Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Toby Flood: 'Horrible and nasty' duo made difference for England

England pair Ollie Chessum and George Martin (Photo by Hans van der Valk/BSR Agency/Getty Images)

Toby Flood has hailed the influence of Leicester duo Ollie Chessum and George Martin in firing up England in the Guinness Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Steve Borthwick’s squad enjoyed a March renaissance which saw them upset the double Grand Slam-chasing Ireland and come within a late penalty kick of winning away in France and finishing in second place.

Chessum started the tournament as the second row partner to Maro Itoje. However, with Martin making his return from injury as a round three replacement against Scotland, Borthwick decided to shift Chessum to blindside for the closing two matches so that Martin could be included as a second row starter.

Video Spacer

Ireland dominated every Six Nations stat that mattered | RPTV

Beyond 80 wrap up this year’s Six Nations, as Ireland came out on top yet again. Watch the full episode exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

Video Spacer

Ireland dominated every Six Nations stat that mattered | RPTV

Beyond 80 wrap up this year’s Six Nations, as Ireland came out on top yet again. Watch the full episode exclusively on RugbyPass TV

Watch now

The decision worked a treat as Chessum and Martin flourished in those games and their performances have now been acclaimed by Flood, the retired England out-half, who told OLBG: “They do look to the manor born.

“I saw on social media about Ollie’s output on a Wattbike. There were raised eyebrows at the incredible things he was doing. Athletically he is a freak. He is the natural heir to Courtney Lawes.

Six Nations

P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
Ireland
5
4
1
0
20
2
France
5
3
1
1
15
3
England
5
3
2
0
14
4
Scotland
5
2
3
0
12
5
Italy
5
2
2
1
11
6
Wales
5
0
5
0
4

“I remember seeing Martin in the corridors at Leicester and I was talking to Matt Smith, an old teammate who was the academy coach at the club. Matt doesn’t give out praise easily, but he pointed at George and said, ‘He’s proper.’

ADVERTISEMENT

“The pair of them provide the grunt and just whack people. They are horrible and nasty in the best possible meaning. You have to have that when you come across big packs like France. You need to have people who can repeatedly go to the well. They really look serious. You can sense when someone has got it and they do have it.”

Flood claimed that the selection of both Chessum and Martin as starters allowed Maro Itoje to contribute better than he had done in February. “Maro was difficult and mischievous; he looked like he was beginning to enjoy his rugby again.

“Those two playing as they did free up Maro to go about his business and not worry about other parts of his game he might not be so proficient at.”

Flood, meanwhile, compared the influence of George Ford as the No10 as similar to the effect of football’s Mo Salah with Liverpool. “I have always been a huge fan of George’s. He is a fantastic player. He is slight so people will target him, but his ability in terms of understanding the game is up there with the best.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He is another coach on the field. They talked about Jordan Henderson being that for Liverpool before he left, telling everyone what to do and people asking him. Mo Salah would be very similar.

“George still has time on his side. He has only just turned 31. He can easily make another Rugby World Cup. To have him in amongst that squad with his knowledge and with Marcus Smith as back-up, they have quality and the luxury of two players who are very, very good.”

Flood named Tommy Freeman as his breakthrough England player and Ben Earl as his England player of the tournament, while he named Ireland out-half Jack Crowley as his top player overall.

Related

“Tommy Freeman just looks natural at international level, a player who can fit in incredibly well. He looked like he didn’t miss a beat. He looked like somebody very much at home in the international arena. He didn’t look worried about the expectations.

“There were question marks about Ben before the tournament about whether he was big enough and powerful enough as a No8, but his feet, movement and ability to beat a man were outstanding. He was just so consistent.”

Regarding his best overall pick, Flood explained: “I have a big soft spot for Thomas Ramos but it is hard to look past Ireland and Jack Crowley who fitted into Johnny Sexton’s shoes very comfortably. He was impressive and managed with ease what everyone felt was going to be a difficult transition.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
T
Tom 454 days ago

Martin is exceptional


Chessum is a very talented player who I think has struggled to make a physical impact in the second row but with the extra space at 6 he's been impressive. I really hope they don't put him back in the second row though, England look so much better with 2 big strong locks.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

I ultimately don’t care who the best club team in the world is, so yeah, lets agree to disagree on that.


I would appreciate clarity on a couple of things though:

Where did I contradict myself?

Saying “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” is entirely compatible with ranking a team as the best - over an extended period - when they have won more games and made more finals than other comparable teams. It would be contradictory for me to say “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.” and then completely ignore Leinster record of winning games and making finals.


“You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself.”

What you said (that I think trophies matter) is true, in that I said “Trophies matter. They matter a lot. But so does winning games. So does making finals.”. Do you understand that Leinster won more games and made more finals than any other (URC-based) team did under the period under consideration?


“Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.”

I really don’t understand why you would think that this is irrelevant. You seem to be saying that winning trophies is the only thing that matters when assessing who is the best, but doesn’t matter at all when assessing who is 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc.


“What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.”

Well then we’ve just been talking at cross purposes. In that my position (that Leinster were the best team overall in 2022-2024) was pretty clear, and you just decided to respond to a different point (whether Leinster were the best team individually in particular years) essentially making the entire discussion completely pointless. I guess if you think that trophies are the only thing that matters then it makes sense to see the season as an individual event that culminates in a trophy (or not), whereas because I believe that trophies matter a lot, but that so does winning matches and making finals, it makes it easier for me to consider quality over an extended period.

24 Go to comments
M
MT 2 hours ago
Ex-Wallaby laughs off claims Bath are amongst the best in the world

As I said in one of my first replies to you - we can agree to disagree. If you want to leave it no problem. I completely disagree with your ranking of Leinster as the best team in the world. Now you have said you will change it if Bordeaux win the Top 14. Well as Leinster themselves prioritise the CC over the URC and Bordeaux won the CC, how are they not ranked higher by you? Are Leinster one of the best teams, yeah - never said they weren’t. But not the very best team, as the very best team have trophies to show for their seasons. They matter when you discuss the very best.


You can get frustrated and say I am not reading what you write, but when you quote me, then your first line is to say thats true (what I wrote), but by the end of the paragraph have stated something different, thats where you contradict yourself. Just so we are clear, you said you would too on my statement that I would rather be a fan of a team that won a trophy over the three seasons, but end the paragraph saying you would rather be a fan of the team that won the most matches but didn’t win a trophy. Both cant be true. Thats one example of where you contradict yourself.


Pointless comparison on Blackburn and Tottenham to this discussion as no-one includes them on a list of the best club. I would say that Blackburns title season was better than anything Tottenham have done in the Premier League. My reference to the league was that the team who finished second over two seasons are not better than the two other teams who did win the league each time. One of the best - of course, but not the best, which is relevant to my point here about Leinster, not comparing teams who won 30 years ago against a team that never won.


What I referred to in my Leinster wouldn’t say the were the best is your post earlier where you said Leinster were the best overall. You said that in two separate posts. Seasons dont work like that, they are individual. Unless the same team keeps winning then you can say they were the best over a period of time and group them, but thats not the case here.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Dan Lancaster follows Owen Farrell out the door at Racing 92 Dan Lancaster follows Owen Farrell out the door at Racing 92
Search