Northern | US

'Walking around': Rennie questions Springbok scrumming tactic after set piece struggle

New Zealand's number eight Ardie Savea reacts after his team's victory during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
38 Comments

The All Blacks scrum came under immense pressure all afternoon in Johannesburg with the visitors unable to stabilise the set piece until the reserve front rowers came on.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Springboks used their strength to their advantage, looking to shove the All Blacks off the ball at every opportunity. When halfback Cam Roigard couldn’t get the ball out quickly, the All Blacks were penalised on their own feed multiple times.

South Africa flexed their advantage at scrum time but a key reversal came when the home side doubled down on scrums after winning a penalty in front of the posts, turning down points to go again with the score at 19-16.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The front row replacements for the All Blacks, George Bower, Asafo Aumua, and Fletcher Newell, were able to strengthen the set piece and turn the tables with a penalty of their own in the 55th minute.

All Blacks head coach Dave Rennie said he questioned whether the Springboks were ‘wheeling’ the scrum continuously by ‘walking around’, which he said ended up being penalised in that key moment.

“We will always debate scrums, and I reckon every team does,” Rennie said post-match on the set-piece battle.

“When you get penalised, you question whether they’re walking around. They got penalised for walking around eventually, and and that was probably a key moment in the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks were further aided by the Springboks losing two players in the final 10 to yellow cards, including a flanker. Rennie revealed that loosehead prop Ethan de Groot played through illness.

“We got great impact off the bench. De Groot to be fair, was crook overnight, and but yeah, like we’re really happy with the effort up front, and scrum was really solid in that last sort of 30.

“Gruda [De Groot] went home early from the captain’s run yesterday and spent a large time in bed. And you know he’s tough and he barred up and gave us plenty.”

The All Blacks will have a different starting front row next week after De Groot and lock Josh Lord were forced off after a nasty head clash with each other late in the first half.

ADVERTISEMENT

They will underdog assessments and go through return to play protocol but Rennie was realistic about their chances of playing.

“They’re only only two injuries tonight. Obviously, a head clash, which is problematic long term. Then obviously neither those guys can play on Tuesday, and probably can’t play Saturday, depending on the protocols and what happened on the sidelines.”

Captain Ardie Savea was pleased with the composure the forwards showed to lift the set-piece and win a penalty at the key moment.

“We talked about being composed under tight, tight moments, and you can just hear the boys really present in the moment, and what you can ask for as a leader is just everyone do the job, and everyone did that,” he said.

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

38 Comments
R
RC 45 days ago

More to rugby than scrums and high balls, Rassie.


Rennie 4

Rassie 1


🤣😂🤭

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

Maybe the Boks early push every now and then maybe they angle in or walk around every now and then but bottom line is as a unit they just sync up consistently more than their opponents again and again it’s why they have the title belt .

ABs have to dot the i cross the t every time better through every step of the scrum next week, watch the avoidable penalties in red zone that gives Boks opportunity to pack down and handle the kicks better less knock ons to again limit the opportunity.

It’s not one thing for the ABs to mitigate this imo but multiple fronts snd prob even moreso with Tank probs straight in there but another chance for our boys to show our depth is underrated including front row

M
Mitch 45 days ago

I thought the Bok scrum was legal except for the one where Steenekamp was penalised correctly. On the other ones, I thought they went forward before any “angling in”. The ref had a solid game and anybody complaining about his performance is barking up the wrong tree

c
cnw 46 days ago

Hmmm, a couple of those scrums looked like walking over rather than around. ABs better put a big shift in this week to sort it because the only walking around we might see next week are the yellow carded AB props heading to the side line. And for f…. sake getting Paddy into the starting pack.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

I woke up this morning thinking “Dear God let that have been a bad dream”. Alas, the alarm radio played a different tune - and I realised, it’s Sunday. It wasn’t a bad dream.


I shall pour myself a stiff drink this afternoon (this morning probably) and watch the game again, CNW.


A few thoughts before I do that.


1. I thought the game was pretty one-sided in that 1st half. The ABs looked relieved to kick that ball out at half time. The Boks played well, but had nothing to show for it. Instead the Boks were panicked in the second half and the ABs didn't.


I wonder if they watched that Wallaby game, because it was eerily similar.


2. Obviously handling errors cost the boks dearly - had they converted their hard work into tries, the game would have been on a knife edge towards full-time.


3. But I still think the ABS would have won. They were waiting for their opportunities to strike and took all their chances. They were sharp on finishing, the opposite of the boks. Much like the Wallabies last year.


4. Rearranging our backline after 9 minutes didn’t help. And I wonder why we didn’t keep Damian at 12 and move Esterhuisen to 13. Damian had a quiet game by his own standards. And he’s been a wrecking ball for us at 12. Obviously on defence too.


5. The ABs first two tries were defensive errors. On both occasions Grant William defending the touch line - which I thought was stupid. The smallest guy stopping a charger on the touch. Particularly the first try. It was right in front of us and it was so obvious.


I feel like Manie needs to start and Sacha needs to come off the bench next week. I thought that this week too. Sacha needs to find form, he seems to put himself under pressure to do everything. Whereas Manie is a better distributor and playmaker for those around him.


I thought Willemse was brilliant. Kolbe too. But our scramble defence was poor in comparison to how we’ve played in the past. Which is credit to the ABs. They were diabolical on attack out wide.


PS - I won’t be attending another game of the Boks at Ellis Park. That stadium is obviously haunted. Ever since we poisoned the ABs in 1995… Bad Karma and I’m done with it.

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

There was 1 scrum in the 2nd half where it was bordeline walking around by both teams, otherwise it was like you say. Ox had a very good day in the office again folding Lomax like deckchair in a huricane.


When he was substituted the AB’s got some parity and started to get traction in the game.

A
Alby 45 days ago

Lomax is clearly not the scrummaging tighthead he used to be. Dunno what happened

S
SC 45 days ago

Sam Darry has become as powerful a ball carrier as Tuipulotu under Vern Cotter and has a higher work rate and is a much taller lineout option.


Holland and Darry are the All Blacks two best locks and should be long-term locking partners with Tuipulotu coming of a 6-2 bench.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 1 hour ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close