Northern | US

Pedantic refereeing is 'killing' rugby union says Wallaby great


Taniela Tupou of the Reds prepares during the warm-up before the round 6 Super RugbyAU match between the NSW Waratahs and the Queensland Reds at Stadium Australia (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)
Comments
1 Comment

Former Wallaby fullback Chris Latham has taken aim at pedantic refereeing in rugby union, which he believes is killing interest in the sport and neutering the physical contest at its core.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking at media conference prior the Reds Waratahs game, Latham didn’t pull his punches in verbalizing what many fans – both inside and outside of Australia – feel about the direction the sport has taken.

Latham took aim at the handling of a recent citing for Reds prop Taniela Tupou over a clearout. The clearout was deemed to be good on the day in question but was later brought before a SANZAAR disciplinary panel anyway.

Video Spacer

RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

Video Spacer

RFU Belonging – Back in the Game

Luckily for the tighthead, it was deemed that the red card threshold has not been met and the citing was dismissed, saving the prop from a two-game suspension.

Related

The whole thing left a sour taste in Latham’ s mouth, as the Daily Mail Australia reported.

“It was cleared by the video referee, it was cleared by the ref. The commentary team, who are ex-players, they’re experts in the game, they’ve cleared it, yet SANZAAR still want to keep dragging it through.

“To have that all cleared and then to have the potential to lose one of your big-name players before one of the biggest games of the season is just wrong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For Latham, it’s indicative a greater malaise in the 15-man code, which is struggling to hold its audience in Australia.

“From a pure rugby point of view and as a purist of the game, we’re really killing the game with all these stoppages,” said the Latham, who won 78 Wallabies caps.  ‘Rugby’s an inclusive sport. We cater for bigger-boned men and women, the tall and short. If we take the contest out of the game, what do we become – a game that caters for one body shape.

“The beauty of our game is the contest in every element of the game, whether it’s the scrum, the lineout, the breakdown. Even the contest for high ball has become whoever comes off worst gets the penalty, instead of the one who gets the ball, gets the ball.’

Latham isn’t the only one exasperated by the Tupou citing. Red coach Brad Thorn was spewing over it.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I had some words I was going to say if it’d gone through; I would have been really unhappy about that,” Thorn said of the Tupou verdict.  “It’s good that common sense prevailed. If you’re going to make rulings around that sort of thing then you need to change the name of the game, call it something else. That was a very good clean out … the people and players enjoy that physicality. You don’t want to lose that.”

Win VIP tickets to Rugby's Greatest Rivalry

Win a VIP match experience at the Baltimore Test, plus travel & accommodation up to $2,500.

Enter To Win
Competition ends: 28 August 2026. USA Only. No purchase necessary.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 18 minutes ago
You don't pick Handre Pollard to score tries

Go and watch the 23 world cup final and count the missed tackles. The truth is Pollards defence has been awful since he returned from injury in 2023 and this them has continued in every game he has played. Its exactly why Leicester let him go. He has also failed to ignite attacks, he no longer carries the same ball carrying or physical edge his game once had in his early to mid 20’s due to multiple injuries. Pollard is not a better distributor than Libbok or SFM, he is not a better runner with the ball than either of them but he is a steady kicker in open play and at poles in clutch moments. His form tapered off terribly at the end of the URC and was woeful for the Bulls in their semi and final. BTW check his missed tackles from both those matches and tell me if he is any better at defence than Libbok? Check his errors in kicking for touch in both games as well. The Bulls attack was outstanding in the URC but in truth most of it came from their blazing wingers, combos at 12/13 and their loose forwards and had little to do with the man at 10. SFM is an outstanding defender by comparison, he is physical and abrasive and once made more than 15 tackles playing for province in a match playing at 10. In fact he has been discouraged from being so physical by Dobson and others so he does not get into the dirty stuff and has been asked to defend just his channel and focus on his role at 10.

24 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close