Northern | US

'It was the right call': Dave Rennie weighs in on Ardie Savea's tackle on Jasper Wiese

New Zealand's number eight Ardie Savea tackles South Africa's fly-half Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
31 Comments

A dramatic turning point in the All Blacks 33-16 win over the Springboks came with the All Blacks looking to land the definitive blow with a 10-point lead.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Quinn Tupaea 50-22 turned the screws and had the Boks pinned deep in their 22, but a loose ball turnover ended up in the hands of Jasper Wiese. The No.8 powered through the tackle of Ardie Savea, before the All Blacks captain pinched a breakdown steal two phases later to put New Zealand back on attack.

A grubber kick from Jordie Barrett pinned the Boks on the five, where a strong counter-ruck won back possession, before reserve flanker Marco van Staden played halfback Cam Roigard, coming from a side entry to disrupt play.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

A referral from the TMO asked the officials to look at the original tackle on Wiese by Savea, with Matt Carley ruling no foul play had occurred.

All Blacks head coach Dave Rennie called the decision ‘technically correct’ while Ardie Savea expressed relief of the decision.

“So technically, it’s the right call,” Rennie said when asked post-match.

“So you’ll see the footage that when Ardie hits him, his head comes forward, and so that means that your first impact’s on the body, if the head goes forward.

“If it goes backward, it means first impact is straight on the head. So it’s a really good refereeing, and good to see at this level.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Savea revealed he was nervous when the officials deliberated over the call.

“I’ll be pretty biased tonight that I’m happy for the decision. But yeah, I was nervous, but they made the decision, they made the call, and they worked in our favour.”

After foul play was ruled to have not occurred, the indiscretion by Van Staden on the goal line was ruled to be a professional foul. The ruck had formed and the deliberate side entry illegally played the halfback resulting in a yellow card for the flanker.

From the very next scrum halfback Cobus Rienach attempted a one-hand intercept, resulting in knocking the pass down which resulted in another yellow card.

With a two-man advantage the All Blacks eventually landed the final blow in the 74th minute, captain Ardie Savea floating a pass to the unmarked Will Jordan to go over untouched. A sideline conversion from Ruben Love pushed the lead out to 33-16.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rennie was happy to see the All Blacks take advantage from the momentum shift after being unable to capitalise in the first half on penalties.

“We’re under the pump for for a number of minutes, maybe the next five or six,” he said of the momentum shift.

“And so to come out of that and then get a little bit of territory, and then I think somewhere in there we got a 50-22, and we’re able down there, and we got rewarded.

“We felt we got some penalty advantage early in the game. We just weren’t able to to get any continuity off that to put put the Springboks under pressure or bring the ref into the game, and I thought we were better in that sort of last 20.

“Ended up with a couple of cards, which made the job a little easier.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

31 Comments
B
BigMack 45 days ago

Well that just explained it very simply for me and now makes complete sense:


If the head goes back, obviously that was the point of contact.


If the head comes forward, the shoulder got hit.

J
Joe bloggs 44 days ago

Simple physics 101 - it’s called inertia

J
J Marc 45 days ago

“ attempted a one hand intercepted “… if I don't believe this one, have you an other one for me ?

H
Hard Boiled 45 days ago

South African here. The call on the “head contact” with Wiese was absolutely the right one. I was actually very impressed with how the ref basically told the tmo to fly a kite. Need more of that. TMO’s are way too involved

U
Utiku Old Boy 45 days ago

Agreed. I thought Carley did a very good job in an intense pressure match. We’d rather the refereeing was not pivotal to the outcome and that is what was delivered. The series is living up to expectations!

R
RM 45 days ago

The ref made a lot of mistakes yesterday but that tackle was not one of them, it’s time someone uses common sense regarding head contact. We are just not used seeing this and that's why everyone is so surprised.

T
TokoRFC 45 days ago

Yeah it was a good choice.


BUT of course the ref is going to make some mistakes, they have to make a bunch of 50/50 decisions in real time in every game.


The thing with the TMO is they should be the safety net to catch anything that could change the outcome of the game and for the ref to refer to if need be.

It’s not to go though every ruck and tackle with a fine toothed comb in slow motion.


Really impressed with Carley yesterday

c
chip117 45 days ago

Still wondering why springboks fullback not yellow carded and penalty try for tackling damien without the ball after knocking his pass back

H
Hard Boiled 45 days ago

It was Damian on Damien contact. They cancel each other out didn’t you know?

W
WJ 45 days ago

Yes, the usual defence would be that he was committed to the tackle but the fact that he batted the ball back undermines that. He batted the ball back and then grabbed Dmac. These calls go both ways though so not complaining.

Z
Zac 45 days ago

Agree.that should have been a Penalty try…

S
Sallworth007 45 days ago

It’s odd seeing so many penalties and no yellow card.

w
ww 45 days ago

Yah I was shocked , about 8 yet no yellow card. Is always the case all black have went back to what they do, prepare to try to denie opponent try opportunity and rather consider penalty. I think ref on that one was very very bad. Again Bokke were rusty and is something I predicted.

B
Bruiser 45 days ago

TMO missed clear neck roll by Etzebeth but pinged Holland for same thing

P
PR 45 days ago

The TMO seemed determined to get an AB binned, fortunately the referee was not having it. Rassie will need to sort that out if SA are going to win.

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

Stop whining, if it was the other way around then 100% guaranteed a Bok player would have seen the bin.

R
RC 45 days ago

Rennie 4

Rassie 1


👌🏻🤣👍🏻

J
Jmann 45 days ago

100% the right call. Shoulder to shoulder contact. Head whips forward.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Thanks Nigel Owens

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 34 minutes ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close