Northern | US

All Blacks never-say-die grit pays as Rassie sinks his own ship


New Zealand's wing Will Jordan dives to score a try during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
54 Comments

The All Blacks‘ 33-16 win over the Springboks was a classic story of weathering the storm and winning the little moments that matter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite their ‘dominance’, the Springboks were repelled from entries into the 22 and left coming away with zero points on multiple occasions, with the All Blacks delivering on resilience and grit to give themselves a shot in the back end of the game.

A heroic save by Jordie Barrett forced a knock-on from Malcolm Marx when the hooker looked certain to score from a rolling maul. The midfielder’s never-say-die act is no fluke.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

He was the tackler on Bongi Mbonambi two years ago at the same venue from the exact same play, although on that occasion South Africa escaped with five points from a dropped ball. Last year he produced a gladiatorial effort on Cheslin Kolbe in Wellington to deny the winger a try from a kick. Ireland will remember his one-on-one tackle on Ronan Kelleher in the 2023 Rugby World Cup quarter-final forever, with Kelleher detaching from the maul with a World Cup semi-final in his sights.

Another big-time tackle came from Jordie Barrett on No.8 Jasper Wiese on the final play of the first half. The 120kg wrecking ball lined him up from a lineout launch; Barrett took him direct and stripped the ball one-on-one for another lost ball.

After a long period of sustained pressure from South Africa camped in the All Blacks’ 22, this was a huge escape, with the All Blacks kicking the ball out to head to the sheds.

Barrett finished with five turnovers won, including a clean breakdown steal inside his own 22 on Eben Etzebeth.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the second half, more dogged defence paid off. Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu slipped through the line before Ruben Love slowed him down with a chop tackle. A scrambling effort from Savea held him up over the line to save a try.

With scrum penalties piling up in South Africa’s favour, the Springboks had a chance to level the game 19-all with a regulation three in front of the posts. Captain Pieter-Steph du Toit opted for another scrum, looking to milk cards.

It was akin to putting all the chips in and calling the All Blacks’ bluff, only for the Kiwi reserve front row to come up with pocket aces and win the big pot.

They held firm, and Fletcher Newell popped open Gerhard Steenekamp to win a huge penalty, escaping from the situation. The Boks left again with zero points. This is the story of the day: 10 entries into New Zealand’s 22 for a measly return of 0.7 points per entry.

ADVERTISEMENT

You can bet your bottom dollar that this was not a Tony Brown game plan. Erasmus hinted as much all week, saying ‘we believe it will be a grind’ multiple times.

He knew his halves would kick everything they had, with Grant Williams and Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu tasked with bombing the living daylights out of the All Blacks through high ball raids.

This is not Brown’s style, and not the attacking game South Africa has supposedly evolved under his coaching. Erasmus missed a trick this week, and it cost them the first Test in more ways than one.

The decision to go for a 6-2 split backfired when winger Kurt-Lee Arendse was forced from the field in the 9th minute. When Kolbe succumbed to injury in the 58th, they lost both wingers without an outside back replacement.

Jesse Kriel had to play wing for 71 minutes; Grant Williams moved to the other for the final quarter. Andre Esterhuizen moved into 12 and pushed De Allende to 13. The backline that the Springboks had to play with was certainly not their preferred line-up.

South Africans look at Jasper Wiese’s game and obsess over the power carries and ignore the turnovers that cost them.

Directly after taking the lead 13-12, he tried to run down the sideline out of his 22 from the kickoff and went into touch, a poor decision that resulted in the All Blacks having a lineout in great field position.

On the edge of the All Blacks’ 22, he took a hard carry off 9 directly into the back of Damian Willemse for an obstruction, resulting in a scrum to New Zealand. Willemse shares equal blame for the turnover.

The one-on-one strip by Jordie Barrett lost the ball on the first phase in a key moment. Then he was offside in the way of Jacobson, who was able to strip-steal Grant Williams.

Wiese’s errors in the first half contributed massively to keeping the All Blacks alive. In total, there were 23 turnovers lost by South Africa, a schoolboy performance.

Because they couldn’t put the All Blacks away, they found themselves with the knife against the throat when Will Jordan flipped the game with a shifty kick return and pop pass for a flying Damian McKenzie.

McKenzie lit up Ellis Park, and only a great save from Damian Willemse prevented him from finding Roigard. The knocked-down pass bounced cruelly away from the No.9, ending with a five-metre scrum.

The All Blacks capitalised through Jacobson after a strong break off the back of No.8 Savea, and a 10-point lead blew the game open.

The Boks succumbed to the pressure with desperate cynical play on their goal line, earning two yellow cards which sank the ship, and the final blow came with a Will Jordan try in the corner.

The unusual behaviour from Erasmus signalled weakness to the All Blacks. He moved the team naming to Thursday, a deviation from the regular naming.

He last did that before the Eden Park Test last year too, which delivered a similar game plan and similar disappointment. The pre-game circus with technical laws advisor Jaco Peyper was another sideshow distraction.

When Erasmus shows signs of cracking publicly, he often reverts to his safest hand tactically, picking his most experienced veterans and his simplified version of high-ball rugby. He overrides Tony Brown, picks his oldest squad, and reverts to 2021 Bok rugby.

This is the second time in 12 months he’s done this against the All Blacks. Like last year, he has another chance, like Wellington in Cape Town next week.

But next year, there will be no second chances. They might switch up the team and win in Cape Town under Brown’s plans, but it seems the biggest threat to the Boks in 2027 is possibly Erasmus.

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

54 Comments
J
JW 45 days ago

The decision to go for a 6-2 split backfired when winger Kurt-Lee Arendse was forced from the field in the 9th minute. When Kolbe succumbed to injury in the 58th, they lost both wingers without an outside back replacement.

They didn’t go with a 6-2, they went with a typical 5-3, it’s just they chose impact in certain positions and the impact bench player had to be replaced by another from the bench (instead of taking off a tired starter, really though it’s irrelevant who was replaced, someone fresh came on). Where as on the other hand the All Blacks choose backup on the bench, players that are their in case of injury and needing to play 80. As a result Rennnie didn’t use three of his bench players.


It was that desire for impact from a strictly inside center like(in) Andre over a more versatile player like Fainga’anuku, Rieko, Tavatavanawai etc, players that have also started in the loose forwards or on the wing, along with midfield, that backfired. Basically the lack of a quality bench option in a 5/3 split. The fact that two wingers went down is not the relevant factor here, like the argument Hansen brought against the Sharks halfback and bench choices. Arguably Williams is so adapt at winger (more than Andre at flanker for instance) Rassie possibly even erred by not bringing on Reinach instead of Andre. That would have allowed the team to stick with many more plans perhaps, and we saw how much of a threat Williams could still provide on the wing and in the kick chase.


Will Rassie give his aging midfield a second go? They didn’t really get on this game, playing out of position. One thing is for certain, he is still going to try and use the perceived quality of his players with in an impact mindset, something he might be even more inclined to do given the result and fact he didn’t use his replacement lock.

E
Elmovator 44 days ago

Williams was a primary defender for all 5 AB tries. Maybe nothing to be done about Holland’s but his strength at wing didn’t seem to be defensive… Great box kicks while at 9 tho

C
CT 45 days ago

One swallow doesn't make a summer,Boks will bounce back I predict a good solid rogering for the AB,s next game

H
HS 45 days ago

The biggest question is what the average ruck speed was for both teams.

J
JW 45 days ago

You think Bok were playing too fast?

Z
Zafi74 45 days ago

It's interesting to note that the Springbox aren't officiated the same way when they play the All Blacks as when they play France...

B
Bazzallina 45 days ago

Meh Rassie&co got plenty of options think Eden park 2 caketin last year…

Think one thing worth considering and this was touched upon in forum pre match and that is Kriel at 13 and that maybe the bench needs to be set up to make sure he stays in that position as unless not playing at all he is that dude in that position for Boks.

G
GrahamVF 44 days ago

Massive blunder by not sending Williams to wing bringing in Reinach who knows SFM better than anyone else and no disruption to the 12/13 defensive axis.

J
JW 45 days ago

Yes while rebuking Smith’s article (idea it was a 6/2 split) it made me think about their bench and options a little more (paid basically zero attention to Boks games this year) and I’d think nor Rassie would probably like that choice back, and to make the change he did with Kolbe first thing when Arendse went down.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

The decision to go for a 6-2 split backfired when winger Kurt-Lee Arendse was forced from the field in the 9th minute.

Would someone inform Ben the Accountant that it was a 5/3 bench.


No wonder he switched to rugby “journalism”. He can’t count!


Like OTS.

R
RC 45 days ago

No it wasn't. That big juicer was named as a forward bro.

R
RD 45 days ago

Have SA lost their “Aura”? 😀

P
PB 45 days ago

Yes totally! After one loss. Note we also lost our aura vs the All Blacks in Auckland! Only to rediscover it spectacularly in Wellington 😉🤭

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Dead

W
WJ 45 days ago

I don’t think anyone in the NZ camp will get carried away, and Rennie has agreed it was very tight and the score looked more comfortable than it was. SA will be better next week for sure.

However, I am left with a question. There was endless talk before the game about SA having many different ways they can play, and if one is not working they can switch to another. This was more from the international press and NZ press than from the Boks themselves, who were much more measured. Where was this last night? When the power game stopped working, they seemed to have nowhere to go.

P
PB 45 days ago

Maybe when you lose both starting wings and have two yellow cards, your options diminish. But enjoy your little slight.

M
MM 45 days ago

Exactly WJ. Once you get scrum parity with the Boks, they are clueless!!

No idea how to change tactics.

W
Wayneo 45 days ago

No KLA next week and Kolbe will be back, he just had cramp.

I foresee some changes for next week to look more like the best Bok team.

Kolisi, Tank and Hooker will be back.

Manie and Reinach will start after the nightmare Williams and SFM had.

Posible that Brannas replaces van Staden and Mostert replacing Wiese on the bench to give it more of a bomb squad punch.

J
JW 44 days ago

Will Rassie reciprocate and use them like a bomb squad again?


You don’t want to get Fassie back in there?

G
GS 45 days ago

Think the dangers of the 6-2 bench were on show last night for the Boks.


Will be very interesting if they stick to it or will they go back to something like a 5-3 bench?


Little worried for the ABs, what the team will look like by the 3rd and 4th game given the amount of injuries been experienced. Segner’s injury sounds like he could be out for awhile, so interesting that as yet they have not called in a replacment?

J
JW 45 days ago

AB’s would have been more rodgered if they lost two wingers, Kriel + Williams are better options at wing than Carter + Tupaea.


Similar to the Sharks game losing two halfbacks, if that was us we might have feared better with Carter and Dmac as choices?

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

It was a 5-3 bench. The backs were:


1. Reinach

2. Libbok

3. Esterhuisen. Who came on for KLA. DDA shifted to 13 and Kriel moved to wing.


Just more proof that we shouldn’t believe everything Ben Smith writes.


And that it’s generally a good idea to watch the game one comments on.

A
Ayre123 None 45 days ago

The ABs backs devoured the two undersized KLA and Colbe and mangled Grant Williams to the extent of being terrified to perform, that posed a selection issue for Rassie, a quick fix would be bringing on Hooker, Q. Horn and MvdB but a big doubt Rassie will be allowed that change?

P
PickOllyMathisForAfricaTour,Dave 45 days ago

I wouldnt get carried away by the margin. It could have very easily been a 17 point springbok win save for a few key moments.

G
GL 45 days ago

By that standard it could have been an all black win in 2023 by 8 points

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 1 hour ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close