Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Sean O'Brien would have stayed at Leinster for just £112k a year

By Ian Cameron
Sean O'Brien om the charge against Toulouse

Sean O’Brien would have stayed at Leinster for just £112k a year, the Irish flanker has suggested.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a wide ranging interview with Peter O’Reilly in Sunday Times, O’Brien admits his reluctance to leave his his home province and the club he has played all his professioanl rugby with.

As first reported RugbyPass in February, the Carlow born backrow will join London Irish on a three-year deal, on a reported salary of £450k, as they look to re-establish themselves in the Premiership in 2019/20.

However, O’Brien comments suggest he wanted to stay at Leinster and would have done for a fraction of the what he will be paid at the London based club.

‘If I was offered a quarter of the money I’m getting going to London Irish to here, I would have stayed. That was the case, but I’m going to grab the opportunity with both hands, obviously, and do whatever I can over there.’

This suggests that whatever was on the table from the IRFU and Leinster, if an offer was made, was less than £112,000 per annum (€131,000).

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Would I say now that I’d be bitter? No, I’m not bitter because I get the business decision,’ he said. ‘While I mightn’t agree with them, I still get them. That’s life.’

O’Brien’s final years at Leinster have been dogged by numerous injuries, with the flanker making just 22 appearances in the last three seasons.

The 32 year old is one of Leinster’s most decorated players, having come through the Leinster Academy system and having played 122 times for Leinster since his debut in September 2008 against the Cardiff Blues.

In his time at Leinster he was part of the PRO12 winning squads in 2008, 2013 and 2014 as well as the Guinness PRO14 win last season.

ADVERTISEMENT

He has four Heineken Champions Cup medals, starting in the Heineken Cup Finals of 2011 and 2012, and also a Challenge Cup medal in 2013.

Off the back of these impressive performances in the blue of Leinster, he was named European Player of the Year in 2011.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 15 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

20 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE France and All Blacks in tug of war over latest star from New Caledonia France and All Blacks in tug of war over latest star from New Caledonia
Search