Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Players' body statement: Rugby Europe must be 'held acccountable'

By Online Editors
A player has been banned for two years after testing positive for a cocaine metabolite.

‘International Rugby Players’ has called for administrators across the sport to learn valuable lessons from the recent Rugby Europe Championship fallout.

It follows the decision of an independent judicial panel to dock Romania, Spain and Belgium points for fielding ineligible players in the tournament, eliminating them from potential RWC 2019 qualification.

The global representative body of professional players says the situation could easily have been avoided and feels a number of measures now need to be put in place for Tier Two tournaments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The player’s organisation is calling for tighter control around education of players on eligibility issues, a global database to track player eligibility and better monitoring of regional tournaments by the governing body. International Rugby Players will also start an eligibility education programme at the upcoming U20 Championships in France next month.

International Rugby Players CEO, Omar Hassanein said: “This situation has called into question the integrity and credibility of our game, which, if not properly dealt with, can have a widespread negative effect, as has been evidenced in other sports.

“We vehemently oppose any form of integrity breach creeping into our game and feel that administrators, along with players themselves, should be held to the highest account for any form of breach in future. Given that five Spanish players have been sanctioned for their reaction to this situation, we maintain the view that Rugby Europe should also be held accountable.

“Unfortunately, in this instance, the biggest losers end up being the innocent groups of players who have had their Rugby World Cup dream taken from them and fans that have been affected. We now need to take the learnings from this and ensure these events are never repeated,” he added.

Not only have these recent events had an impact in Europe, but the ramifications have been felt far beyond, with Samoa’s RWC qualification also affected due to the forced rescheduling of matches.

International Rugby Players has been working closely with its member body, Pacific Rugby Players, to ensure any knock-on effects from the Rugby Europe situation are minimised for Manu Samoa.

Pacific Rugby Players Board member Seilala Mapusua said: “The knock-on effect of such poor administration in Europe means that teams around the world now have to change their Rugby World Cup 2019 qualification plans. Samoan Rugby has enough challenges on its plate without this.

“Despite players having mandatory release for these matches under Regulation 9, for Samoan players it brings up issues around player release with clubs, availability and pre-season preparations – all of which are not ideal.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 16 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport' Bryan Habana: 'Sevens already had its watershed moment when it became an Olympic sport'
Search