Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Michael Cheika snubs controversial Wallabies star from World Cup training camp

Karmichael Hunt. Photo / Getty Images.

He may have been welcomed to the Waratahs with open arms, but controversial Australian star Karmichael Hunt hasn’t been greeted as warmly by Wallabies head coach Michael Cheika.

ADVERTISEMENT

The six-test midfielder, who made his name in rugby league before switching to AFL and then rugby union in 2015, is the biggest name to have missed the cut for Cheika’s 40-man group that will assemble in Sydney on Saturday in preparation for the World Cup.

His omission from the group comes after his pre-season switch from the Reds to the Waratahs following a fall-out with Queensland head coach Brad Thorn, which saw him fail to take to the field in Super Rugby at all last year as result of a run-in with the law regarding drug-related issues.

While Cheika is thought to value Hunt highly, it is understood that he is keen for the 32-year-old to continue to ply his trade for the Waratahs and earn his stripes at Super Rugby level before being welcomed back into the national set-up.

It will be the second time Cheika has run a Wallabies camp this year, after running a controversial training camp in January which saw four of his player return to their clubs with injuries.

However, no training will be involved this time round, with the congregation of players set to be used as an opportunity to monitor and screen players, and will allow them to continue their recovery from the opening rounds of Super Rugby.

All coaches, barring a replacement for recently-dismissed attack coach Stephen Larkham and yet-to-arrive director of rugby Scott Johnson, will be in attendance and will conduct one-on-one meetings with the players.

ADVERTISEMENT

The camp will be the first time players have come together since the kick-off of Super Rugby last month, with players from the Rebels and Brumbies to arrive at Rugby Australia headquarters on Saturday morning, while members of the Waratahs and Reds will join the group following their clash at the Sydney Cricket Ground later in the day.

Other notable names to have missed the cut include Anaru Rangi of the Rebels and Lachlan McCaffrey of the Brumbies, while recently-discarded stars Quade Cooper and James Slipper have been included in the camp.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’ The Springbok Eben Etzebeth calls ‘one of the hardest men in rugby’
Search