFU put to them. Its all a sham, especially if the failed clubs are allowed to return.
10 Go to commentsI’m guessing Carl Hayman would have preferred to have stayed in NZ with benefit of hindsight. Up north there is the expectation to play twice as many games with far less ‘player management’ protocols that Paul is now criticising. Less playing through concussions means longer, healthier, careers. Carter used as the eg here by Paul, his sabbatical allowed him to play until age 37. OK its not an exact science but there is far more expectations on players who sign for Top 14 or Engl Prem clubs to get value for the huge salaries. NZR get alot wrong but keeping their best players in NZ rugby is not one of them. SA clubs are virtually devoid of their top players now, no thanks. They cant threaten the big teams in the Champions Cup, the squads have little depth. Cant see Canes/Chiefs struggling. Super has been great this year, fantastic high skill matches. Drua a fantastic addition and Jaguares will add another quality team eventually. Aus teams performing strongly and no doubt will benefit with the incentive of a Lions tour and a home RWC. Let Jordie enjoy his time with Leinster, it will allow the opportunity for another player to emerge at Canes in his absence.
13 Go to commentsLove that man, his way to despise angry little men is so funny ! 😂
6 Go to comments“South African franchises would be powerhouses if we had all our overseas based players back in situ. We would have the same unbeatable aura the Toulouses, Leinsters or Saracens of this world have had over the last decade or so.” Proof that Jake white does not understand the economics of the game in SA. Players earning abroad are not going to simply come back and represent the bulls. But they might if they have a springbok contract.
26 Go to comments