Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Tuivasa-Sheck's code swap a cautionary tale for Suaalii and Rugby Australia

Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images

It’s hard to make the transition from rugby league to rugby.

Was the big money spent on getting Roger Tuivasa-Sheck from the Warriors to Blues worth it? Could New Zealand Rugby (NZR) have gotten more value from retaining All Blacks midfielders such as Ngani Laumape and Seta Tamanivalu instead? Maybe.

ADVERTISEMENT

But if the Tuivasa-Sheck experiment has taught us anything, it’s that there’s a lot more to rugby than just running with the ball and tackling.

Rugby Australia chairman Hamish McLennan has made plenty of mileage out of prising Joseph Suaalii from the Roosters’ hands and into the Waratahs’ from 2024.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Emboldened, McLennan has talked of getting other league players with rugby backgrounds – such as Angus Crichton and Cameron Murray – to cross the code divide as well.

McLennan might be careful what he wishes for.

Or at least cast his mind towards Wendell Sailor, Lote Tuqiri, Mat Rogers, Benji Marshall and now Tuivasa-Sheck.

Israel Folau was probably a qualified success in rugby, but you’d have to suggest few modern-day rugby league players ever replicate their previous deeds once in the 15-man game.

If there is heart to be taken by Suaalii signing with rugby, it’s in the form of Laumape.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like Laumape was, Suaalii isn’t too far removed from his 1st XV days. In Tuivasa-Sheck’s case, it was 10 years since he’d played schoolboy rugby and the game was simply not the same.

Even so, Laumape was far from an overnight success when he joined the Hurricanes from the Warriors. He could carry the ball well, but there was little else in his repertoire.

Developing kicking and passing skills are one thing, but the collision areas are so different in the two sports. There’s no real contest for possession in rugby league, no work at the breakdown to be done.

The space and the speed and the angles of everything are all different. The ball might be similar and the dimensions of the field, but the overall similarities are becoming increasingly scant.

ADVERTISEMENT

Did he never possess the breadth of skills to succeed in rugby? Without wanting to be unkind, you’d have to say probably not.

Instinct is everything and that split-second of indecision can be what separates the elite players from the competent ones.

If you’re having to think ‘what am I meant to do here?’ Then the moment is lost.

So good luck with Suaalii. Good luck getting Crichton, Murray or even Roosters coach Trent Robinson to shine with Rugby Australia as well, which McLennan recently floated too.

I’m not going to be critical of Tuivasa-Sheck for his modest performances with the Blues or even NZR for that matter.

But I am definitely going to suggest that investing in the talent you have is better than plucking stars from an increasingly different game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
A
Andrew 403 days ago

RTS came back to rugby far too late. Lost all the instincts vital to a more complex intelligent game.3..4 yrs earlier and doing his aplrenticeship at the Saders or Chiefs and he might have made it.

M
MitchO 426 days ago

RTS at his size and without the defensive nous was never going to make 12 in a short space of time. He could have been a Jason Robinson type. He never had the size for 12. Stupid.

f
flyinginsectshrimp 427 days ago

Did he never possess the breadth of skills to succeed in rugby? Without wanting to be unkind, you’d have to say probably not.
What? Laumape had developed a beautiful kicking game with potential for more, plus a good distribution game before NZR sh*t the bed and lowballed him .

G
Gary 427 days ago

Suaalii is a very good player, however paying the price that RA did is quite over the top. He was a rep player as a young player and then went to League where he excelled. If RA were paying half the price it would be a good risk, but IMO RA should be a bit more circumspect about the money that they are outlaying to buy players. Perhaps there could be a bit of money injected into club rugby that has sustained RA throughout the years since professionalism occurred.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 2 hours ago
'One of the poorest All Blacks performances I've seen in a long time'

Extreme hyperbole from Biggar. NZ have played far, far worse than that. The 20/21 team was by far the worst of the professional era. Losses to Argentina, shambolic game against Japan and hapless NH tour of 2021. But even that dreadful team were able to put 50 points on Wales and beat them by 38. Much easier to “tear them to pieces” from the commentary box apparently. Ignored by virtually everyone is how good the ABs defence was. That is why England didn’t win, they simply could not score enough points against that defence. The ABs attack was very average, but their defence was world class and that’s what won them the game. Any Wales team that Biggar has ever played for would have found themselves in the same situation and would definitely not have scored tries from those cross kicks. That ABs team beats Biggar’s best Wales team 31 - 13. England’s attack was as good as it was allowed to be by a superior defence. Hats off to Hansen, he has picked up where MacLeod finally got the ABs to last year and not missed a step. England’s attack will be a big worry for Borthwick. They have not established a reliable, repeatable way to break teams down and score points. They were held to some very low scores by average teams in the 6N, and again here didn’t cross 20 points on either occasion. If I was an England fan I would be crying out for a new attack coach. Borthwick would do well to cast his net now, a poor home winter with a faltering attack will start the calls for his job.

18 Go to comments
T
Thomas 2 hours ago
'Champions get up when they can't': Matt Williams weighs in on Ireland's win over Boks

While both teams have their particular positives, I think neither team should rest on their laurels. South Africa managed to tie a series against an uncomfortable opponent, that has had their numbers for a couple of years, while trial-running a completely new attack system, that still doesn’t work properly. But one aspect of “it doesn’t work yet” is a transition from attack to defense in broken play, as the Boks leaked three tries in two matches this way, and lost the second match as a result. Ireland avoided a series loss in a hostile environment, and in spite of many key player injuries, while managing to significantly improve and tighten their defense in game 2 (which demonstrates the breadth of their squad as well as their ability to adjust and recalibrate). At the same time, their own attack hadn’t amounted to much, either (save from exploiting the gaps in the Boks’ new system, gaps that won’t be there anymore in a few months’ time), and they haven’t found an answer to the Boks scrum, which almost costed them the 2nd match, if it hadn’t been for pretty much unrepeatable Frawley heroics. In the end, there isn’t much that separates those two sides … which is exactly what we knew before the series already. Back to the drawing board for both teams, the work only just begins for two teams with the highest ambition. Start of a cycle alright.

16 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland coach Andy Farrell: 'I’m jealous of that' Ireland coach Andy Farrell: 'I’m jealous of that'
Search