Northern | US

Springboks fans demand return of one player in particular ahead of Cape Town

Fans react before the start of the match during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
71 Comments

Springboks fans have urged Rassie Erasmus to bring Handré Pollard back into the starting picture for next week’s Cape Town Test after South Africa’s 33-16 defeat to the All Blacks in the opening match of Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much of the reaction centred on the No.10 jersey, with rising playmaker Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu coming under scrutiny after a difficult afternoon as New Zealand claimed a five-tries-to-one victory.

Pollard, a double World Cup winner who was not involved in the opener, quickly became the focus of calls for change on social media.

VIDEO

One fan posted: “I’m sorry but Handré Pollard is STILL our best flyhalf.”

Another wrote: “Some of you here will learn to respect Handre Pollard and Siya Kolisi.”

Supporters also backed the veteran to make an impact in Cape Town, with one comment reading: “Give us Handre Pollard back in the 23, and let him enter flowstate in Greenpoint.”

Handre Pollard
Rassie Erasmus and Handre Pollard – Getty Images

Others were even more direct.

“Handre Pollard is the answer,” one supporter claimed.

While another added: “Next week we need Handre Pollard at fly half and a more disciplined approach.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The reaction was not limited to the playmaker debate, with some fans highlighting the absence of injured captain Siya Kolisi following a performance in which Erasmus admitted his side were “thoroughly beaten” by the world No.1-ranked All Blacks.

Erasmus highlighted a key turning point in the contest, with the Springboks trailing 19-16 in the 58th minute and applying pressure at scrum time before conceding a penalty on their own feed.

“Even if we had kicked over that scrum penalty and we won we still made a helluva lot of errors,” he said.

“But it wasn’t a wake-up call. There were just so many things that we did wrong and that New Zealand did right – so I’m not going to say we learnt a lot of things from this match.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There would have been a lot of things we’d have to put right even if we had scratched through this match with a one point win.

“We didn’t play well. Against a class team like New Zealand, if you don’t convert, they give you a proper hiding.

“With hindsight, there were a lot of things we didn’t convert; I think there were two or three big moments when we let the game go away from us. Not because we wanted to or because we wanted to make those errors but because New Zealand forced those on to us by being really intense and sharp.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

71 Comments
B
Benji7 45 days ago

I don't understand why Thomas du Toit wasn't starting, with Louw on the bench, or vice versa.


Would be starting Reinach with Libbok next weekend, with Pollard on the bench.

P
PM 44 days ago

I’m yet to see be impressed with Libbock in a test the way I have been SFM or Pollard.

But Pollard suits how they played on Saturday and how they usually play so it’s harder to judge Libbok. As a Wallabies fan I would happily have Libbok. I just don't think he is suited to his country’s style of rugby, much like Marcus Smith’s situation in England.

R
Ruppansy 45 days ago

Boks were poor, albeit under excellent pressure from the AB. They dominated the AB for much of the game, scrums, offense, defence, lineouts. The Boks didn’t take their chances in the 22, their attack didn’t have fluency, 9 and 10 didn’t general the game and the team looked rusty (likely due to too many combinations being used and 9/10 not being the generals) and the bomb squad didn’t have the impact it normally does (which is important in the last 20) which is when the AB won the game. That said, hoping the Boks can bounce back and expect they can if they’re not too nervous and don’t overplay their hand like they did this last game.

H
Hellhound 44 days ago

Dont doubt a bounce back. Just think back to last year when the Boks lost at Eden Park, then absolutely smashed the AB's at Wellington.


Writing off the Boks is the thorny road, full of pain. I love how suddenly the Boks are done, or Rassie overstayed his welcome or how bad the current crop of Boks are and how even Portugal suddenly stand a chance against the Boks.


Fans are funny and the biggest idiots at the same time, but not as bad as the fake journalists claiming to know anything about sports, nevermind rugby, it's culture, the coaching, the tactics or game plans. The Boks will bounce back, and they will be accused again of all sorts of tactics and will actually get cards(not get away with cards like Ardie)


I am more than willing like most Saffas to except a loss in the short term for the long term goal which is the WC. As great as this tour is, there is no other significant use for it other than a money spinner. A great way to get ready for the WC. Both the Boks and AB's are great teams. Test 1 belongs to the AB's and they thoroughly deserved the win.


In fact, this loss will be a very big reminder that no one is invincible. It is only a good thing for the Boks. Getting brought back down to earth, wouldn't you say?

M
Muti 45 days ago

Outside of handling errors the boks were brilliant for 55minutes. SFM made, like, 3 mistakes I can think of. Roigard made a few himself. I love Polly but if the futures of our team don’t get experience in these intense scenarios where will we be in 2027/31? Weren’t Polly, Eban, Siya, PSDT, Kriel, De Allende & Marx all part of the 2017 team that got whacked for 57 against the ABs? We stuck with them and they turned out ok. I’m not saying it was orchestrated, but this team will benefit massively come the sticky end of RWC ‘27 having gone through the experience of needing to win 3 matches on the trot of successive weekends against formidable opponents to secure a trophy. Calm down bok fans, see the bigger picture and embrace the pressure ✌️

H
Hellhound 44 days ago

Everyone seems to forget what happened last year. Boks lost at Eden Park, then smashed the AB's the next week. Not saying that is going to happen, but The Boks isn't a champion team for nothing. They know how to come back and take care of business. Weren't the Boks written off after the first test loss against the Lions too?


The Boks needed the loss to come back down to earth. I hate them losing, but sometimes it's needed. This is one of those times. The players and the fans need it. Time to reset and restart. The WC is close. I'm very happy the AB's is regaining what made them so special. It makes for great footy in the future to come from the best 2 teams in this sport for over a century

E
Eric Elwood 45 days ago

NZ game plan was to keep it close at half time and pull away in the second half. That is what happened. When SA failed to score at 16-19 you could smell a NZ try coming. They narrowly missed with that cruel bounce against Roigard but it was soon coming. NZ made a poor error to give SA initiative again but were easily repelling attacks now.


SA hit NZ back over the gain line the whole first half and could not capitalize. Felix Jones must have been planning that for weeks and I can’t see that happening next time. If anything it will be less kitchen sink from NZ. Remember NZ will consider SAs try as soft.

Libbok is SAs best man but I don’t see SA scoring 30+ which will be the requirement. That NZ counter attack was subdued. It won’t be so much in Capetown.

A
Ayre123 None 45 days ago

Coach Rennie doesn’t like that idea, he prefers the ABs to face Sacha, Libbok and Grant Williams where there is a REAL challenge for the men in black,,, 🤣

“We traveled half the sphere to face the best in business such as Sacha and Libbok,,,”

C
CG 45 days ago

Big Pol’s a donkey

B
B 45 days ago

It was still only their 5th loss in 32 matches. I don’t think Rassie would be that reactionary. Pollard would be a huge step backwards.


Libbok to start and SFM to bench.

A
Ayre123 None 45 days ago

The sport minister said the same😟

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

The moment Rassie Erasmus listens to fans in making selections, we may as well slip back to 7th in the rankings. Fans know fokall.


Off the bench perhaps, in case it comes down to kicks. But Manie is the answer. Pollard has not been on top form for a while.


Throwing the baby out with bath water because of nostalgia.

B
Bazzallina 44 days ago

Libbock all the way but I will be honest before I read the article I was thinking the Tank haha

R
RC 45 days ago

You’ll fall to 7th regardless. Rassie is overcooked. You know when someone stays on just that tiny bit too long? That's what's happening here. And signing him to 2032?? You may as well surrender now.


Kick-boks luck-boks rugby is dead.

P
PM 45 days ago

Pollard is a good player but I don't think he would have made a difference here. ABs played more rugby and weren't as reliant on power, is my impression.


Also thought it seemed like one team that thought they would win if they just executed their game plan, vs one that knew they were gonna have to make special plays and go the extra mile.

B
B 45 days ago

Agree. SFM was sub-par but they still had enough field position and possession to get on the scoreboard. Their #10s inability to boss the game wasn’t why they lost.


I don’t see what Pollard would have brought.

J
J Marc 45 days ago

I think Pollard suits very well to yesterday game plan, better than SFM in fact…

M
Mark 45 days ago

I thought that SA looked a bit one dimensional tbh, when the biff didnt bring the expected result, they seemed to struggle tactically, and without the much vaunted bomb squad bench, they lacked the game changers.

NZ were very good though, both physically and tactically.

H
Hellhound 44 days ago

Heavy rotation, players back from injury or rusty getting a go. No cohesion. Take your pick. No consistent picks except maybe with Kriel and a couple others.


The AB's have been using the same players mostly, got great cohesion and they played very well. The Boks underestimated them. They lost. They won't make the same mistake again

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

The biff did a great job of getting them within striking distance - only for them to squander possession.


The ABS defended better than the Boks too. In causing handling errors but also shutting them down on or near the line.


The Boks defence leaked 5 tries.


Unacceptable by our own standards up to this point.


Had our defence been better, complimenting our biff, and we converted more 22 entries into points, the game was on.

H
HS 45 days ago

Evan Roos?

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Why? For who?


Wiese was massive for us. He made 17 odd carries. If anything were missing a Kwagga off the bench. I’d go with Hanekom ahead of Marco off the bench.

O
Olly 45 days ago

IMO SA strategy was very Northern Hemisphere like. No risk taking and trust in their skills to execute.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

I disagree. The Boks were extremely aggressive on attack and had their handling been better - we would have a much closer test on the scoreboard.


Whilst it wasn’t tonyball or super rugby, it was pretty effective.


Apart from the actually scoring points part.


The boks equaled the ABs in line breaks and entries into the 22m area. But simply couldn’t make it count due to poor handling and good defence from the ABs.

J
J Marc 45 days ago

There are differents strategies in NH, and in SH too….

e
eddieb 45 days ago

They also need to protect the ball. The All Blacks kept dislodging the ball when they tackled the boks. They were probably told to go for the ball and then the player

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

100%


The ABs had a few tactics they excuted perfectly.


All credit to them. Showing a smarts we haven’t seen from them for a while.

e
eddieb 45 days ago

The game took a turn when Steenkamp replaced Nche and when Porthen replaced Louw. Both were out of depth. The back 3 were also found wanting on cover defence.

B
Bazzallina 44 days ago

Wilco was still on for awhile there including ABs scrum and try to Luke J ..mind you don’t think Wilco is made for going 55-60 ..I mean where do they get his shorts made ? from the curtains department at blinds direct booty booty booty everywhere

B
B 45 days ago

They also had their starting #9 as the last defensive player for 3/5 ABs tries. The handling and their defensive shapes can be worked on.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Agreed. The scrum went neutral at this point and the momentum shifted in favoring the ABs.

T
Tiger 45 days ago

We must stop taking 3 points unless we have a good lead. Inviting the ABs back into our 22m to score tries is brainless. They never took one 3 pointer and scored 5 tries.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Scoreboard pressure, when the 3 points were easy.


What they mustn’t do is allow the ABs (or anyone for that matter) to score 5 tries against us.


Our defence wasn’t great at all.

H
Hillie 45 days ago

I dont recall seeing one full back line movement from the Boks in the match…I really would like Rassie to give Ahmed more exposure, backed by Pollard/Libbok on the bench.

Mngomezulu looked very one dimensional and I thought the kicking didn’t bother the ABs that much. No much variation in the Boks play and a lot of dependence on the scrum.

Many players in the Boks are getting on and may just milliseconds slower than their opponents which can be fatal in a fast-paced game. The ABs looked the real deal, which they haven’t for quite a while. If the Wallabies regain their open attacking style the RWC is going to be great!

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Sure, but not in the cauldron of this series. Their time will come.


We’ve thrown youngsters to the wolves in the past and ruined careers.


We have the players in the squad. They just need to perform. Last night was poor but not the end of the world.


We are very capable of losing 2-3 tests a year. Keeps us humble I guess. Let’s hope not 2-3 against the ABs.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 34 minutes ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close