Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Three isn't going to go into two': Why Trask has trumped Gatland for do-or-die clash

Bryn Gatland and Kaleb Trask. (Photos by Photosport)

Having three classy options to play first five is one of the rare luxuries that the Chiefs can say they’ve got right now.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kaleb Trask takes the reigns and will be asked to marshal the Chiefs backline this weekend against the Hurricanes, a change that makes perfect sense at this point in proceedings.

Bryn Gatland has impressed Chiefs coaches in his first two starts for the Waikato-based franchise, running the cutter reasonably well and showing his experience at Super Rugby level.

Video Spacer

The crew of James Parsons, Ross Karl and Bryn Hall discuss the heavily debated calls by the television match official in both games of round three of Super Rugby Aotearoa.

Video Spacer

The crew of James Parsons, Ross Karl and Bryn Hall discuss the heavily debated calls by the television match official in both games of round three of Super Rugby Aotearoa.

As was the case during his stint with the Highlanders, Gatland hasn’t had a forward pack doing a terribly great job in front of him, but his poise and relative composure could be denied by few.

“We actually really like what Bryn’s brought to the table,” McMillan told media on Thursday. “He’s brought a lot of calmness and direction but Trasky is a little bit more of an attacking player so his challenge will be to get the balance right between controlling and driving us around the right parts of the field and then showcasing his running game.”

It’s fair to say that competition for a spot in the Chiefs backline is one of the more contestable elements for this particular franchise that finds itself with the freedom to experiment given the dismal record of late.

Many would’ve predicted another start for Gatland this week with Trask making his return to top flight footy off the bench but, despite their 0-11 losing streak, there is little logic in having Gatland, Trask, and Damian McKenzie all playing in the same Chiefs match-day squad.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trask comes in for two reasons. Firstly, he’s fit and ready after missing the first two weeks due to a knee issue. Now is as good a time to play him as any and it’s a deserving selection when you think back to the good signs he showed during his rookie season last year.

Secondly, it works well for a guy like McKenzie.

McKenzie already fills in a lot at first receiver despite selection at fullback. Trask did that the same role but in reverse for the Chiefs at points last season, named at first five but doing a fair bit of his work at fullback to allow McKenzie to come in and make that switch whenever the Chiefs saw fit.

“Damo’s gone up into 10 and made a pretty good fist out of both positions so we’re sticking with that formula,” said McMillan. “Unless we have a major shift in thinking, three isn’t going to go into two for most of the season.”

Gatland is that genuine specialist first five option the Chiefs have, and this is an important distinction.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trask is a more attacking type of player in comparison to Gatland, an aspect that is perfectly suited to a duel type of role. Until the Chiefs decide to take the gamble and select McKenzie as a first five, and play him there consistently, there is little to no logic in having a first five specialist coming off the bench.

That’s why it made sense to start Gatland from the outset, in that specialist first five role, and that’s why it makes sense to rest him now because his specialty is something that is set to serve the Chiefs moving forward.

It’s now up to Trask to show that he is a viable solution, not just an option, for the Chiefs in this crucial position. Remember Tiaan Falcon? Some said that he was the next big 10 in Chiefs country, but truth be told, the 22-year old was only ever an option that could fill in when needed.

Falcon consistently battled with injury but it’s fair to argue that fitting him into the Chiefs backline was always particularly challenging, firstly because of his lack of versatility, and secondly, an inability to really command the position in comparison to others.

In Bryn Gatland, the Chiefs now have that out and out first five – and the quality is there for anyone to see. Trask has shown a little bit of quality himself, and he did it primarily at first five for the Chiefs, proving himself to be a bona fide No 10, not just a fill-in running the cutter.

It really is a good problem for the Chiefs to have. At least that’s before the gamble is taken and McKenzie shifts into the role many feel he should have made his own by now.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players'

Yep, hard to find a way to implement it. Legally it can only happen when they're like 18 of course right, and at that point I think they already do that with the youth today. The problem is that it's only the top echelon that can be targeted (not just financially, how can you support more high performance than what you have capacity for etc) and many quality people and rugby players fall outside that group. So once you've gone outside this HP group, others have to follow the path step by step, that's where it's hard to have a holistic approach, to contracting especially, when it has to be mixed in with Union, Club, SR developemtn squads etc.


I'm really a pro creating a national University league. They could legally require players who want to participate to bind themselves to a draft system once they league the college at around 22, which then means they're bound for the first 2/3 years following the draft etc.


That's not completely reliable and a big investment/change in and of itself of course. One other possible way NZR could get investment back is by saying "if our HP pathway doesn't offer you a future and you go overseas, you can still put your hand up to be eligible for our teams, but you won't be compensated for your time", essentially meaning you can get free All Blacks, perhaps saving a few million to invest in keeping other ABs in the country?


The idea being they'll already likely be on a similar wage to ABs (if NZR can't keep up with rising values), and their own value will increase as well as a result of being selected for the ABs, so they essentially get some compensation on their next contract. "we didn't think you'd turn into a international star in the first place, so where not going to punish you for trying your hand overseas" type deal. If you look at Ed's list above though, most of those players have left after that sort of youth developement of course (precisely after, turning 23), but of course it could have still be their AB dream that was keeping them here to prove they should have been part of the HPP, so maybe when they know they're still eligible from overseas, all of that list would have gone earlier (say after missing u20/21 squads etc). Currently that was partly the dilemma with Crusaders predicament last year, they had so many youth stars comming through at 10, they could invest in just getting one of them performing. Much like how Hotham took 4 or 5 games to hit his straps, maybe Kemara just needed one or two more as well, and Crusaders could have done away with the constant swapping around that followed. What I mean is that teams can easily lose not having so many youth fighting amongst themselves. Highlanders are similar, if there was only one HPP spot for Millar or Faleafaga, both have a better chance of developing with increased game time, one at the Highlanders and the other with say a French clubs development side/Pro Div2 companion club. While all those players remain eligible for the All Blacks.

74 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players' 'It doesn’t make sense for New Zealand to deny itself access to world-class players'
Search