Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England's defence is the first ailment in need of treatment

By Ben Smith
(Photos by Warren Little/Getty Images/Alex Davidson - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

When Eddie Jones sought out rugby league coach Anthony Seibold to oversee England’s defence after the departure of John Mitchell, he boldly brought in the man who oversaw the worst season in Brisbane Broncos’ history in 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the NRL’s strongest clubs historically with six titles in their short history, the Broncos were already on a decline but under Seibold’s watch fell off a cliff in his second season, winning three games from 20, whilst shipping a points differential of -356 and secured the club’s first ever wooden spoon.

This was hardly the credentials of a fit for purpose rugby league coach, let alone as the defence coach of England in the other rugby code.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Coaches with rugby league backgrounds have made successful transitions into union, most recently David Kidwell who has transformed Argentina’s defence, but based on Seibold’s dubious record, the appointment was always going to be a gamble by Jones.

Seibold’s two seasons in charge of the Broncos came to a swift end with both sides agreeing to an early termination. In other words, it was better for the team if they paid him not to be there.

If Jones’ tenure comes to an end on Monday, it will be his failure to keep assistants that can be pointed to as a shortcoming of his rein in the final years after incredible success in his first World Cup cycle.

All areas of England’s game have trended downwards since Jones lost Scott Wisemantel as an attack coach, Steve Borthwick as a forwards coach and John Mitchell as a defence coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

As Ian Foster of the All Blacks can attest too, assistants matter. The arrival of Joe Schmidt has sharpened so much of what they do with the ball, while bringing in fresh ideas to utilise the best of the skills the players have.

If Jones is sent packing, who is England’s next head coach matters far less than the make up of England’s entire coaching staff. The first order of business with Jones or without will be to improve the defence.

Without a strong foundation, they will not be a real contender in France next year despite having a favourable path into the semi-finals.

England’s defence isn’t porous, but is no longer dominant and struggled to consistently control the gain line this Autumn under Seibold’s watch.

ADVERTISEMENT

Their best performance came against Japan but they failed to maintain the same standard against the Rugby Championship sides.

Particularly reseting the line off a set-piece, just one player lagging behind can derail the system.

The English pack has been caught out like this numerous times and leads to the opposition getting a roll all too easy.

They found themselves defending their own goal line against the All Blacks a little over 60 seconds into the game, a worrying sign for the side that famously knocked New Zealand out of the Cup three years ago with staunch defence.

There were miscommunication issues, poor decisions and overall a failure to execute to a high standard whether it be choice of running line, or the decision to make the tackle or the tackle itself.

It is hard to discern England’s strategy around competing at the ruck, with players just operating on their own accord and with a lack of urgency at times.

An early passage against the All Blacks shows the concerns with England’s defence which slips into an apathetic state just a minute into the test match.

Flanker Dalton Papalii bailed on releasing the ball to the backs after peeling from a lineout maul and decided to cut back into the traffic and set up a first ruck, tackled by prop Kyle Sinckler.

Communication issues are apparent from the outset for England.

Maro Itoje (4) called for reinforcements on the short side and Marcus Smith (10) and Luke Cowan Dickie (2) answered his call.

Jonny Hill and Ellis Genge were already on the short side, but both were fixated on the developing ruck instead of setting up for the next phase.

Genge is a bystander while Hill was in no man’s land. He didn’t get over the ball and isn’t in position as a pillar defender, basically grandstanding at the ruck and giving the All Blacks a free invitation to hold him.

England end up overcommitted on the short side with the entire tight five and both halves there, seven players covering the 15-metre channel.

One phase into the sequence England are behind the 8-ball, just from Papalii peeling off the back of the maul and carrying.

On the next phase Cowan-Dickie (2) jumped back over to the open side as the ball came out of the ruck, but slipped off the tackle on Scott Barrett (6) on an inside ball from the lead pod runner Ethan de Groot.

Barrett slipped through the tackle but fell over, becoming isolated in behind the England line.

The closest English defender Hill (5) had a golden opportunity to strike over the ball but tripped over and fell to the ground next to Barrett.

England needed to slow the ball and contest right here, but the lock’s execution let them down.

With Hill on the ground the All Blacks have rapid quick ball for Ardie Savea to take a pick-and-go against pillar defence that hadn’t formed.

Billy Vunipola (8) is offside retreating through the gate, while on the other side Genge is equally uninterested in covering the space effectively.

Savea has an open path either side of the ruck to build more momentum for the All Blacks.

Later in the passage the All Blacks release to the backs, anchored on Jordie Barrett (12) who had the option of Rieko Ioane (13) flat of Richie Mo’unga (10) sweeping out the back.

Barrett opted for a short ball to Ioane to puncture the English midfield and target Owen Farrell’s outside shoulder.

Both Tom Curry (7) and Manu Tuilagi (13) are guilty of making bad decisions which end up costing their side on the following phase.

Curry was locked into delivering a hit on Barrett, which left his outside man Farrell one-on-one on Ioane.

The No 7 clattered into Barrett but did not stop the ball and in the process made himself redundant. He then had to scramble back into the line to get back onside.

It was wasted energy by Curry and unfortunately the decision of Tuilagi (13) compounded issues.

Tuilagi (13) made a late decision to join the tackle even after Farrell had Ioane wrapped up going to the ground.

By diving late into a tackle he didn’t need to make, England’s No 13 further weakened the short side that was already down on numbers.

Kyle Sinckler (3) was desperate to set the edge and tried a shortcut over the forming ruck and tripped up, putting himself on the ground.

Curry, having pressured Barrett after the pass, is also still trying to get back onside to form the defence on the edge as the ball was presented to All Black halfback Aaron Smith.

Tuilagi is out of play, Curry is out of play and Sinckler is out of play, all due to poor decision-making or execution.

Barrett (12) was able to flatten up for a chance to threaten the line which had been worn thin.

With Curry on his heels after scrambling back onside, Barrett beat him with a step to on inside and cut England open for a half-chance.

A late cover tackle from Vunipola saved England from conceding, but the All Blacks were only one inside support runner away from scoring from an offload by Barrett.

Even though the All Blacks don’t eventually score in the passage, the number of individualistic and lazy decisions across the entire sequence is what is of concern for England.

They were forced backward inside their own five on the All Blacks’ first launch of the game less than two minutes into a test match with breakdowns everywhere in their defence.

The bad habits on show above have been common occurrences for England who go in-and-out of sync during defensive sets.

They aren’t a lost cause by any means, but they aren’t functioning anywhere near the level they were three years ago under Mitchell when they held the All Blacks to just seven points.

They’ve regressed and standards have slipped.

Whether Anthony Seibold had a fine-tuned defensive system for rugby union is another question, and why Eddie Jones wanted him to oversee his defence in the first place is a mystery.

Regardless of whether Jones is let go or stays, improving the defence is high on the priority list for England. They should not be falling apart two minutes into a Test match.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 7 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

30 Go to comments
A
Adrian 9 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

30 Go to comments
T
Trevor 12 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING RFU statement: TMO reaction to alleged foul play against Owen Farrell RFU statement: TMO reaction to alleged foul play against Owen Farrell
Search