Ian Foster unveils 'beneficial' reduction in All Blacks leadership group
Ian Foster has revealed a significant reduction in the All Blacks leadership group is helping drive his new era.
Rather than replace experienced figures such as Kieran Read, Ben Smith, Sonny Bill Williams and Ryan Crotty who all departed after last year’s World Cup, Foster has instead compressed the number of players responsible for delivering player-driven messages.
Sam Cane, with a series of commanding performances, continues to grow into the captaincy role he assumed from Read this year.
Locking away the Bledisloe Cup represents the first triumph of the Foster-Cane partnership that is in its infancy.
“He’s done a job he can be particularly proud of,” Foster said of his skipper. “He’s led the team well off the field, he’s empowering others, he’s got a very dynamic leadership team, it’s a smaller team than we’ve had before but there’s people who are really shining in that space such as the Sam Whitelock, Aaron Smith and Beauden Barrett who have done a good job supporting him.
“What I love about Sam is his first job is to play well. If you look at his performances on the park it’s pretty clear and obvious how much it means to him to lead this team.”
Probed about the reduction in the leadership group, Foster revealed he has opted for a tight-knit team.
“We lost about five from last year so basically we haven’t replaced them so the leadership group is significantly smaller. We felt with some new coaches and a few other new people it was important we get a few people aligned at a deep level and then we’ll see whether we expand it after that.
“It’s been really beneficial because it’s put a lot of pressure on some of our leaders to make sure they are leading really effectively and putting a lot of work into that space so we’re delighted with where we are at.”
The All Blacks have ensured the Bledisloe Cup will stay in New Zealand for yet another year after blowing the Wallabies out to hand themselves a 29-5 victory in Sydney. #BledisloeCup #AUSvNZL https://t.co/7IlUkykUk4
— RugbyPass (@RugbyPass) October 31, 2020
One of the many advantages the All Blacks held over the Wallabies in their record 43-5 victory in Sydney was superior experience.
While 20-year-old Wallabies rookie playmaker Noah Lolesio struggled to find his feet on the big stage, in the last two tests the All Blacks have seen the likes of Caleb Clarke, Hoskins Sotutu, Alex Hodgman and Tupou Vaa’i all flourish on debut.
The depth of the All Blacks is such that many more new faces – Cullen Grace and Will Jordan among them – are likely to get their chance in the coming weeks, too.
The ease with which the All Blacks rookies have transitioned is testament to their temperament yet it also highlights an environment that allows them to immediately feel comfortable to transfer their skills from Super Rugby to the test arena.
Coaches, of course, play a large role in that process but so, too, is the leadership group responsible for getting the best out of all players, particularly those new to this highly scrutinised stage.
Many wondered aloud what changes would come from the Foster taking the reins from Steve Hansen.
Reducing the leadership group is one tweak that already appears to be paying off, with All Blacks halfback TJ Perenara noting the difference.
“Whether you add or take people away from the leadership group you are going to notice that. The big influence it’s had our on group is it’s given more people time to have their voice,” Perenara said. “When you’ve got 12 people sitting in a room compared to eight it’s just math that you’re going to have more time to have a discussion about certain points without having to have so much different input.
“The dynamic of this group gives us more of an opportunity to chew the fat a little bit more on issues that come up. It gives people more opportunity to have their voice heard and we’re not rushed as much in a lot of our conversations which leads to a little bit more clarity.
“We’ve got a lot of leaders in this group who either captain their Super Rugby franchises or are in leadership roles so you see those boys stepping up and being leaders throughout the week which is so helpful to Sam and to be able to perform at the level we need to.”
Comments on RugbyPass
This is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
2 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
4 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to comments